Looking at the field for 2012, around half of them, based on racing accomplishments, deserve to be called Moto GP riders.
Biaggi was a fantastic 250 rider, but he couldn't cut it at the highest level.
That's the point of Motogp. Biaggi was a great 250 rider, but when he stepped up to the top class we all discovered he was just a a hairs width off being the worlds best.
Unless the bikes are complicated and the tires difficult etc then we don't find out who has that something extra. On dumbed down bikes the winner will become a lottery, Biaggi would appear to be what he is now on sbk. Spies is another example, not until he reached Motogp did a ??? appear and even he admits it's harder than he thought.
Great logic u got there, not. So anybody who didnt win the premier title wasnt cut out for the class? (And dont reply, when did u say that, it the logic of ur post). The only thing dumbed down around here is the ligic of that opinion buddy.Dude, we get u dont like the CRTs, but ur reasons for not liking them have yet to surface a reasonable explanation.
So Biaggi was a hair off the mark because supergood riders were in the field? There is a long list of riders that belonged in MotoGP that didnt win the title genius. Randy Mamola was runner up 4 times, so did he belong in the class because he never wont title? Do u know how many times Schwantz was runner up? Even in 93, he still may hav come runner up. Biaggi certainly belonged in MotoGP.
black flag
Max beat Mick.. In fact Micks 5th was won by a black flag
Great logic u got there, not. So anybody who didnt win the premier title wasnt cut out for the class? (And dont reply, when did u say that, it the logic of ur post). The only thing dumbed down around here is the ligic of that opinion buddy.Dude, we get u dont like the CRTs, but ur reasons for not liking them have yet to surface a reasonable explanation.
So Biaggi was a hair off the mark because supergood riders were in the field? There is a long list of riders that belonged in MotoGP that didnt win the title genius. Randy Mamola was runner up 4 times, so did he belong in the class because he never wont title? Do u know how many times Schwantz was runner up? Even in 93, he still may hav come runner up. Biaggi certainly belonged in MotoGP.
Started with cadalora for me. They were good on their day. Now Rossi is turning into Biaggi. It's the bike, it's the tires, the shoulder, it's because I'm bigger than stoner ha ha
It's my wrist, ive got a belly ache, its the big bang engine, rossi rides dangrous and its not fair. Who said all of this when he wasn't winning? Your a tosser!
It's my wrist, ive got a belly ache, its the big bang engine, rossi rides dangrous and its not fair. Who said all of this when he wasn't winning? Your a tosser!
Biaggi was and still is one of my favorite riders. He belonged in motogp. If Honda, yamaha and Ducati supplied the same spec bike to all their riders, even if it was only 12 riders on the grid and bridgestone gave each rider exactly what they want, not a compromise, then that would do me just fine. Leave CRT with sbk.
The really excessive whinging imo has been the whinging about stoner's whinging, particularly on internet forums,