Right and you of course are taking it out of context. The meaning was perfectly clear. No journo was saying it was a terrible bike; merely that it had issues that didn't jibe with the way MM rode. You and Jum in your Beavis and Butthead, rolling your eyes style constantly sniggered, exaggerating what was said by the press. It was obvious that you didn't believe it was "a .... bike" but you went to great lengths to ridicule everyone with a theory as to why it wasn't working as well for MM this year as it had in previous seasons. You constantly went to great lengths to promote the idea that the bike was perfect and that MM and Pedrosa were completely at fault. You knew perfectly well what was implied. To claim otherwise would make you an ......
Oh... and soccer sucks worse than golf.
Arrabi, what happened? I didn't watch because San Marino, really?
Oh... and soccer sucks worse than golf.
Given. Other than that?
Well the international matches are on, but as an Englishman I can confirm that a large proportion of us don't actually watch the national team out of principle. They are actually DIRE despite their supposed value/quality as demonstrated by the majority of himegrown players within the Premier League. Alot of people are watching the rugby this weekend but that don't float me boat, so its gonna have to be the F1 sleds for me...
haha, don't watch on mere principle. Classic.
Thanks for the update Arrabi. Will catch the highlights.
Being half Welsh, half Irish and raised as an Englishman I can tell you that there is great enthusiasm for next summer amongst the Celts - while in my opinion, the apathy or ambivalence of England fans is a product of a gross lack of expectation following too many false dawns and years of disappointment. My conflict of nationality does I guess give me a triple wager in the upcoming Rugby World Cup and likely next summer's Euro's and a 50/50 annual stake in the Six Nations tournament.
The English FA are truly a joke.
How could I take it out of context?
You typed what I quoted on it's on separate line. There was no before and after sentences that it was sandwiched around.
The meaning was quite clear.
Being taken out of context would be if I said to you:
".... you Kesh, you're a sack of ..... Just kidding buddy!" and you took the first sentence as the real meaning, even though I took pains to follow it up with the second sentence.
Not being taken out of context would be if I said:
".... you Kesh, you're a sack of ....," and then I segued into something else. You would then have every right to take it as a serious statement.
So essentially what you did was make the statement you did, then you segued into something else.
It wasn't taken out of context because there was no other context given to it.
You didn't help by simply avoiding what you said and deflecting into other topics, none of which were what was being discussed.
The correct terminology is football. The NFL is a misnomer.
Let it go already. You knew what I meant. Don't drag it out. You're beating a dead horse and embarrassing yourself in the bargain. I mean it. I'm heading down to Jersey to punch your mom in the .....
No - actually - I've never really been a big fan of organized sports, other than basketball. But of the others I've watched Futbol and Cricket are the most boring to watch.
TOPIC SHIFT
Change of subject, as this thread has gone .... all thanks to the forum Sanctimonious One, what do you guys entertain yourselves with when there are no GPs? I know I will get deserved flack from some here, but I've got into soccer. This particular weekend however there are no English Premier League games (the only top flight league worth watching). So im fiddling my thumbs. So what are u guys in to? (Kesh, truce for now, feel free to chime in buddy).
No it doesn't.
What are you, one of these NFL diehards?
Soccer does nothing for me. I used to be big into Rugby. But seeing the game played as it is now is a joke. As my brother, an ex Wales jnr player said: In what other sport is it considered a good move to kick the ball out of play? Rugby league is where it's at for me now.
My wife is a diehard fan of her NFL team and I watch the games with her, I've gotten a much bigger appreciation for the technical side of the game since doing so.
As much as I take the piss, I do enjoy the tactical side of NFL. I was raised watching rugby union so watching r/b's Marcus Allen, John Riggins and later Walter Payton plough through the defences in superbowl's XVII, XVIII and XX was always going to get me hooked. I then appreciated the complexity of the playbooks and from a defensive perspective, the strategies to counter these plays. We've always had comprehensive coverage of the NFL over here since the '80s and I guess through watching the Redskins in particular every week I was privileged to see the brilliant Darrell Green at his peak.
22, I've never been able to get my head around Rugby League - crude northern corruption of the original game. 'In what other sport is it considered a good move to kick the ball out of play?' - You're only saying that because they can't comprehend a line out or come to think about it, organise a scrum. I'm largely joking, I respect the vision, of our league counterparts, the speed, the passing and handling and the bravery to take a ball into contact at full speed. It's always been a game that I can't identify with though and largely leaves me cold...or being originally raised a southerner, 'out in the cold'.
I did enjoy this though...
"For all the reverberating, unintentionally self-parodying hyperbole, rugby league remains, as ever it will, the blustering short man of sport. Beyond our eastern cities and one in New Zealand, some grimy towns in England's north and a few rustic French villages, rugby league does not exist. This code is a loud provincial oaf let loose upon the big city - obnoxious, flatulent and prone to publicly displaying its genitals".
No Cookies | dailytelegraph.com.au
Be interested to hear Mike's views on the relative merits of Union and League.
Its fascinating that Kesh is absolutely unaware of his forum persona. I dont think he filters anything he says, he does not realize that every negative thing he accuse people of he is the personification of it. What is ample evident for everyone to see is that all the awful mean spirited immature unoriginal smug self-appointed authoritarian bullying comments that he tries to nanny are often employed by him. Worse, because those he accuses of negativity employ humor in a lighthearted way unlike Kesh who I think is incapable of satire. He is the angry old man, lashing out at people, accusing we have ruined this space.