<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (J4rn0 @ Mar 25 2008, 09:51 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Hmmm... Ok I offer my 5 cents here, but do not quote me on this
Stoner enters the corner on the front brakes, then he shifts the pressure on the rear brake as he leans... Meanwhile he caresses the clutch to keep the engine revving higher than what the gear he's in would allow. This allows the power to increase, while the excess torque is absorbed by the engaged rear brake. By doing so the rear end is 'charged' with a reserve of torque which loads like a compressing spring.
As soon as he begins pulling the bike up, he opens the throttle, releasing the rear brake. The compressed torque explodes and makes the frame 'squirm' in that typical way. Somehow he can manage to ride the tide, and he exits the corner faster than others. Amen!
Easier said than done on those monsters... This is why he is among my favourite riders of all times...
Note that I never mentioned Traction Control. I am not one of those who believe that Stoner wins because of some superior TC... I think he found the perfect bike for his style anyway, because what he does is likely to use more fuel and the Ducati has the best intake pressure of all MotoGP bikes and is the most thermically optimized engine of the lot. On a Honda, he would probably run short of fuel, like (I'm guessing) Hayden at Phillip Island 2007...
Consider this:
If stoner are so much faster in the corner why are melandri faster on the straight on Quatar?
On a side note, we've seen Rossi and Stoner fithting it out in a long curve and Rossi were at least as fast as in 90% of the turn, only when the bike are almost straight up the Ducati take off.
You don't mention TC, fair enough, but how do you make that existing TC fit into a handeling as described? Wouldn't that totally mess up the TC
"The compressed torque explodes and makes the frame 'squirm' " I don't belive for a second that exploding torque on a +200bhp bike result in anything like a 'squirm'. Massive high side on the other hand...
Consider that even a production 1000cc today produce so much power that it takes some serious throttle control not to spin out the rear to a full blown high side when you go fast. To control the amount of power from a GP bike with the rear brake, clutch and throttle while you have to negotiate slids, bumps, head shake, wobble... is something a computer might be able to do in the not so far future but a human... sorry I don't by that.