Gaz, if you ever do business with Japanese people they are not open to bitchfests , not even remotely, I'm not on any side when I say this but I'll say it again and put it slightly different. If Jorge had toed the company line the celebration would have took place somehow. Japanese and honour go hand in hand.
I posted at the time of the Sepang race that Jorge's response to events at Sepang whilst understandable and even justifiable imo was far from politically astute, and from a Yamaha viewpoint it was understandable they wouldn't like one salaried employee presumably (I guess obviously) without their sanction involving himself in action by RD et al against another salaried employee. Part of all this is the fiction maintained about the sport in general, but by Honda and Yamaha in particular that this is a team sport, when all anyone is really interested in, especially leading riders like Rossi, Lorenzo and MM are individual goals, paramount among them the riders' title.
In the end Jorge's "attitude" did not influence the title outcome which he won by on-track performances, and that Yamaha cancelled a scheduled victory celebration because of this, or even more so that they were justified in doing so is drawing a rather longer bow however. If they considered him to have committed an egregious breach of his contract they should have sacked him or not offered him a new contract. Unless the new contract was a sham, cancelling the title celebration yet expecting him to take up the offer of a new contract would seem strange business practice even for the inscrutable Japanese. The opposing hypothesis to yours, and your view is also only an hypothesis, is that they did it to placate Rossi, in the process (intentionally or not) tacitly endorsing his view of events, and thought Jorge had no option but to stay with them.
My issue with you in this thread is that from a stance of supposedly dispassionately arguing the facts, you (perhaps displaying your own real attitude) ventured into discussion of Jorge's "bad attitude", his apparent tendency to "polarise opinions", at the very least irrelevant as well as a splinters and logs situation given the attitude Rossi had been displaying and was continuing to display, and that Jorge was guilty of "hubris". I will ask more politely, in what way was he guilty of hubris, other than by wanting to win the title just as much as Rossi did?
Otherwise see Gaz's post. JL has not maligned Yamaha at all to my knowledge, and even in announcing his move to Ducati was gracious about Yamaha, which has not necessarily been the case with other riders making such moves.