<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (BarryMachine @ Oct 5 2009, 06:27 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Well Spies will have to find the "brick Wall" that most WSBK riders find when they come to MGP.
Baylis is the only one who has actually one ( number intended for reality check
) a GP isn't he?
Spies is coming second in WSBK as we speak, to Nori. Most other riders who have come have done so after pretty convincing Ch'ship wins in WSBK.
I see Spies as an "Appease the Masses" move, driven by Dorna to tap into a huge market ( the US ) that isn't getting any "feel good" from their current riders.
But hey I could be wrong. Lets wait and see.
Personally I think Edwards is better than him. Which kinda brings me to another point, why is Edwards so neglected by his countrymen? The guy is often the next guy pushing the "Fab Four" and has at times toppled them. Sure he hasn't won a GP but he's been close. That said I can't ever seeing him winning one on pure performance, but he may be there and cash in when the others make mistakes.
It seems Spies is to be the man to allow the USer's to let go of Hayden. But frankly I think Spies presence may spur Hayden on. Hayden is the faster of the three but ...... he lacks the ability to be consistently fast in races. To me its a drive thing with Hayden he needs a "cause" to fight for to help him perform.
Eg. Hayden ..... Rossi's teams spare rider ....... that wrankles ..... out he comes on a Honda ( new team ) and proves a point.
So maybe. Spies comes in as the new "token USer" ........ maybe this may wrankle Hayden again. Unfortunately he's not in the position to do much about now as he's on a farm tractor
Spies will be touted as the next big thing from the US, and from WSBK, but I think we need to see how he reacts to his new setting ( MGP ) for a few rounds before we can even get an idea of how he is going.
So next season:
Rank of USers:
Edwards
Hayden ?
Spies. ?
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (BarryMachine @ Oct 5 2009, 07:24 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>See! not one mention of Edwards!!
What is it with the poor guy!!??
He's probably the best SBK rider the US has produced ( and I would argue that in his WSBK days it was a faaaarrrr more competitive environ than Spies is currently experiencing ) ........ and nobody even mentions him!!
There's something about WSBK that doesn't develop great MGP riders ...... perhaps Spies should have come straight from AMA?
I usually give your posts more leeway than most members here. You've got this one wrong though and I'm going to respond to each part. Sorry for any confusion and what is certainly going to be a lengthy post.
Bayliss is not the only World Superbiker to win a MotoGP race, Chris Vermeulen has as well. I thought you were an Aussie, Barry. Shame on you.
You're right that in general, riders moving up from WSBK have a pretty solid resume consisting of a championship or a history of challenging for the title. For me, Toseland isn't a comparison. Toseland spent seven years in the premier class accumulating 16 wins and two titles. Tremendous achievements, no doubt. But his rookie season was promising at best, hopeful at worst. The closest comparison I can make is Vermeulen. He took a fourth and second in his two impressive seasons but even he had a year or two of WSS to acclimate himself to the circuits. I've never seen a rider so quick to adapt to circuits and tackle a world championship the way Spies has. Absolutely it's in Yamaha's best interest to appease the US market, but they already have two of the most marketable riders in the world in Rossi and Lorenzo and a favorite amongst informed American fans in Edwards. It makes business sense, but not enough to be a driving force in the decision.
I won't speak for the rest of the Yanks but for me, I watched Hayden grow up. I was at his first AMA Superbike victory at Road America, I watched him become the youngest ever AMA Superbike champion, to MotoGP Rookie of the Year, I was at his first Grand Prix victory at Laguna and I was there to see him become MotoGP World Champion in Valencia. It's not that I don't like Edwards, because I really do. To the point that I hated Troy Bayliss in 2002, that's not easy to do. Edwards is a very talented rider and has the best personality in the paddock and he's busted his ... to get where he is. Edwards jumped to Europe after only one season of AMA Superbike if I remember correctly, probably a big reason why his American fan base is smaller than Hayden's or Spies's.
The 2001/02 seasons in hindsight appear to be far superior in talent than now but if you look at it closely there isn't much of a difference. Sure, Bayliss and Edwards are legends and I don't think Haga (lack of championships) or Spies (lack of time in the series) qualify in that category. However, the other main protagonists in those seasons were as follows: Ruben Xaus, managed to be runner up to Neil Hodgson in the 2003 Michelin/Ducati Cup and make a brief appearance in MotoGP where he produced a single podium. Neil Hodgson, won the 2003 Michelin/Ducati Cup and has won one AMA Superbike race since. Ben Bostrom, after taking six wins in 2001 has only managed two AMA Superbike victories since. Troy Corser, won the title again in 2005 on a strong Suzuki, although did beat Vermeulen. Chili, Laconi, Haga and Toseland were all essentially also rans for various reasons. When you look back at those two years, the talent was not nearly as deep as everyone, myself included, remembers.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (clarkjw @ Oct 5 2009, 07:26 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>So talent wise:
Nicky
Ben
Colin
Results predictions:
Ben
Colin
Nicky
After thinking about your talent opinions I'm not sure what I think anymore. Spies impressed me more in AMA than Hayden did. Hayden won on the RC51 when twins were at their peak, Mladin's 750 wasn't quite up to it. Spies beat Mladin straight up. He did it in two seasons compared to Hayden's three and he did it three times on the trot. But you did mention Spies being very intelligent and you're right about that. He has a knack for problem solving. I won't compare him to Rossi but it's a very important trait for top-tier riders and it's something Spies has. I'm not sure Hayden has it. Spies works through issues in the span of an hour session. Hayden works through issues in three-day tests.
In my opinion, Hayden's throttle control is unmatched. No one could slide the 990s as efficiently as him, not even Rossi. Maybe he does have the pure talent but lacks the intellect. It's difficult to say. But I do agree with your results predictions. Spies will impress next season. I just hope Hayden can get back to being up near or in front of Edwards and where I think Spies will be.