This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

valentino NOT gay

Status
Archived
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Helix @ Oct 15 2008, 05:14 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>You want people to be tolerant of your intolerance, a bit contradictory that, isn't it?
<

You want me to be tolerant of abhorant behavior so why not?
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Goatboy @ Oct 15 2008, 07:52 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Ah I see, so you were saying that Liberals in the U.S want to pursue a policy of expansion. I see.

& I have to get a clue? Wow, aren't you just eveything that's wrong with America
<


I predict another locked thread
<

YEah great expand the govt. We will see where that gets anyone. Do you care or just follow? You might want to change your name to SHEEPboy or Baaaah instead of goatboy.
 
i new this geezer years ago and he had a dog. we were up the reck (park) and his dog was running about chasing the ball ect . all of a sudden his dog saw another dog and ran after it. his dog mounted this dog and started to hump it. he was shouting at his dog "go on my son, .... her brains out" with this the owner of the other dog said to him " its is not a her my dog is male and your dog is bumming it".

of course we all laughed and took the piss like you would but the next day we were horrified to learn that he took his dog home and beat it to death for being a gay dog. now thats a real momophobe not a bit of banter and a few names.

anyway back on topic, the only peeps ive ever heard implying rossi is a ............ are a few rossi haters on this forum, its just banter, they all know he has had more totty that they could ever dream about
<
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (roger-m @ Oct 15 2008, 05:22 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>i new this geezer years ago and he had a dog. we were up the reck (park) and his dog was running about chasing the ball ect . all of a sudden his dog saw another dog and ran after it. his dog mounted this dog and started to hump it. he was shouting at his dog "go on my son, .... her brains out" with this the owner of the other dog said to him " its is not a her my dog is male and your dog is bumming it".

of course we all laughed and took the piss like you would but the next day we were horrified to learn that he took his dog home and beat it to death for being a gay dog. now thats a real momophobe not a bit of banter and a few names.

anyway back on topic, the only peeps ive ever heard implying rossi is a ............ are a few rossi haters on this forum, its just banter, they all know he has had more totty that they could ever dream about
<

NOw that is straight ...... up. That other dog must have been a tranny. LOL. That is inhumane to beat the dog like that. Likewise the same could be said for anyone doing harm to someone that is gay by beating the crap out of them for who they are. I am NOT for .... like that.

A childhood friend of mine had a french poodle who was a male and did the same thing. My friends mom was laughing so hard cause she was yelling at the dogs sayind you stupid dog that is a boy.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (roger-m @ Oct 15 2008, 06:22 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>i new this geezer years ago and he had a dog. we were up the reck (park) and his dog was running about chasing the ball ect . all of a sudden his dog saw another dog and ran after it. his dog mounted this dog and started to hump it. he was shouting at his dog "go on my son, .... her brains out" with this the owner of the other dog said to him " its is not a her my dog is male and your dog is bumming it".

of course we all laughed and took the piss like you would but the next day we were horrified to learn that he took his dog home and beat it to death for being a gay dog. now thats a real momophobe not a bit of banter and a few names.

anyway back on topic, the only peeps ive ever heard implying rossi is a ............ are a few rossi haters on this forum, its just banter, they all know he has had more totty that they could ever dream about
<


That really is horrific, how could anyone do that to an animal?
How could anyone think a dog was gay?
Everyone knows that dogs will hump anything, male, female, legs, even geese if R1SF's post in the motivator thread is real.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Jumkie @ Oct 14 2008, 03:39 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Valentino is definitely gay and Uccio is his lover, plain as day. Rockdog is not gay, because gays are usually very intelligent, talented, and tolerant.

Oh, as far as "Yanks" being homophobes, you are only talking about the Republican half of the nation, and these are mostly closet gays who fiercely deflect from their own homosexual tendency. Poor frustrated .......s.


hahahahha. damnit jumkie. you always crack me up.

anytime you're in my neck of the woods, you're welcome to stop by.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (djm @ Oct 15 2008, 07:53 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>hahahahha. damnit jumkie. you always crack me up.

anytime you're in my neck of the woods, you're welcome to stop by.
careful jumkie, might be a shirt lifter looking for ...
<
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (J4rn0 @ Oct 14 2008, 05:02 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Weel done Brubi46, too bad these guys are too busy shouting 'gay' at each other to notice your linky...
Hey, have a look at Milo Manara's beautiful girls, you misguided cowboys..
Oh please, Michael Jackson paraded with plenty of hot chicks in his time, he even has two kids, and I doubt people would make a case he isn't gay.

Valentino is gay, deal with it.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (djm @ Oct 15 2008, 11:53 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>hahahahha. damnit jumkie. you always crack me up.

anytime you're in my neck of the woods, you're welcome to stop by.
And where might that be?

Likewise, your invited for a beer in So Cal. (That is if we get through these freaking fires again).
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ROCKGOD01 @ Oct 15 2008, 06:02 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Every chance I get huh? well go read and look at who starts the .... by calling me names and such, you gonna defend me? Just cause your going to hell and don't believe its not my fault. If you associate with ....'s that is cool it doesn't make you gay. Unless you start blowin one of them. And look at you name calling me so your NO better you fuckhead. Seriously I think if your gay whatever that is your choice. Some people choose to be terrorists. I think that the gays in the world that are not trying to put that .... in peoples faces are ok I just think that it is wrong. If everyone was gay there would be noone since it doesn't work that way. It just goes against the natural way of things that is all. I am glad to see your such a proponent for your friends and their lifestyle. And as far as hiding my kids from it I won't do that but I also think that it is my right not to have them subjected to it at a childrens amusement park. That is just wrong. So I know I sound harsh but you don't hear inflection with the typed word so don't think you know so much. Oh and as for HEaven and hell well if your wrong then I guess your really wrong. But your gonna want to go to hell with your friends since your so close to them it would be so wrong to keep you apart. Oh and one more thing ........ I don't have to like, condone, tolerate .... from anyone especially ....'s, so far it is still a free country. Just cause I don't agree with it doesn't make me a redneck or any of that derogatory .... you called me. Again your no better so get off your high horse cause your not movin anywhere and your no better than me or anyone else.

Wow RG in typical fashion you totally missed the point of my post and went on the defensive with your typical vulgar diatribe. I'll get back to my point in a moment

I called what you had to say ......... I only called you one name, "crazy redneck". Redneck being the insult because of how you are acting and crazy being your state of mind. You called me a ........ and a fuckhead and made reference that I could be gay because I accept people that chose to have a different lifestyle than mine.
Come on man, who's the guy thats really on his high horse here. Banishing me to hell
<
, well let me tell you brother, if I'm going to hell then I will be seeing you there, because if you are anything like the person you portray here in your posts you will be there for sure. You already showed how low you are willing to steep with your spitefullness in a recent thread, and just how insulting you can be to anyone that challenge's what you have to say, rather than being civil and debating them in a respectful tone. Well that is anything but being Christian. You know turn the other cheek, but were no fools here man we can see you for what you really are.

Now back to the point I made which has to be spelt out for you like the child you are.

I never said you had to "like, condone, tolerate" anything or anyone. I have a problem with you coming on here, and ok not in every thread but in any where gays are mention(which seems to be more and more lately) you make your hatred clear(you made it clear months ago) with your obscenities. If you don't I assume you must have missed that thread. You talk about preserving your childs innocents, which I respect you for, but what if your child or someones elses logs on here and reads the language you use. Would you like your child to read and to use that type of language? If your child or a blood relative told you that they were gay would you be as quick to banish them to hell also?
So yes, my point is if you don't like it fine, noone is asking you to like it, I am however asking you to tone down the abuse, don't come on here and let fly with your crap thinking how great you are and how these people or anyone that is fine with how they chose to live is condemned to burn in hell for all eternity. We know where you stand on the issue but yet you find it necessary to repeat yourself all the time. This is a motorcycle forum where literally everything and anything gets discussed (another quality that sets it apart from other forums), but that gives you no right to abuse people.

If you don't like things in your society be more active about it, we can see how much you like to put you hatred in print, so you don't like gays in Disney Land write a email to Mr Disney, you don't like gays prancing around on TV write a email to the network, you don't like gays write a email to God and tell him to sort it out.

I'm sure your going to miss the point again and go off on one of your usual vulgar rants, but thats ok. Its what I've come to expect from you
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Jumkie @ Oct 15 2008, 08:36 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Oh please, Michael Jackson paraded with plenty of hot chicks in his time, he even has two kids, and I doubt people would make a case he isn't gay.

Valentino is gay, deal with it.
<
dont see haystack with to many chicks either
<
, bender for sure mate. deal with it !
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (johnny @ Oct 15 2008, 12:45 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Wow RG in typical fashion you totally missed the point
Johnny, I would give up if I were you. This guy has already been at the center of one closed thread, lets not make it two. Its obvious what he is about, and we know you mean good, but some people just won't have it. Let it go and chalk it up to a defect in natural selection of the human species.
 
My wifes gaydar says Valentino is gay and she's got nothing against the guy. She's actually a fan. I could care less one way or the other. Do they allow the gay marriage over there in Italy?

Here in California the people voted that gay Marriage should not be allowed. it was overwhelming, something like 65-35 against gay marriage. Then some phony judge panel overturned the vote of the people. What kind of democracy is that? Whats wrong with these judges? Once again it's on the ticket for us to vote on again. I get the feeling that it will be much closer this time as these special interest groups are shoving it down our throat to accept it. Both sides are spending millions on their campaign. I wonder if the vote passes, will the judges overturn the ruling again?
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (roger-m @ Oct 15 2008, 12:46 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>
<
dont see haystack with to many chicks either!
Haha, I think we had this conversation already. But ok, poor Valentino's fans don't let him come out the closet.
<
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Jumkie @ Oct 15 2008, 08:55 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Johnny, I would give up if I were you. This guy has already been at the center of one closed thread, lets not make it two. Its obvious what he is about, and we know you mean good, but some people just won't have it. Let it go and chalk it up to a defect in natural selection of the human species.

Ya lesson learned. Ignorance is bliss

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (SackWack @ Oct 15 2008, 08:55 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>My wifes gaydar says Valentino is gay and she's got nothing against the guy. She's actually a fan. I could care less one way or the other. Do they allow the gay marriage over there in Italy?

Here in California the people voted that gay Marriage should not be allowed. it was overwhelming, something like 65-35 against gay marriage. Then some phony judge panel overturned the vote of the people. What kind of democracy is that? Whats wrong with these judges? Once again it's on the ticket for us to vote on again. I get the feeling that it will be much closer this time as these special interest groups are shoving it down our throat to accept it. Both sides are spending millions on their campaign. I wonder if the vote passes, will the judges overturn the ruling again?

I must say RG take note of the above post and see how a mature adult puts their point out there, Sackwack obviously shares similar feelings on the subject as you, but did he insult anyone? No. Did he come across as all high and mighty, No.
As Tom would say "the question here is" will RG ever learn?
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (johnny @ Oct 15 2008, 08:45 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Wow RG in typical fashion you totally missed the point of my post and went on the defensive with your typical vulgar diatribe. I'll get back to my point in a moment

I called what you had to say ......... I only called you one name, "crazy redneck". Redneck being the insult because of how you are acting and crazy being your state of mind. You called me a ........ and a fuckhead and made reference that I could be gay because I accept people that chose to have a different lifestyle than mine.
Come on man, who's the guy thats really on his high horse here. Banishing me to hell
<
, well let me tell you brother, if I'm going to hell then I will be seeing you there, because if you are anything like the person you portray here in your posts you will be there for sure. You already showed how low you are willing to steep with your spitefullness in a recent thread, and just how insulting you can be to anyone that challenge's what you have to say, rather than being civil and debating them in a respectful tone. Well that is anything but being Christian. You know turn the other cheek, but were no fools here man we can see you for what you really are.

Now back to the point I made which has to be spelt out for you like the child you are.

I never said you had to "like, condone, tolerate" anything or anyone. I have a problem with you coming on here, and ok not in every thread but in any where gays are mention(which seems to be more and more lately) you make your hatred clear(you made it clear months ago) with your obscenities. If you don't I assume you must have missed that thread. You talk about preserving your childs innocents, which I respect you for, but what if your child or someones elses logs on here and reads the language you use. Would you like your child to read and to use that type of language? If your child or a blood relative told you that they were gay would you be as quick to banish them to hell also?
So yes, my point is if you don't like it fine, noone is asking you to like it, I am however asking you to tone down the abuse, don't come on here and let fly with your crap thinking how great you are and how these people or anyone that is fine with how they chose to live is condemned to burn in hell for all eternity. We know where you stand on the issue but yet you find it necessary to repeat yourself all the time. This is a motorcycle forum where literally everything and anything gets discussed (another quality that sets it apart from other forums), but that gives you no right to abuse people.

If you don't like things in your society be more active about it, we can see how much you like to put you hatred in print, so you don't like gays in Disney Land write a email to Mr Disney, you don't like gays prancing around on TV write a email to the network, you don't like gays write a email to God and tell him to sort it out.

I'm sure your going to miss the point again and go off on one of your usual vulgar rants, but thats ok. Its what I've come to expect from you
YEah ok I missed the point. Like your so complicated. Your point was taken and understood. The mere fact that you feel for some reason I just come out of left field with this stuff is wrong. When I get called a name or someone starts .... I will not be quiet and just take it. So I defend myself. when it gets deeper and further away from the original topic that is where it gets stupid and for me quite boring since I need to defend my position on my choices and the things I hold dear. No I will not be in hell but you very well might be. I don't abuse anyone I just merely state my feelings on the matter since there is so much intrest in this ...... topic. The small details you keep pointing out are just the small tips of the iceberg as to why I feel the way I do about the gay community. We are all gods people and I do love and pray for us all. I don't think you even give a .... but there you have it. Plus I don't see any 5 year olds on this site so as far as my language among OTHERS this is for adults and you all were swearing on here long before I got here. For one there is NO abuse as you say and if you want to stop this topic of discussion just ask politely I would much rather keep it to MOTO GP. IF you keep the .... up I am not going to take it so just be prepared. I am not here trying to piss people off but go back and read with an unbiased eye and mind and you will see I never start it I get called .... and I just don't take it, although if I am joking with someone and you don't get it sorry. Anyway Vale is NOT gay it is just fun to joke about it oH and so you know. I have an aunt that is gay and has a life partner who is a wonderful person and she loves my kids. She knows I don't approve of her lifestyle but no one gives a ..... WE don't put her down in any mean spirited way so when you read the things on here you may see them one way but are not meant to hurt just meant to spite and give some back to those who seek to take jabs at me. Anyway I appricitate your comments and the want to keep it toned down so as long as I don't get called names you won't hear me coming back with rebuttals that are making fun of gays. PEace to all I mean no harm and hope all is well for everyone, even the gays. OK LETS PLEASE GET TO MOTO FRIGGIN GP!!!!!
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (SackWack @ Oct 15 2008, 12:55 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Here in California the people voted that gay Marriage should not be allowed.
Very typical Republican tactic--put some non-important issues on ballots to distracted people from the fact that every time they have been in charge, the economy tanks, national debt goes up, we get involved in unjust wars, and the corporate executives are bailed out. They simply do this for people to talk about how gays are a problem in society so we don’t talk about who are the real leaches of the nation.

Here is an interesting fact; the highest divorce rate is among Republican conservative Christians! That is a fact Jack! These are the most vocal people against gay rights and try to make laws to supposedly "protect the sanctity of marriage". Guess what group has the lowest divorce rates, agnostics and atheist (this group is typified by gay people). Interesting isn't it? The group most vocal and organized to put up laws trying to “protect marriage” is the same one most trampling it. One of the reasons they propose making such laws is to “protect children” from being educated about gay life styles (as if this will automatically make them gay) but the irony is that they destroy more family units through divorce which hurts children. Isn’t this amazing? The very same people saying they want to protect kids are the ones with the highest divorce rates breaking up families! Typically these are republicans who say government should be out of the people's lives. Yet, it this party which "conservative Christians" belong to that have thrust government into business by nationalized Wall Street at unprecedented rates. So they only want government in our lives when its time for us taxes payers to bail out the rich but not when they want to extend equal rights to the entire population. For these Republican conservative Christians it’s ok for government to be in the lives of gays by impeding their unions. What a sick double standard of this party that claims the moral high ground. Maybe we should introduce a law for republican conservative Christians to be penalized with double taxes if they get divorced since they like to introduce these laws that supposedly are to "protect" marriage. I'm sure the extra taxes they are surely to give up would help pay down the out of control debt habits that have been the theme of all their administrations.

Sacky, its obvious you don't know your history, as you question democracy. But there were plenty of laws voted into the books to suppress Black people during the early part of this country. There are plenty of Jim Crow laws to indicate that people "voted" for laws that were unconstitutional.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Jumkie @ Oct 15 2008, 09:32 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Very typical Republican tactic--put some non-important issues on ballots to distracted people from the fact that every time they have been in charge, the economy tanks, national debt goes up, we get involved in unjust wars, and the corporate executives are bailed out. They simply do this for people to talk about how gays are a problem in society so we don’t talk about who are the real leaches of the nation.

Here is an interesting fact; the highest divorce rate is among Republican conservative Christians! That is a fact Jack! These are the most vocal people against gay rights and try to make laws to supposedly "protect the sanctity of marriage". Guess what group has the lowest divorce rates, agnostics and atheist (this group is typified by gay people). Interesting isn't it? The group most vocal and organized to put up laws trying to “protect marriage” is the same one most trampling it. One of the reasons they propose making such laws is to “protect children” from being educated about gay life styles (as if this will automatically make them gay) but the irony is that they destroy more family units through divorce which hurts children. Isn’t this amazing? The very same people saying they want to protect kids are the ones with the highest divorce rates breaking up families! Typically these are republicans who say government should be out of the people's lives. Yet, it this party which "conservative Christians" belong to that have thrust government into business by nationalized Wall Street at unprecedented rates. So they only want government in our lives when its time for us taxes payers to bail out the rich but not when they want to extend equal rights to the entire population. For these Republican conservative Christians it’s ok for government to be in the lives of gays by impeding their unions. What a sick double standard of this party that claims the moral high ground. Maybe we should introduce a law for republican conservative Christians to be penalized with double taxes if they get divorced since they like to introduce these laws that supposedly are to "protect" marriage. I'm sure the extra taxes they are surely to give up would help pay down the out of control debt habits that have been the theme of all their administrations.

Sacky, its obvious you don't know your history, as you question democracy. But there were plenty of laws voted into the books to suppress Black people during the early part of this country. There are plenty of Jim Crow laws to indicate that people "voted" for laws that were unconstitutional.
Dude kids should NEVER have to be subjected to it for the mere fact it brings up queestions they shouldn't have to ask, at least yet.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ROCKGOD01 @ Oct 15 2008, 01:35 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Dude kids should NEVER have to be subjected to it for the mere fact it brings up queestions they shouldn't have to ask, at least yet.
But its ok to talk about heterosexual unions with kids? What is the difference?

(I'm talking about age appropriated conversations here).
 
Status
Archived

Recent Discussions