This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Stoner critical of Hayden

Interesting, you'v acted all the ........ that Stoner's outburst displayed. (Ad Hominem) You've deployed every possible fallacy on this thread

Bunny, with very little thought except to say that when Hayden said "good things happen to good people" you got "offended" and equated it to Stoner's thoughtless childlike outburst. Lame. Why you questioning Michaelm, I suppose you'd like him to be fused to your lack of logic? Is it because he hasn't blindedly defended Stoner's comment like you? Your appeal to authority (another fallacy), even Kropo agreed Stoner was being a ..... (Though he added his take on what he "really meant"...). Stoner had a .... take, 14 pages later (as Kropo protests) is a result of defenders of his comments taking two forms: people desperate to convince us what he 'actually said' wasn't what he 'actually' meant, which is the point, don't say stupid .... in public as it make you look like a ....; and 2, what's the problem, all riders are dicks (which I guess makes his comments ok). Continue defending it as 'stoner being stoner', based on your poor reasoning, its obvious you don't understand why that is uncomplimentary. Stoner made a declarative statement, its you crusading mindlessly that its ok or tantamount to something you've got zero support (equating it as offensive to Nicky's relief when he won the title, hahaha that sure make you look stupid!) Shall I look up quotes from Rossi you've .... all over? Would you like to go back and retract your statements every time he said something unbecoming about Stoner? You know why Boppers get so much ....? Because they can never distinguish between right wrong myth or reality logic or fallacy. They blindly worship. You have demonstrated that here by trying to gloss over what clearly was a ........ childish verbal outburst. I've never accused Stoner of being a whiner, never, my point here has been consistent, that his lashing out was uncalled for and had the emotional equal of a 13 year old girl. That's what you are defending. You've defended Stone's comments as oh its ok, not that bad. Sure, you've mildly covered your bases, but its a tactic to qualify it to advance your own mindless agenda. Bunyip, I wouldn't be arguing with the Bopper, you're no better or you're mind has taken a vacation on this thread.

Dont you find it ironic that it was the stoner fan's who first coined the phrase "boppers"? These stoner fans are as blinded by their fanboyisum as the worst rossi bopper ! Every race stone does or says something. Every race the same old faces excuse him blindly
 
Dont you find it ironic that it was the stoner fan's who first coined the phrase "boppers"? These stoner fans are as blinded by their fanboyisum as the worst rossi bopper ! Every race stone does or says something. Every race the same old faces excuse him blindly





Thank the stars, Preziosi, JB, VR, Bozo the Clown, or whom the .... ever - for the Duc 11.1 news and hopefully the end of this ..... slapper thread
 
Dont you find it ironic that it was the stoner fan's who first coined the phrase "boppers"? These stoner fans are as blinded by their fanboyisum as the worst rossi bopper ! Every race stone does or says something. Every race the same old faces excuse him blindly

Well, I've always made the distinction between Rossi fans and "boppers'. Honestly, its really two camps: X fans vs X mindless people. Its easy enough to distinguish when incidents happen that are right & wrong in this world. The gray incidents are difficult and people are given a bit of measure on their opinions. Its the interpretation of rather clear incidents that seem to separate the camps. Here we have a case where Stoner says something out of whack. Then you have peeps like Bunny saying, well its just as bad as this other person that said something totally unrelated. Then attempts for several posts to defend his ridiculous comparison. There would be now discussion if peeps would have said, "yeah, that was over the top, shouldn't have done it." and move on. No 14 pages. The 14 pages is because the quote was suddenly up for debate. We all read what he said. WTF is the problem? Its as clear as day. I even gave Bunny an out, and said, well all say stupid things, we should recognize it and learn from it. But no, Bunny wants to continue his gloss routine. Polishing a turd. Then Bunny goes into a post comparing Stoner's frustration to killing dogs? How the hell do I respond to that?!?



Can I give an analogy.........

You have 16 pet dogs and you live on a busy street ( and in this city fences don,t exist). You keep asking your neighbours not to drive too fast , because when they do, they run over and kill one of your dogs. This has been happening for a few years and your dogs keep getting hit and killed. Your best mate Nicky , who lives next door has been careful and not harmed any of your dogs to date. Finally you only have one dog left. One day you come home and you find your last dog has been run over and killed by Nicky. How do you think you are going to behave with Nicky. Are you going to go easy on him? Of course not........."I mean Nicky, you of all people, I can,t believe it...........................shheesh you must have done it deliberately!! " You get crankier with your mates because you DO expect better from them and the shock and disappointment is greater. Can,t you see that???



HELP PLEASE!!!
 
Interesting, you'v acted all the ........ that Stoner's outburst displayed. (Ad Hominem) You've deployed every possible fallacy on this thread. Bunny, with very little thought except to say that when Hayden said "good things happen to good people" you got "offended" and equated it to Stoner's thoughtless childlike outburst. Lame. Why you questioning Michaelm, I suppose you'd like him to be fused to your lack of logic too? Is it because he hasn't blindedly defended Stoner's comments by equating it to common statement of relief when Hayden won his title? Your appeal to authority (another fallacy), even Kropo agreed Stoner was being a ..... (Though he added his take on what he "really meant"...). Stoner had a .... take, 14 pages later (as Kropo protests) is a result of defenders of his comments taking two forms: people desperate to convince us what he 'actually said' wasn't what he 'actually' meant (not sure how this is a good thing, as adults we usually are expected to say what we mean), which is the point, don't say stupid .... in public as it make you look like a .... if its an attack; and 2, what's the problem, all riders are dicks (which I guess makes his comments ok?)--genius reasoning folks. Continue defending it as 'stoner being stoner', based on your poor reasoning, its obvious you don't understand why that is uncomplimentary. Stoner made a declarative statement, its you crusading mindlessly that its ok or tantamount to something you've got zero support (equating it as offensive to Nicky's relief when he won the title saying "good things happen to good people", hahaha that sure make you look stupid! Take a poll Bunny, find out how many people were offended by that, or would equate it to Stoner accusing people in every corner out to get him--you sound as paranoid as him) Shall I look up quotes from Rossi you've .... all over? Would you like to go back and retract your statements every time he said something unbecoming about Stoner? You know why Boppers get so much ....? Because they can never distinguish between right wrong myth or reality logic or fallacy. They blindly worship. You have demonstrated that here by trying to gloss over what clearly was a ........ childish verbal outburst. I've never accused Stoner of being a whiner, never, my point here has been consistent, that his lashing out was uncalled for and had the emotional equal of a 13 year old girl. That's what you are defending. You've defended Stone's comments as oh its ok, not that bad. Sure, you've mildly covered your bases, but its a tactic to qualify it to advance your own mindless agenda. Bunyip, I wouldn't be arguing with the Bopper, you're no better or you're mind has taken a vacation on this thread.





Now that we are in the habit of grading each others posts, I would have to say that this is one of your worst posts. No evidence of your usually incisive analysis? You have descended into Talpa-like childish admonishments. You,ve made sweeping statements with no corroboration. What,s going on? I have replied to you with respect, whilst only introducing ,as you would say " lame irony", in the attempt to inject some humour.



And what is "my mindless agenda" ?? Thats a new one.........tell me so I know?
<
 
]Then Bunny goes into a post comparing Stoner's frustration to killing dogs?[/i] How the hell do I respond to that?!?





You,ve never not tried before, so whats different now?



You don,t respond because you can,t, because you know theres a whole lot of truth in that analogy. A truth you don,t want to admit...................
<
 
Now that we are in the habit of grading each others posts, I would have to say that this is one of your worst posts. No evidence of your usually incisive analysis? You have decended into Talpa-like childish admonishments. You,ve made sweeping statements with no corroboration. What,s going on? I have replied to you with respect, whilst only introducing ,as you would say " lame irony", in the attempt to inject some humour.



And what is "my mindless agenda" ?? Thats a new one.........tell me so I know?
<



Did you notice I put in parenthesis (Ad Hominem)? That’s because I’m done reasoning with you. I put Ad Hominem to alert you that I am now employing the fallacy. You’ve been unreasonable on this thread. Why should I keep writing reasonably? Haha, not quite dude. Can I go back and say, I'm just trying to get a rise out of you then admit not really in the very same post?
 
HELP PLEASE!!!

[/quote]





Does that mean you are admitting defeat?







I,ve never been any good at debating................so I,ll take it as my first win
<
 
Well, I've always made the distinction between Rossi fans and "boppers'. Honestly, its really two camps: X fans vs X mindless people. Its easy enough to distinguish when incidents happen that are right & wrong in this world. The gray incidents are difficult and people are given a bit of measure on their opinions. Its the interpretation of rather clear incidents that seem to separate the camps. Here we have a case where Stoner says something out of whack. Then you have peeps like Bunny saying, well its just as bad as this other person that said something totally unrelated. Then attempts for several posts to defend his ridiculous comparison. There would be now discussion if peeps would have said, "yeah, that was over the top, shouldn't have done it." and move on. No 14 pages. The 14 pages is because the quote was suddenly up for debate. We all read what he said. WTF is the problem? Its as clear as day. I even gave Bunny an out, and said, well all say stupid things, we should recognize it and learn from it. But no, Bunny wants to continue his gloss routine. Polishing a turd. Then Bunny goes into a post comparing Stoner's frustration to killing dogs? How the hell do I respond to that?!?







HELP PLEASE!!!

Well it was clear enough to me when casey stuck the boot in on checa's bike while on track. Then capi, then being trackside to mock rossi, them punching RDP ect ect ect. These were clear examples of the mans personality and the respect he had for his fellow competitor's. I was consistent in my judgments but ... well that's just use that beautiful word again "Ad Hominem" (thank's Krop). This lack of respect towards Hayden is just another example to me and im not surprised some see no wrong (as usual).
 
You,ve never not tried before, so whats different now?



You don,t respond because you can,t, because you know theres a whole lot of truth in that analogy. A truth you don,t want to admit...................
<

Ok, you're right, there's lots to be learned from your 'Nicky killing somebody's last dog' analogy. I'm just not smart enough to understand it. You win.



Bye.
 
Did you notice I put in parenthesis (Ad Hominem)? That’s because I’m done reasoning with you. I put Ad Hominem to alert you that I am now employing the fallacy. You’ve been unreasonable on this thread. Why should I keep writing reasonably? Haha, not quite dude. Can I go back and say, I'm just trying to get a rise out of you then admit not really in the very same post?





"Done reasoning"- because there is no reason you can use.........



I,ve been unreasonable................thats a new take on discussions.............and you are the pinnacle of being reasonable...yeah (irony)



And the only rise I got, wasn,t from you, and it ended up making my wife very happy........
<
 
"Done reasoning"- because there is no reason you can use.........



I,ve been unreasonable................thats a new take on discussions.............and you are the pinnacle of being reasonable...yeah (irony)



And the only rise I got, wasn,t from you, and it ended up making my wife very happy........
<

Well we seem to have turned to personal banter as opposed to the thread topic.

I was surprised to read Fizzles post in this thread and i have great respect for him for making it. He is like you a stoner die-hard. He has on many occasions looked for the positive in his fav rider dispite many pointing out his short falls. Surely you have to see stoner is out-of-order again ? What would he have to do to push you over the edge ? Or are you die-hard till the end ??
 
Well we seem to have turned to personal banter as opposed to the thread topic.

I was surprised to read Fizzles post in this thread and i have great respect for him for making it. He is like you a stoner die-hard. He has on many occasions looked for the positive in his fav rider dispite many pointing out his short falls. Surely you have to see stoner is out-of-order again ? What would he have to do to push you over the edge ? Or are you die-hard till the end ??



I agree, Stoner was out of order. I keep saying it and your mob keeps ignoring it.



My dog analogy is just an insight into Caseys thinking about Nicky, and why he reacted in a much worse fashion than you may have expected. None of these riders are "evil people", they are fallable human beings who react in different ways. Casey needs a bit of love, and if I,m the last one, I don,t care.....
 
I agree, Stoner was out of order. I keep saying it and your mob keeps ignoring it.



My dog analogy is just an insight into Caseys thinking about Nicky, and why he reacted in a much worse fashion than you may have expected. None of these riders are "evil people", they are fallable human beings who react in different ways. Casey needs a bit of love, and if I,m the last one, I don,t care.....

<
<
<
who exactly are "my mob"?

Casey doesn't need love. He needs a good hiding. In the real world you just would not get away with treating people like he does and that's a fact !

Personally i don't have much of a problem with racers insulting each other, but its always going to get your back up when its your fav being insulted. My problem with casey has always been his on track antics. Not to harp on the past i will stick to this particular incident. I have no real problem with what casey said to nicky as im not a fan and i just proves the bitchy side of his personality which we have seen before. This is not unique to stoner, rossi also has this trait although more calculated. My problem was stoner then blocking nicky for the next couple of turns in a show of anger and revenge. The same as kicking riders bikes, punching them ect. Funny how some of you excuse this but in some martyrdom way call him a .... for .... talking hayden.
<
 
<
<
<
who exactly are "my mob"?

Casey doesn't need love. He needs a good hiding. In the real world you just would not get away with treating people like he does and that's a fact !

Personally i don't have much of a problem with racers insulting each other, but its always going to get your back up when its your fav being insulted. My problem with casey has always been his on track antics. Not to harp on the past i will stick to this particular incident. I have no real problem with what casey said to nicky as im not a fan and i just proves the bitchy side of his personality which we have seen before. This is not unique to stoner, rossi also has this trait although more calculated. My problem was stoner then blocking nicky for the next couple of turns in a show of anger and revenge. The same as kicking riders bikes, punching them ect. Funny how some of you excuse this but in some martyrdom way call him a .... for .... talking hayden.
<

I don't have any problem with any of the other incidents including the checa one; I don't think stoner's responses as opposed to that which provoked him had any significant safety implications (which the hayden one may not have had either), and rude gestures hardly count in comparison to the serious safety issue which stoner not only clearly believes is involved but actually is involved, and concerning which he claims to have exhausted all other channels which I also believe.



I have a problem with the nicky incident as reported for 2 reasons, firstly because he apparently hazed/blocked nicky; even for a couple of corners this takes it further than a rude gesture and too far. The other issue is because it is nicky, whom as far as I know has always shown respect to stoner and as a former world champion (actually the same number of world championships as stoner as it stands) deserves the same respect as stoner clearly thinks is his due. Also as far as I am aware hayden has not been a serial offender (in stoner's terms rather than anyone else's for those who wrongly don't believe this is a significant safety issue) and in view of their past association is someone stoner could have dealt with by a quiet word in the pits, and someone towards whom even an impolite gesture would have deserved condemnation.



I have no problem at all where rossi and stoner are concerned, even if rossi had 25 world championships, mutual disrespect where from my point of view rossi has at the very least been a major contributor having been ongoing for some years, and incidents where safety has not been merely a theoretical concern having occurred in which stoner has not been the offender. Their contretemps also really annoy talpa and those like him which is a bonus
<
.
 
<
<
<
who exactly are "my mob"?

Casey doesn't need love. He needs a good hiding. In the real world you just would not get away with treating people like he does and that's a fact !

Personally i don't have much of a problem with racers insulting each other, but its always going to get your back up when its your fav being insulted. My problem with casey has always been his on track antics. Not to harp on the past i will stick to this particular incident. I have no real problem with what casey said to nicky as im not a fan and i just proves the bitchy side of his personality which we have seen before. This is not unique to stoner, rossi also has this trait although more calculated. My problem was stoner then blocking nicky for the next couple of turns in a show of anger and revenge. The same as kicking riders bikes, punching them ect. Funny how some of you excuse this but in some martyrdom way call him a .... for .... talking hayden.
<



Don't ever confuse MGP with the real world.
 

Recent Discussions