This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Yamaha extends Rossi contract to 2018

The point is not to prove Rossi is a mediocre talent. The point is the best riders deserve the best equipment. The way it should be. But to be the best rider what do you need? The best equipment. Without it you might suddenly appear mediocre, even 9 times. Catch 22 maybe?

The question is why would you support it being that way? You said, the way it should be.

One of the major reasons motogp is so lopsided is imo Rossi did not think 07 was a fair fight. That's not suprising he wants to win them all. The problem I have is that it appears the governing body agreed with him and set about modifying rules to make sure 08 was not a repeat. I cant remember that happening previously and I view it all as highly detrimental to the sport in the long run. That's not a criticism of Rossi, but DORNA and the willingness to have motorhome meetings were rules are drafted up on napkins. I always thought the tyre war was a vital element of Motogp, the opportunity for the smaller teams to compete, the less well endowed to get a leg up so to speak.

Just when it appears in 2016 we have a decent set of fair stable rules, DORNA go and change them yet again with the rider point penalty system. It happens time and time again. A rule that was supposedly effective in dealing with dangerous riding particularly Moto3.

No man, I never said it is the way it should be -- I said it is the way IT IS. And it has been like that long before Rossi, or Marquez for that matter.

And, Rossi didn't say that 07 wasn't a fair fight. At least that I know. Please show me where he said that.

By the way, had the "governing body" been working for Rossi as some of you suggest, why the hell did they change the formula in blessed 2007? Rossi was quite comfortable with the 990's, wasn't he. Without that switch to 800cc, after 2006 he and Yamaha would have probably won another string of titles in a row.

Problem with all these Rossi-the-big-manipulator theories is that they don't stand even a modest reality check.
 
Good find and I clearly recall Burgess's misgivings concerning the spread of power of the new 2000 engine. The 'Criville' engine so to speak was the new supposedly improved HRC mill which was conferred or should I say, imposed upon to Criville for pre-season testing which as I mentioned was decimated due to a viral illness. Even referring to it as the 'Criville' engine is a misnomer. It was Honda's new motor which was earmarked for the Repsol team - JB makes it sound as though Criville designed the ....... thing.

How many times do I need to repeat this, Alex Criville had practically zero input into the direction of the 2000 NSR500. Even if he had expressed concerns as to the power delivery, it's highly unlikely that anyone at Honda racing would have paid him any attention and how many times have we seen that before?

When the results were not forthcoming the reversion to the previous years spec was a knee jerk reaction whilst the new plant was evaluated. When Burgess complains that they didn't get the coveted parts from 'day one', neither did Criville. I assure you, the '99 parts were not monopolised by the Repsol team, such retrograde solutions are simply not in their culture. As Valentino's results improved, testament to his speed learning the 500 - in addition to the cut and thrust nature of the class as Burgess concedes - the concessions came and they weren't simply from the previous year. I am confident that I can similarly find testimony to that. It was a remarkably similar situation to Marquez last year, although it is pretty telling that Burgess recollects the shambolic nature in the team that he had left behind - part vanity, part truth. So why was he not immediately fast tracked back to Criville given that you suggested that this was an option?

Also, when JB claims that they didn't get the preferred parts until 'the end' that is a gross distortion of the truth. What he means to say is after Criville - which was by about June/July as I recall, in other words, mid season. Following that, they were first in line for everything.

Your original contention concerning my mentioning Criville was this:



HRC didn't 'listen' to Criville at all. He was the main rider by virtue of being World Champion, and the weight, pressure and responsibility of developing the new engine proved too onerous. I think the point to make here is that HRC should have listened to Rossi's team, JB in particular...but even today, rarely do they listen to anyone - that simply isn't the philosophy. Criville was the hapless scapegoat and unwilling test pilot of the new 2000 spec bike.

My point about Rossi project was that long term he was the chosen one - so of course they wanted him to have the new engine and it was typical of Honda's myopia having Rossi test the previous season bike. Nonetheless, the old mantra - one year to learn, one year to win. Given the spectacularly dire performance of the flagship NSR - tey panicked and this plan was quickly fast tracked (if you pardon the pun) and the 99 spec motor was quickly although begrudgingly granted albeit after Criville's crew had made a meal of it. JB on the other hand knew the workings of the machine inside out and VR was already familiar with it. By August, the Natro Azzurro squad had become the full factory effort - such a U-Turn is not uncommon following summer recess although contrary to Burgess' recollections, support although initially piecemeal had arrived before then.

The contention that VR may have or may not won the championship during his inaugural year will remain subject to dispute. But actually, I find it quite disrespectful and dismissive of Junior, who lets not forget convincingly beat Rossi at Motegi and irrespective of their supposed handicapped start, held him off to secure the title on what I have always believed to be an inferior bike to the 99 spec NSR.

I appreciate this more careful approach. You say that the switch from Nastro Azzurro to full factory was already decided, whereas I say that it was decided on the basis of actual results. Rossi and Burgess were given a test year -- they would not have been promoted if their results had been poor. You say Criville was a victim of Honda, I say he was as well a victim of his own less-than-stellar talent. He was no Doohan, and no Rossi, that's it.

I see very well that all these points are debatable -- which means we are entitled to our opinions, aren't we. :)
 
I appreciate this more careful approach. You say that the switch from Nastro Azzurro to full factory was already decided, whereas I say that it was decided on the basis of actual results. Rossi and Burgess were given a test year -- they would not have been promoted if their results had been poor. You say Criville was a victim of Honda, I say he was as well a victim of his own less-than-stellar talent. He was no Doohan, and no Rossi, that's it.

I see very well that all these points are debatable -- which means we are entitled to our opinions, aren't we. :)

Absolutely and like you I embrace this is the spirit of the forum and the interest of constructive discourse.

The main issue that I vehemently disagree with is that it was on the basis of a one year trail. It was acknowledgement of the same established pattern - one year to learn one year to win. If successful, beyond that, there was a cosy seat being prepared on a revolutionary V5 motorcycle, possibly the finest racing machine that HRC ever built and it had someone's name on it. Clue, it wasn't Alex Criville. Are you aware how long the RC211v project existed before it even turned a wheel in testing? I think the other point I'm trying to get across here is that HRC cared less for the hapless Spaniard than even you appear to.
 
Absolutely and like you I embrace this is the spirit of the forum and the interest of constructive discourse.

The main issue that I vehemently disagree with is that it was on the basis of a one year trail. It was acknowledgement of the same established pattern - one year to learn one year to win. If successful, beyond that, there was a cosy seat being prepared on a revolutionary V5 motorcycle, possibly the finest racing machine that HRC ever built and it had someone's name on it. Clue, it wasn't Alex Criville. Are you aware how long the RC211v project existed before it even turned a wheel in testing? I think the other point I'm trying to get across here is that HRC cared less for the hapless Spaniard than even you appear to.

Look, Honda didn't make the RC211V with anybody's name on it. You surely remember that Rossi was against the move to 4 strokes and wanted to stay with 500cc. This is so well documented that any idea the 990cc was engineered in his favor is outlandish. Btw there is little doubt that he would have been as successful in the following years' titles on a 500cc, had they continued with them.

The move to 990 was, as you say, in Honda's agenda well before Rossi, for "industrial" reasons. And after Rossi (how to forget their top man's declaration: "we will beat Valentino Rossi"?), they imposed the 800cc formula pretty much against him, thinking it would favor them as the technological wizards, and jockey-sized Pedrosa.

Ahahaha, it didn't work -- but not for lack of trying on their part. If anybody really wants to find a "manipulator" of the series, albeit fortunately with mixed success, there you have it. But they stay behind the scenes, and probably it's easier to target an individual rider always at the center of the media's attention.
 
Absolutely and like you I embrace this is the spirit of the forum and the interest of constructive discourse.

The main issue that I vehemently disagree with is that it was on the basis of a one year trail. It was acknowledgement of the same established pattern - one year to learn one year to win. If successful, beyond that, there was a cosy seat being prepared on a revolutionary V5 motorcycle, possibly the finest racing machine that HRC ever built and it had someone's name on it. Clue, it wasn't Alex Criville. Are you aware how long the RC211v project existed before it even turned a wheel in testing? I think the other point I'm trying to get across here is that HRC cared less for the hapless Spaniard than even you appear to.
Serious: How long did it (RC211) machine exist before racing? How long did the M1 exist before racing? The Ducati was late to the game, but "existed"...The ugly exhaust bike that debuted...

The RCV. Did it have someone's name on it? Probably not. They are HRC aren't they? They were going to build a killer 4-stroke... for themselves. Not a rider.
Isn't that the theme for Haaarnda?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
No man, I never said it is the way it should be -- I said it is the way IT IS. And it has been like that long before Rossi, or Marquez for that matter.

And, Rossi didn't say that 07 wasn't a fair fight. At least that I know. Please show me where he said that.

By the way, had the "governing body" been working for Rossi as some of you suggest, why the hell did they change the formula in blessed 2007? Rossi was quite comfortable with the 990's, wasn't he. Without that switch to 800cc, after 2006 he and Yamaha would have probably won another string of titles in a row.

Problem with all these Rossi-the-big-manipulator theories is that they don't stand even a modest reality check.

Yea maybe, if guys named Stoner and Lorenzo never existed. I think both of those riders have shown cc's doesnt matter when it comes to beating Rossi.
 
Serious: How long did it (RC211) machine exist before racing? How long did the M1 exist before racing? The Ducati was late to the game, but "existed"...The ugly exhaust bike that debuted...

The RCV. Did it have someone's name on it? Probably not. They are HRC aren't they? They were going to build a killer 4-stroke... for themselves. Not a rider.
Isn't that the theme for Haaarnda?

Seriously - how long would you venture that the V5 was in existence for prior to its unveiling? On paper, a very long time - its inception went back years. Take a guess. No, of course it wasn't built with Rossi in mind - I'm not suggesting that, but by the time he had moved up to the then outgoing 500cc two stroke formula there was certainly one with his name on it.

Yamaha massively screwed up in testing, not least by appointing 'Lil John to lead development.

The M1 was the first to be revealed. I recall it vividly, Katsuaki Fujiwara of all people rode a couple of underwhelming parade laps on the thing at Catalunya, but most chose to remember the punch up between Rossi and Biaggi. Well it wasn't so much a punch up...that creep Gibo Badioli held Max's arms behind his back on the staircase while Rossi hit him in the face. Can't really call it a fair fight - even off track and behind the scenes it seems he likes things to be skewed in his favour.

Do you recall when the RC211v first publicly appeared? - Motegi later that year, Doohan and Spencer blasted in formation down the home straight. HRC didn't show their hand fully until the 2002 season opener at Suzuka of course, but you didn't need the pre-season testing whitewash to understand how indomitable this bike was going to be. Again, all part of a long term plan, a campaign which also involved the recruitment grooming of VR. Quite bizarre then that being instrumental in orchestrating the shift to 800cc formula they didn't apply the same level of military like planning prior to 2007.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Lorenzo won in Qatar because he chose the soft rear tyre, which actually got better and better during the race and actually allowed him to set a lap record on his 21st lap.
For Argentina we have the following tyre choice taken from the main article on motogp.com.

Michelin will also face a new challenge in Argentina. The options available for front tyres will therefore be the hard (yellow band) and medium (no band) tyres. Rear tyre choices are from the hard (yellow band) and medium options. For the first time this season the full wet and intermediate tyres will also be available should they be needed.

Is it sheer coincidence or is dorna taking steps to prevent Lorenzo running away from the field again?

I think it is more to do with the track surface been very abrasive as last years race showed with tyre degradation.
 
I think it is more to do with the track surface been very abrasive as last years race showed with tyre degradation.



I get your point, but isn't Losail supposed to be super abrasive too due to the sand that is constantly blown onto the track. Given the soft tyre outperformed by even Michelin's wildest dreams, why don't they take all tyres to all tracks and let the riders choose, falling on their own swords if they get it wrong?
Isn't that a fairer way to treat all the riders than the current "you'll use what we allow you to use" system that can favour some riders over others?
 
I get your point, but isn't Losail supposed to be super abrasive too due to the sand that is constantly blown onto the track. Given the soft tyre outperformed by even Michelin's wildest dreams, why don't they take all tyres to all tracks and let the riders choose, falling on their own swords if they get it wrong?
Isn't that a fairer way to treat all the riders than the current "you'll use what we allow you to use" system that can favour some riders over others?

Oh I agree that would be fairer.
I think it also comes down to the logistics too, it is a flyaway after all.
But to take all tyres, with enough of each for every rider to take his full allocation of every compound would be an immense undertaking.
Maybe not so in Europe. We will have to wait and see.
Time will tell I guess;)
 
Look, Honda didn't make the RC211V with anybody's name on it. You surely remember that Rossi was against the move to 4 strokes and wanted to stay with 500cc. This is so well documented that any idea the 990cc was engineered in his favor is outlandish. Btw there is little doubt that he would have been as successful in the following years' titles on a 500cc, had they continued with them.

J4rn0, you remind me of Talpa (not that you're much different) but Talps retorted, if Rossi is so powerful, why didn't he get Indy repaved since he "reasoned" the surface had caused Vale to crash. You're making the same ridiculous attempt to rebut the reality that Rossi is powerful and has enjoyed significant influence over the parity of the sport which has absolutely resulted in results rendering advantages.

Again, Rossi is the most powerful contestant in MotoGP, it has resulted in an inflated artificial record. The debate is how did we get to this point. Your rebuttal is, no, Rossi isn't any more special than anyone, all his accomplishments are on the level. Your grasp on Rossi’s reality in regards to the sport can be summarized in your belief that Ducati did nothing extraordinary or radical for Rossi, that is to say, your beliefs are typical of a fanbase that has little to no grasp in reality. Trying to reason with you about the reality of Rossi's status and influence and how it initially began is impossible if you can't admit or grasp episodes in that trajectory. Maybe Rossi isn't riding a Yamaha, but it's a RCV with Yamaha stickers? Why not? Anything is debatable. That sounds reasonable, right? When you J4rn0 can't process that Ducati bent over backwards, threw everything to try and make Rossi’s stint successful, but you insist they did NOT do anything special, what hope does anyone have in arguing how Rossi became the "Emporer" of MotoGP? Most Rossi fans still insist Rossi didn't fail, Ducati failed.

So Rossi was against 500 2-smokes, proof Rossi isn't powerful? That's your logical conclusion. Therefore, according to you, Rossi has no influence in the sport. Except, Honda had him in mind to ride the best machine ever engineered by HRC. Coincidence, perhaps. Except, you glossed over the fact that this project was contingent on Burgess being part of it. But Rossi was just an afterthought? Like say, Jack and the Beanstalk.


The move to 990 was, as you say, in Honda's agenda well before Rossi, for "industrial" reasons. And after Rossi (how to forget their top man's declaration: "we will beat Valentino Rossi"?), they imposed the 800cc formula pretty much against him, thinking it would favor them as the technological wizards, and jockey-sized Pedrosa.

Ahahaha, it didn't work -- but not for lack of trying on their part. If anybody really wants to find a "manipulator" of the series, albeit fortunately with mixed success, there you have it. But they stay behind the scenes, and probably it's easier to target an individual rider always at the center of the media's attention.

Wait, so you do believe in conspiracy. So you believe Honda chose a rider (Pedrosa) to pilot their great engineering plan at world domination? Wait wait, but you dont accept the exact same .... happened when Honda chose Rossi for the same purpose? Haha, what tangled webs you spin.

It's interesting that you selectively believe in conspiracy theories, in this regard you remind me of MigsAngel. You go around discrediting explanations as conspiracy when it suits you but are blind the the most obvious ones when you chose not to accept how the sport has created Rossi to be their Hulk Hogan. So in this case you accept Honda influenced a formula change to 800s "to beat Rossi" with Pedrosa. But you can't possibly accept that Rossi was the chosen one when Honda influenced a formula change to 990s? Wonderful, how does that logic work in your brain buddy? Seriously, it's fascinating. Busted. Hahaha.

Just yesterday I mentioned it to Arrabi, Honda may have pulled off the coup (see 'your' onspiracy above) to dominate the 800s had they been able to control the tire tiers. Yeah, thats right, if Michelin had an incentive to treat Pedrosa as they did Rossi, free of any competition, and with the blessings of both Dorna and Honda! Oh, you forgot to add this to your Honda theory J4rn0. Had Pedrosa enjoyed exclusive tires made for him like Rossi enjoyed during the 990 domination, it's quite likely Pedrosa would have a string of titles.

Oh ...., imagine that! Imagine 2007, no Bridgestone, only Michelins, where they give Pedrosa the good stuff and nobody else, not even Rossi (who you have conveniently forgotten threatened to quit if he didn't get Bridgestone). I'm fairly certain those FOUR runner-ups for Pedrosa might have been titles. That is the power of exclusive tires! Its why Pedrosa was 'seemingly' so much better than Stoner in 2006. Stoner was competing with 3rd tier Michelins. I cannot overstate this aspect of MotoGP. Rossi competed with top tires, often exclusive developed for him, against rivals like Stoner who often took the field with 2nd, 3rd, tier tires. How can anyone aware of this gloss over the results?

So let's recap: J4rn0 doesn't believe Rossi’s record is artificially inflated due to preferential treatment. Yet, in the very article he posted, there is a revelation that the team Rossi was assigned was contingent on the most successful crew chief signing up, for the manufacturer that had just won the last 6 titles, for a manufacturer that (J4rn0 admits has the power to influence formula changes) for a tire manufacturer that employed a good/bad tier system (then took that a step further to make exclusive one off tires) for a newly signed promoter who understood the idea of 'king building' to expand the sport, but none of this is noteworthy.

J4rn0, it's not a Honda vs Rossi proposition. Dorna saw value in helping both along with a willing tire manufacturer. It's why VRs transition from Honda to Yamaha made little change in his domination because competing with superior tires didn't experience as much as a hiccup. There is not one manipulator, but rather a cohort of them, each with their own power, influence, and agenda. Dorna promotes Rossi, that much is clear!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 5 people
Look, Honda didn't make the RC211V with anybody's name on it. You surely remember that Rossi was against the move to 4 strokes and wanted to stay with 500cc. This is so well documented that any idea the 990cc was engineered in his favor is outlandish. Btw there is little doubt that he would have been as successful in the following years' titles on a 500cc, had they continued with them.

The move to 990 was, as you say, in Honda's agenda well before Rossi, for "industrial" reasons. And after Rossi (how to forget their top man's declaration: "we will beat Valentino Rossi"?), they imposed the 800cc formula pretty much against him, thinking it would favor them as the technological wizards, and jockey-sized Pedrosa.

Ahahaha, it didn't work -- but not for lack of trying on their part. If anybody really wants to find a "manipulator" of the series, albeit fortunately with mixed success, there you have it. But they stay behind the scenes, and probably it's easier to target an individual rider always at the center of the media's attention.

I simply didn't say that HRC made the V5 with Rossi's name on it. Read my posts J4rn0. I said that once he was signed to Honda he was directly in line to ride it and not Criville, who wasn't in the plan.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
I simply didn't say that HRC made the V5 with Rossi's name on it. Read my posts J4rn0. I said that once he was signed to Honda he was directly in line to ride it and not Criville, who wasn't in the plan.

You dont need to be a rocket appliance to get what you meant. You're a much more patient man than me, I wouldn't entertain these ........ gotcha attempts. No Dr. degree needed to understand what you were referring to when the RCV was being engineered and who was destined to ride it.

Maybe the Pedrocyle had Hayden's name on it, eh?
 
Last edited:
You dont need to be a rocket appliance to get what you meant. You're a much more patient man than me, I wouldn't entertain these ........ gotcha attempts. No Dr. degree needed to understand what you were referring to when the RCV was being engineered and who was destined to ride it.

Maybe the Pedrocyle had Hayden's name on it, eh?

No, Jums. It was a serious question. Stop trying to engineer spats where none exist.
 
No man, I never said it is the way it should be -- I said it is the way IT IS. And it has been like that long before Rossi, or Marquez for that matter.

And, Rossi didn't say that 07 wasn't a fair fight. At least that I know. Please show me where he said that.

By the way, had the "governing body" been working for Rossi as some of you suggest, why the hell did they change the formula in blessed 2007? Rossi was quite comfortable with the 990's, wasn't he. Without that switch to 800cc, after 2006 he and Yamaha would have probably won another string of titles in a row.

Problem with all these Rossi-the-big-manipulator theories is that they don't stand even a modest reality check.
Wasn't 800 something of a knee jerk reaction after Kato's fatal accident? Bikes too fast for the amount of run-off at the majority of circuits. I think Rossi liked 990 but didn't necessarily want to die riding one, I doubt he had any serious objections to the change in the name of increased safety. Of course Ducati produced that unstoppable bullet of a bike. Absolute weapon, tricked up with playstation like electronics. Rode itself it did. Not fair. I know I know, you never said that, I'm just having some fun with it.

800cc would have been fine if Ducati would have got Melandri as they wanted. By the way an interesting side note, Stoner was on a low base salary at Ducati, they didn't really see him as a long term proposition, or at least he wasn't the first choice, more a fill in while they pursued Melandri.

So Colin Stoner goes in there to negotiate and asks for a win bonus to be added to the contract. Now I can just imagine Ducati managements reaction to that one, "a win bonus eh, how many races has this Stoner kid won so far? Zero. Ok 0 x $100,000 equals $0, yeah I think we can afford that". Must of been some laughs at Colin Stoner. What a legendary tale.

2007 was a shock to the whole establishment J4. A shock to Rossi, to Honda, to Michelin, to DORNA, even to Ducati. No-one saw it coming, but for sure the 'governing body' went to work in preventing it repeating.

Look at the situation in 2007. Kawasaki, Suzuki, Ducati, Gresini all signed up with Bridgestone. All lesser teams, lesser riders. No premier class world championships there, not for a long time anyway. lets call them the undeserved, the way it is.

The deserved were the typical power players of the sport. Rossi, Honda, Pedrosa, Yamaha Michelin. That's the way it was, the way it had always been.

Well that soon went to complete chaos didn't it. Ok so Rossi wanted the Bridgestone, he may or may not have threatened to quit, Yamaha may or may not have had a contract with Michelin that had to be broken, They may or may not have had to make a wall in the garage, Bridgestone may or may not have wanted Rossi, they and Ducati may or may not have liked the fact they had beaten him once, and wanted to do it again. Its all conjecture, Rossi got his Bridgestone tyres.
The lesser teams probably wanted then to go with the suddenly unfashionable Michelins, but Carmelo said NO! NO MORE 2007!!! Kawasaki promptly said .... you later and quit the sport, Suzuki went to a one bike team, Ducati went to ..... Its all ancient history I suppose.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 7 people
Seriously - how long would you venture that the V5 was in existence for prior to its unveiling? On paper, a very long time - its inception went back years. Take a guess. No, of course it wasn't built with Rossi in mind - I'm not suggesting that, but by the time he had moved up to the then outgoing 500cc two stroke formula there was certainly one with his name on it.

Yamaha massively screwed up in testing, not least by appointing 'Lil John to lead development.

The M1 was the first to be revealed. I recall it vividly, Katsuaki Fujiwara of all people rode a couple of underwhelming parade laps on the thing at Catalunya, but most chose to remember the punch up between Rossi and Biaggi. Well it wasn't so much a punch up...that creep Gibo Badioli held Max's arms behind his back on the staircase while Rossi hit him in the face. Can't really call it a fair fight - even off track and behind the scenes it seems he likes things to be skewed in his favour.

Do you recall when the RC211v first publicly appeared? - Motegi later that year, Doohan and Spencer blasted in formation down the home straight. HRC didn't show their hand fully until the 2002 season opener at Suzuka of course, but you didn't need the pre-season testing whitewash to understand how indomitable this bike was going to be. Again, all part of a long term plan, a campaign which also involved the recruitment grooming of VR. Quite bizarre then that being instrumental in orchestrating the shift to 800cc formula they didn't apply the same level of military like planning prior to 2007.

After its success, Honda went as far as issuing coyly photographed tear-downs of the RC's engine, but I've never seen anything on when they started the project (kinda unsurprising, as it would point to how early they got on the 4 stroke replacement thing). Nor have I seen when they decided on the V5 configuration.
As for the M1, it was massively compromised by shoehorning an I4 into a modded 500 chassis, screwing up the head design...but running carbs was a special kind of wierdness.
Just remembered another never-ran. The Sauber Petronas thing with the cheapest looking exhaust in racing.
 
This has gone full circle imo, from where I started when I joined the forum, where my gripe was Rossi fans discrediting Hayden's and Stoner's titles in 2006 and 2007 on the basis of supposed "unfair" equipment advantages, and as I said I am much more of J4rn0's view in regard to Rossi's first 5 titles at least, ie he was like Doohan, and probably reaped the benefits the best riders have always garnered in the sport, but I think he was just plain better than the likes of Criville, Gibernau and Biaggi, if not KRJR in his rookie year. (EDIT as Birdman said safety/excessive top speeds was a significant impetus for the change to the 800 formula, after the Kato incident, to which Honda added the fuel economy thing and the wish to express their mass centralisation engineering theory).

Specifically I thought we all agreed that the 990 formula was a fantastic formula, with the last year of that formula the year of the greatest parity ever, and where Rossi didn't prevail despite the existence of SNS tyres, I had thought rather significantly due to one Nicky Hayden riding rather well that season. The formula itself was devised for reasons not much to do with Rossi I would have thought, although he did benefit by being the lead Honda rider when Honda got the design of their bike spectacularly right in its first season. As to untoward favouritism towards Rossi, only him getting away with the Gibernau "pass" really comes to mind for me, but MM was subsequently leniently treated for much worse.

I would have thought both the abolition of SNS tyres and the introduction of the 800 formula were certainly not designed to help Rossi, although to an extent I think both he and Dorna perhaps drank some of Rossi's own kool aid and thought nothing could stop him after the success of the Yamaha move.

I don't believe the 800 formula was designed around Pedrosa at all, but rather around Honda engineering fetishes, and he was picked to suit the bike as Lex argued at the time; I am sure having to find someone human who suited the bike was an annoyance for the Honda engineers, who would probably rather have built a robot as we were wont to joke(EDIT should be here).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
A funny thing happened on the way to the forum...


Moreover, the Top Ten thread has recently been un-pinned and locked, and a Top Ten-lite post I wrote about Mike Webb's Moto2 debacle has been awaiting moderation approval/consigned to oblivion for over a week now. So this will have to do...

What?? You posted something that is pending approval. Did I understand you correctly
If thats true the gang of 4hores will get right on the case and remedy this

Here here, what is this crap about? Strange indeed. I am looking forward to reading your latest top ten laughalot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
Wasn't 800 something of a knee jerk reaction after Kato's fatal accident? Bikes too fast for the amount of run-off at the majority of circuits.

as Birdman said safety/excessive top speeds was a significant impetus for the change to the 800 formula, after the Kato incident,

It was precisely that...

So, these factors considered and in the interest of safety, let's introduce a formula that encourages significantly higher corner speeds.

Clever clever DORNA.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Correct me if I'm wrong as it's the best part of two decades ago now(jesus!) but wasn't Crivilles dip in form health related?
 

Recent Discussions