How do you feel about cannibalism?
As long as its consensual, I see no harm.
How do you feel about cannibalism?
If I were to spend my time bigging up MotoGP, I would be accused of being a stooge for the sport. Nobody would believe me, because they see the races for themselves. Right now, I'm being accused (on my own website, nota bene) of being a stooge for Dorna, because I dared to challenge Honda's arguments. If I were to write "what a fantastic sport MotoGP is, really exciting, don't know what all the fuss is about" I'd be accused of being a Dorna stooge, and for closing my eyes to the problems.
Yes, the sport needs promoting, yes, the positive sides need highlighting. But these MotoGP bikes do not stir my soul. They are too clinical. The riders I can admire, precisely because of the fact that these bikes are so clinical. Pedrosa, Lorenzo, Stoner have all exceeded their predecessors by a massive margin, because these bikes are so immensely difficult to ride to the very limit. The precision these three achieve is breathtaking. The problem is, when ridden correctly, these bikes look easy to ride. They barely move, Dorna's TV feed has to slow the speed down to 1000fps for viewers to appreciate the magnificence of both man and machine. That's your problem right there.
Anyway, enough self-justification. If you don't like what I do, then I suggest you find other websites to read and put me on ignore, I am just trying to pass the time until I finally die (and am hopefully composted, or turned into Soylent Green) as painlessly as possible.
Dear Powersliders,
Thank you for your vote of confidence, but I think I prefer to being a whiny little ......
Yours,
Kropotkin
As long as its consensual, I see no harm.
Lets leave the promoting of the sport to say, …the…promoters, shall we.
“Passing the time until I finally die….”, uhm, melodramatic much?
Regardless, don’t expect me to agree with everything you post, as I’m still at odds with you over this use of the ........ lazy “alien” concept. You’re simply wrong on this one.
You Netherlandians are so enlightened!
F1 is car racing. Everybody can relate to holding a steering wheel (however illusory that feeling may be). Driving a car on the highways, everybody also becomes familiar with fighting off sleep... So the masses are perfectly trained for appreciating F1
For motorcycle racing, you need a good show and some real on-track rivalry and real or contrived off-track drama (yes, a la Rossi... even my grandmother knows who he is) to attract those who don't ride and cannot immediately relate to just holding handlebars, opening throttle with the right wrist and leaning into corners. It looks fantastic to us, but non-bikers remain indifferent. And the 'pure prototype' excitement is confined to an even smaller, esoteric circle of worshippers...
But instead of agreeing with the reality of the sport, you are more than happy to preach a false narrative that all of a sudden, we dont have have fender bashing start to finish racing. That is not reality. The reality is, a handful of new age riders have reached a plateau that is so precise, it should be celebrated, not scorned. Same with the bikes and the eggheads that build them. Like MA said, instead of concentrating on Dorna's narrative, educate people on how damn near impossible it is to ride at these limits for 45 minutes without making a mistake. Write articles for the casual fan who has no idea how exceptionally talented these guys really are who can pull off damn near impossible week after week. That is what they should be selling, not rules changes that take us back to a mythical era that never existed.
Krop doesn't often waste his time with irrelevant abstracts, like the true history of the sport,
Food taboos are funny. People balk at the idea of eating insects, and yet will die for lobster and shrimp. Shrimp are basically the cockroaches of the sea.
Every Sunday (at Euro rounds at least) I sit in a room full of other journos and watch 3 races. The first two are accompanied by a lot of shouting, cheering and banter. The final one takes place to the sound of silence.
At least in the old days, when Doohan was dominating during one of the most tedious periods of motorcycle racing, the bikes looked really hard to ride.
I suppose I can always go off and write about a different sport, a properly pure sport. Like cycling or something.
Now you're stealing my lines? I've been saying this for years. I don't eat crustacean for that very same reason. Bottom dwellers who spend their whole lives eating quite literally everybody's .... (that is ...., as in feces). Btw, I also use to not eat pork, until I went to the UK, seems I couldn't eat anything unless I had some swine. Speaking of which, how about cheese? We artificially induce some nasty ... white secretion from a field animal, let it sit until it coagulates, quite literally becomes rancid with rot, and then eat the .....
Mental said if its a riders series then promote the riders. All of them. What tangent are you on? Its very simple, you cant answer it with economics, more to do with tribalism and primitive human emotions. Kroppo is from England, so is Crutchlow. Where's the article on Crutchlow? I know little about him, there's very little written about him. By comparison there's a lot written about Carmello. The question is why?
I love shrimp, and do not care that they eat faeces and other detritus. One of the greatest ironies is that lobster, that great delicacy, basically lives on rotting fish corpses.
As for cheese, my personal favorites are blue cheeses, which is basically mouldy milk.
....... Dorna? Are you kidding me?
Let me get this straight. You and Mental accuse Krop of being unreasonable b/c he criticizes MotoGP. The non-hypocritical solution, naturally, is to criticize Krop and Dorna for criticizing MotoGP.
Then you say that solution for unreasonable criticism (in your opinion) is to embrace tribalism and primitive human behavior (unreason). When Krop's already unreasonable behavior (in your mind) doesn't make reasonable sense to you, you demand to know why?!
You and Mental want journalists to function as unpaid advertisers, and you want 'primitive human emotions' to be regular, predictable, and easy to manipulate. I don't know what to tell you. Seek psychological help?
Still on that tangent. Since you're so interested, yes I have sought psychological help. Diagnosis, only mildly psychopathic, yet more than a little psychotic. How about you Dr Lex?
Enough of that. Are the origins and continued human attachment with sports in general, specifically these sporting 'heroes' we tend to worship, be better defined by economic theory of maximised social benefits. Maybe. Imo the origins are far more primitive, as in humans are social beings who once gathered around great tribal leaders, fierce warriors, men or women bleased with amazing physical abilities that we could all admire.
Sports are tribal man. The successful ones that recognise the social aspect as the core of existence are economically viable even with ever expanding costs. The ones that dont are in dire need of cost cutting.
Rossi's genius was that a: he realized that he needed a villain to play off, and created them in the shape of Max Biaggi and then Casey Stoner, and b: he was so confident in his ability to beat the opposition that he could afford to play with them. In the years prior to 2006, he only showed his hand once, in what I regard as his best performance, Phillip Island 2003, where he basically dropped his laptime by three quarters of a second a lap when he had to make up time.
The villain thing ...
I think very few genuinely hate rossi.