Joined Apr 2015
6K Posts | 5K+
NJ
Lotus, they did redesign the CBR600RR, it's now the RCV2015.
No ....?
Lotus, they did redesign the CBR600RR, it's now the RCV2015.
Oh I haven't missed that point Mick, and am entirely in agreement. But then they are ........ with more money than sense....
Eagerly awaiting some shampoo to be massively overpriced when it's launched in an exclusive limited edition colour...
I'm sure JohnnyKnockdown would love to this that.The way things are going today, I wouldn't be surprised to see the Bostrom Bros test riding it on an episode of "Naked Speed"
What, drinking troll tears like when they sold the RCV1000RR as 0.3s a lap off the Factory bike?
Again Lex you are missing the point. I've n doubt to to average person who is going to buy it, it will 'fly' But not enough to justify the price tag.
My brother's 125 'flies', but you put Casey Stoner on it and he'd find it as slow as a slug.
It was my first thought too. A bone stock Yamaha R6 makes more HP.I'm going to go out on a limb here and say the 100bhp number was a mistake. It's probably 200bhp and like 220-30bhp with the race kit.
Lost in all the hoopla, however, was the fact that the US version is significantly detuned compared to the European and Australian versions. While the European/Australian RC213V-S models will reportedly put out 159 PS (metric horsepower, or approximately 156 horsepower) in standard trim—an optional “sports kit” that includes a new ECU, different front ram-air ducting, a different exhaust (dumping the catalytic converters and mufflers for full race baffles), quickshifter, data logger, etc., boosts power to “over 215PS” (approximately 212 horsepower), but also renders the bike “for closed course only”—the US model will only put out 101 horsepower according to the US spec page (engine rpm is reportedly limited to 9400 rpm on the US model in order to pass noise emissions standards). It is also stated on the spec page that “the Sports Kit is not available for sale in the USA.”
"I was going to fill in for Dani. I was approached, I was considered, and then unfortunately they decided against it. It would have been a lot of fun to ride a new track that I haven’t been on with Austin."
Thanks HRC, you just ...... millions of GP fans. JPLotus, you recently asked about the greatest blunder in the history of motorcycle grand prix; well this has got to be in the top 5. Another thought that came to mind when reading Stoner's quote was that he must have plenty of confidence he wouldn't have embarrassed himself. Big balls to volunteer to ride in such an event, especially considering that his teammates at the venue was the on side favorite to win on the same bike Casey would have ridden.
How can u be so smart here, then ruin it by being so dumb sometime?I can't help feeling that it was MM himself who didn't want Stoner.
HRC management of course had to ask him first if it was all right or not.
"I was going to fill in for Dani. I was approached, I was considered, and then unfortunately they decided against it. It would have been a lot of fun to ride a new track that I haven’t been on with Austin."
Thanks HRC, you just ...... millions of GP fans. JPLotus, you recently asked about the greatest blunder in the history of motorcycle grand prix; well this has got to be in the top 5. Another thought that came to mind when reading Stoner's quote was that he must have plenty of confidence he wouldn't have embarrassed himself. Big balls to volunteer to ride in such an event, especially considering that his teammates at the venue was the on side favorite to win on the same bike Casey would have ridden.
How can u be so smart here, then ruin it by being so dumb sometime?
The MotoGP spec of this bike costs $1M. No Brembo carbon brakes on the road-version, and it makes less horsepower because amateurs can't afford the maintenance bills for a MotoGP bike.
I'm going to go out on a limb here and say the 100bhp number was a mistake. It's probably 200bhp and like 220-30bhp with the race kit.