A theoretical question on the Yamaha seat

MotoGP Forum

Help Support MotoGP Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Would Dorna interfere in the decision of who gets the 2nd Yamaha seat?

  • No, Dorna would not interfere. They will let Yamaha choose

    Votes: 27 84.4%
  • Yes, they would interfere, and try to get Dani Pedrosa on the second Yamaha

    Votes: 2 6.3%
  • Yes, they would interfere, and try to get Maverick Viñales on the bike.

    Votes: 3 9.4%

  • Total voters
    32
Rossi will never leave the sport he loves, already runs an academy to bring new talent to GP. He'll also no doubt manage a team in the big class and guarantee a zillion discussions about him right here!


I bet he retires in 2018 when Lorenzo wipes him on the duc
 
Playing off the title of this thread, here is some 'Theoretical err...Theatrical "Journalism"'.


MotoGP?s dark side: the twits and the trolls | Motor Sport Magazine


I like how Mat Oxley completely glosses over the INDIVIDUAL who started this .....

Okay I'm going to go further back in the season and say it was Lorenzo who first came out with disrespect for VR last season thus starting the bad feelings.
Rossi hits back at Lorenzo; It's war
Not defending Rossi here, just pointing out that Lorenzo had also been sticking the verbal boot in too. I'm hoping you also see that for what it is, same stuff that Rossi gets rapped for all the time.
 
There was nothing disrespectful towards Rossi in Lorenzo's comments Dani, he said two things.
1 being the data sharing was in his mind one sided. True.
2 being bad luck cost him the Japanese gp. True. He mastered the wet and put about a second a lap into everyone and built a big lead, only for the weather to dry up and shred his tyre.
There was no smartness from Vale or Dani that day, simply luck as their tyres hadn't been pushed as much as neither were willing to push in the wet like Lorenzo did that day.
You are defending Rossi but in this case you're wrong.
 
There was nothing disrespectful towards Rossi in Lorenzo's comments Dani, he said two things.
1 being the data sharing was in his mind one sided. True.
2 being bad luck cost him the Japanese gp. True. He mastered the wet and put about a second a lap into everyone and built a big lead, only for the weather to dry up and shred his tyre.
There was no smartness from Vale or Dani that day, simply luck as their tyres hadn't been pushed as much as neither were willing to push in the wet like Lorenzo did that day.
You are defending Rossi but in this case you're wrong.

Wrong, read my post, it does say I'm NOT defending Rossi, I'm pointing out the double standards employed by some, it's ok for one but not the other.
Also it was said back in the day that Hayden's championship was luck, which is wrong, so was Jorge's statement.
 
Okay I'm going to go further back in the season and say it was Lorenzo who first came out with disrespect for VR last season thus starting the bad feelings.
Rossi hits back at Lorenzo; It's war
Not defending Rossi here, just pointing out that Lorenzo had also been sticking the verbal boot in too. I'm hoping you also see that for what it is, same stuff that Rossi gets rapped for all the time.

Here's Lorenzo's quote...

So yes, I believe at this moment of the championship especially but in general, I am the fastest one this year because the bike, my speed, my concentration. But these are the circumstances at this moment and maybe it will change in the next rounds.

Disrespectful?

You should read more carefully.

It was the media and Rossi trying to create a story out of a non-story.

He was the fastest rider in 2015, his 7 race wins were flag to flag. There's no doubt his bike was good as the M1 last year was a better bike than the RCV overall.

There's no double standard, there's only those who want to believe it.
 
Well, being the fastest means winning: if it means something more abstract based on datas, fine, but then it's worthless. Lorenzo's pace has gained meaning last year after he was crowned champion, not before. If Rossi had won it, something which afterall has come very close to being reality, his consistency/adaptability would have been much more meaningful than Lorenzo's pace. Now, leaving all controversy aside (hopefully forever, both from Rossi lovers and haters), since Lorenzo won in 2015, we can say his pace was the defining factor of the championship.

Moral of the story is: data-based overall superior speed doesn't always mean you're the better rider. And Lorenzo has this thing where often when he loses he has to remark it to downgrade other riders (often Rossi's) performance. As much as I think reasonable Rossi fans should understand why a lot of people here have a lot of things against 46, reasonable Rossi "haters" here should understand why such repeated post-race remarks from Lorenzo are perceived as dull. They are dull, just like Rossi's "golden prince" attitude sometimes is kinda dull.
 
Here's Lorenzo's quote...



Disrespectful?

You should read more carefully.

It was the media and Rossi trying to create a story out of a non-story.

He was the fastest rider in 2015, his 7 race wins were flag to flag. There's no doubt his bike was good as the M1 last year was a better bike than the RCV overall.

There's no double standard, there's only those who want to believe it.
So everything about Rossi is a story and everything about Lorenzo is a non story ?
 
I think the trouble is Daniboy, is that Rossi's Modus operandi for a long time has been to subliminally give out messages and take digs at his rivals, so when you have form it is common for people to think that way.

Lorenzo has by no means never courted contreversy with his comments, but things Rossi says like "It takes balls to ride for Ducati, so I think Lorenzo will stay with Yamaha" are a direct insult towards Lorenzo.
 
Why is it that since Rossi came to Motogp, he has made "enemies " out of all fast riders/championship contenders while others have not? Other riders might have little spats here and there due to on track incidents but all were forgotten and good after, mostly. No continued bad bloods between each others like Rossi with biaggi, stoner, Marquez and Lorenzo. Is that because others are .... and Rossi is mother Teresa? Or other riders are just jealous of Rossi success?
 
What i want to know, is why do these people get so emotionally invested in a guy who A: They've probably never met and B: Doesn't care about them, to the poin where they waste away their life defending said person to the death and arguing with anyone they construe as having spoke bad of their idol like they have been insulted personally?

What I want to know is why do members of superior intelligence, with realistic takes on racing, waste their time trying to talk logic and facts to Boppers who are cloaked in denial and cognitive dissonance and general knuckle-dragging stupidity? It's like trying to get Trump supporters to see the benefit of voting for Bernie Sanders. It's an exercise in futility. Y'know, just sayin'.
 
Rhetorical question Kesh ;)

I don't see the problem with Trump, after all, he says everyone loves him!
 
Okay I'm going to go further back in the season and say it was Lorenzo who first came out with disrespect for VR last season thus starting the bad feelings.
Rossi hits back at Lorenzo; It's war
Not defending Rossi here, just pointing out that Lorenzo had also been sticking the verbal boot in too. I'm hoping you also see that for what it is, same stuff that Rossi gets rapped for all the time.
"What I want to know is why do members of superior intelligence, with realistic takes on racing, waste their time trying to talk logic and facts to Boppers who are cloaked in denial and cognitive dissonance and general knuckle-dragging stupidity?"

......nuf said
 
Okay I'm going to go further back in the season and say it was Lorenzo who first came out with disrespect for VR last season thus starting the bad feelings.
Rossi hits back at Lorenzo; It's war
Not defending Rossi here, just pointing out that Lorenzo had also been sticking the verbal boot in too. I'm hoping you also see that for what it is, same stuff that Rossi gets rapped for all the time.
Rossi accuses Marquez of cheating: true.

Rossi accuses Lorenzo of disrespect: true.

No need to check for reality, if Rossi said it, well it's true.


---

Logic:

Slaves work for free. They are free to work. Therefore slaves are free. Freedom!
 
"What I want to know is why do members of superior intelligence, with realistic takes on racing, waste their time trying to talk logic and facts to Boppers who are cloaked in denial and cognitive dissonance and general knuckle-dragging stupidity?"

......nuf said

Why quote me and then quote Kesh, he was quoting some other post that didn't refer to me! Unless you're trying to join the ranks of the super intelligent?
 
Logic:

Slaves work for free. They are free to work. Therefore slaves are free. Freedom!

FREEDOM FREEDOM FREEDOM OY!

De0sq21.gif
 
Why quote me and then quote Kesh, he was quoting some other post that didn't refer to me! Unless you're trying to join the ranks of the super intelligent?

Because you're making stupid ....... unintelligent posts, that's why.
 
Rossi accuses Marquez of cheating: true.

Rossi accuses Lorenzo of disrespect: true.

No need to check for reality, if Rossi said it, well it's true.


---

Logic:

Slaves work for free. They are free to work. Therefore slaves are free. Freedom!

Haha I actually work for Freedom (infrastructure services) therefore I am a slave! Woop woop !!!! Not only have I read it, it was said by Lorenzo in one of his post race interviews that I HEARD .
 

Recent Discussions

Recent Discussions

Back
Top