So now you are implying Stoner is faster than Rossi and that all the boppers have allways thought that
9 world titles
2 emoticons
So now you are implying Stoner is faster than Rossi and that all the boppers have allways thought that
When somebody says "proferred", it means that they have put forward the idea, so what "quote" do you actually want me to look for?. So you are suggesting you have seen the opposite, ie. the Boppers were saying that Stoner would be faster than Rossi? ( though I must note that since Valencia this has changed a bit ).
To save me bothering searching back.............. lets look at it from another angle ........
Boppers everywhere are saying Stoner is faster than Rossi on the Ducati .......... lets see the reaction to that and see whos "bullshitting
Look at the post above Kesh ........IRMC ......... its non-stop.
Look at the post above Kesh ........IRMC ......... its non-stop.
What ever you or any one else say BM, you can't deny the facts
For Curve
and kesh
'Ignore him at your Peril'
Hopefully second time round you'll get it Baz.....I know it takes a while
If 2007 wasn't the exception I would gladly agree but it is, 2006, 08, 09 & 10 all followed a similar pattern. Which he now has the chance to break on his return to Honda, which then of course will lead on to 2012 when he will have to develop the Honda & answer those questions as well. So how can we know how he will perform after just one test?Interesting view, and one I fully recognise as being in reply (retort?) to the views espoused by BM and as such taking the comment a bit that way.
But, I would suspect that the comment is incorrect as it would seem to be obvious that there was some issue with the Ducati throughout 2010 given the number of crashes experienced by all riders of that machine. As such, the problems would seem to have afflicted all and as such there would be no responsibility upon Stoner to prove otherwise.
The interesting point for me (and one borne out by a graph I saw somewhere) was that near all of the single Ducati rider crashes (ie, when not involved in multiple bike pileups) were of a front end lose variety/type. This would indicate a flaw in some level of the equipment and not the rider/s of that specific machine.
Now, the alternate (and still somewhat populous) view would be that the Ducati was vastly responsible for Stoner's success and if one takes this view it is certainly now time for Stoner to show otherwise given he is now on a bike of renowned pedigree.
For mine, he has the ability to ride and develop a motorcycle, albeit his development abilities may well be within a small operational sphere that very few (if indeed any) rider can enter but this is not a flaw of his, nor should it be seen as such.
Gaz
If 2007 wasn't the exception I would gladly agree but it is, 2006, 08, 09 & 10 all followed a similar pattern. Which he now has the chance to break on his return to Honda, which then of course will lead on to 2012 when he will have to develop the Honda & answer those questions as well. So how can we know how he will perform after just one test?
I heard they were going to stick a broom up his ... & make him sweep the floor at the same time tooStoner just got finished learning how to engineer and manufacturer carbon fibre, don't tell me know he is going to have to learn how to engineer and weld aluminium again for 2012.
If 2007 wasn't the exception I would gladly agree but it is, 2006, 08, 09 & 10 all followed a similar pattern. Which he now has the chance to break on his return to Honda, which then of course will lead on to 2012 when he will have to develop the Honda & answer those questions as well. So how can we know how he will perform after just one test?
It still holds good though, he now has the chance to replicate 2007 & give us a better picture of who he is.He was not without problems in 2009 obviously, but putting the bike down at a high rate was not one of them. One crash as I recall, the fabled valencia warm-up lap crash, later attributed to a faulty or non-applied tyre warmer which you may choose not to believe.
I just posted this is J4rno's other thread about Burgess too.
I hand typed this from Australian Motorcycle News, so may have some typos.
--------------
Interview with Burgess
by Michael Scott
...
"But when you look at Ducati, it's not a normal sort of motorcycle in the sense of what most motorcycles companies have out there. It doesn't have a chassis. There have to be other things to work on and adjust to give the rider what he wants. But it takes more than two days of testing to get on top of everything."
It all looks as though at least the early part of the season will be a bit hit or miss for Valentino and the Duke. Don't rule out the hits, but don't be surprised if he misses, because the restrictions on testing, as BUrgess explains, have turned the World Championship into a different sort of game.
"Back then we had loads of tests, but we're there to work, not go on holiday. We embark on improving the level of the sport from a rider's and a manufacturer's point of view… you need to test to do that.
Now it's just a television show. You run what you brung and if you're not ready, well, bad luck."
It still holds good though, he now has the chance to replicate 2007 & give us a better picture of who he is.
If 2007 wasn't the exception I would gladly agree but it is, 2006, 08, 09 & 10 all followed a similar pattern. Which he now has the chance to break on his return to Honda, which then of course will lead on to 2012 when he will have to develop the Honda & answer those questions as well. So how can we know how he will perform after just one test?
This was his take: He said, Stoner had different pressure and goals in the test than Rossi. Casey in going to a situation that required him to assert his position immediately because his biggest obstacle at Honda would/will come from within, specifically the Pedrosa-Puig dynamic. Honda have all but announced that they will not be developing much for the 2011 bike. Casey knew this going in and had to dominate the test to assure his place on the team in what little development Honda is willing to accomplish. He went on to say...
Rossi on the other hand, has zero pressure in assuring the direction of development. Not only does he not have this pressure, but Ducati had already committed to develop this year as if their lives depended on it. That means Rossi came in knowing that he would drive all development and that the magnitude of their commitment was limitless. So he was under no pressure to top the lap charts, unlike Stoner, who if he didn't would be hampered by his status in the team all year. Rossi's status is unquestionable, so his goal was to understand the machine, and concentrate on how they need to change it not to set the fastest lap.
Rossi is da best! Suck on dat chit hater boyzzzzz! 9 World Championships! Count 'em! 9!
Oh, you got a problem wid dat chit, huh? OK, I'll count 'em wid you.........hang on, just a sec..........dammit.......hell, who'd have thought you could be born with a dozen fingers, like every other mutha on this planet, and by votin' age you're down to 8? Dat's sum sick chit right dere. Anyways, Rossi is DA MAN!!
If you give us a minute, I'll have these muthafuckin' boots off....den it won't matter if da man wins a dozen titles!!!! Suck on my fat one you loosers!!