I just can't take the Stoner bashing seriously. All this sour grapes is so transparent and childish that it just doesn't seem worth commenting on.
Its about double standard.
Downplaying the champ saying he might consider an early exit is news. For better or worse, the champ's words at any level is news. Suddenly its just hating or mountains out of mole hills, or as you put it "sour grapes" etc., but its just an attempt to downplay the comments that were out of wack (something not uncommon for Stoner). But its all comes down to double standards. So far just about every Stoner fan and the neo-bopper here has found nothing in his comments, yet
the fact remains, he suggested an early exit (this is not disputed, is it?). Again, when the champion of a series says he considers leaving the sport for whatever reason, its news, and his intentions scrutinized. But you guys want to convince us it didn't happen, or its some ulterior motive we harbor? I'll tell you what is "transparent and childish", to read the man's comments and wholly dismiss it, or as is suggested, 'to read between the lines' on one hand but argue 'he's a straight talker' on the other, because its your guy saying it and find some way to downplay his words.
This point cannot be argued, so you guys turn to these options:
1. Downplay (Its nothing, no big deal)
2. Interpret his words ("read between the lines" Maybe he didn't mean it, except he says what he means...)
3. Its just Stoner hate (the favorite because its the easiest lazy option to discredit without alternated reason)
4. If you recognize he meant what he said, then the argument turns to his motives are lofty (double standard, see Rossi).