The forces not with Ducati.
No matter how much that fairing looks like a stormtrooper helmet, the forces will never be with Ducati
The forces not with Ducati.
The honda is far from sorted this year as well putting the non-contending ducati in contention.
They got this by the scrutineers by saying they're not wings. They're groin ventilators.
No matter how much that fairing looks like a stormtrooper helmet, the forces will never be with Ducati
They got this by the scrutineers by saying they're not wings. They're groin ventilators.
The words 'not in the spirit of the rules ' come to mind.
No such thing. Spirit of the ....... rules...
Write the book correctly and there's no need to worry. Just ensure you know the difference between a comma and a semi-colon.
Then the book wasn't written correctly, they're still winglets enclosed or not.
Errr. What?
Then the book wasn't written correctly, they're still winglets enclosed or not.
Properly speaking they are shrouds.
Someone has got to be talking Rossi tire conspiracy, no? The old fart is a crotch hair from pole. So much for crappy '17 Yamahas. Which if you look at the season so far is a silly concept. The Yamahas are doing pretty damn good when it isn't raining, and even that might not be all the bike's fault.Marquez can probably expect the infamous Michelin email after mentioning having a .... front tyre in the post qualifying interview.
Well I think the rules were written okay. BUT, the safety sheriff has the last word and I believe Ducati did submitted this form before. I sort of remember it. Since the main concern was safety, it looks like they are allowing it in the "spirit of the ....... rules." Read the following. I don't think the Ducati things should be allowed by how I read the wording. What do you think?No such thing. Spirit of the ....... rules...
Write the book correctly and there's no need to worry. Just ensure you know the difference between a comma and a semi-colon.
2.4.4.7
1. The windscreen edge and the edges of all other exposed parts of the streamlining must be rounded.
2. The maximum width of bodywork must not exceed 600 mm.
8. Devices or shapes protruding from the fairing or bodywork and not integrated in the body streamlining (eg. wings, ns, bulges, etc.) that may provide an aerodynamic effect (eg. providing downforce, disrupting aerodynamic wake, etc.) are not allowed.
The Technical Director will be the sole judge of whether a device or fairing design falls into the above de nition.
Moving aerodynamic devices are prohibited.
Someone has got to be talking Rossi tire conspiracy, no? The old fart is a crotch hair from pole. So much for crappy '17 Yamahas. Which if you look at the season so far is a silly concept. The Yamahas are doing pretty damn good when it isn't raining, and even that might not be all the bike's fault.
Well I think the rules were written okay. BUT, the safety sheriff has the last word and I believe Ducati did submitted this form before. I sort of remember it. Since the main concern was safety, it looks like they are allowing it in the "spirit of the ....... rules." Read the following. I don't think the Ducati things should be allowed by how I read the wording. What do you think?