This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Michael Scott: An Oasis in a Sea of Sh*t

OK - then you've made it clear. Your petty ........ is too important to put aside and you're willing to start another flame war and .... up the forum again. Go for it. But you'll have to do it on your own.

You have ...... the forum for years, take a step back and look at how busy you have been rubbishing good threads and even those meant to be parodies of lighthearted humor just since Qatar. Count the number of .... reactions you have posted in the last three months! Its fascinating how un-self-aware you are Kesh. I'll have to do it on my own? Are you going on another one of your 3 minute "hiatuses" again, pretending to take a step back to reflect on your behavior and relentless attacks on this forum only to re-emerge re-energized to go on another attacking spree?

Remember when you asked if anybody wanted you to stop flame wars that you would honor their request? Then someone spoke up and you promptly ignored them, moved the goal post and continued your disruptions to the flow of the threads. Barbwirebiker just recently pleaded for the same, calling you out by name, brave actually, as it seems there are many here unwilling to call you out specifically. You silenced Barbs immediately. Shut up Kancer. Take a step back and try to summon some decency.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
How - I would love to know, can you say that with such authority? If Arrib said so I would be more inclined to believe it without question.

“How - I would love to know…" are you listening to yourself? Thrice now you've brought up Arrabi to serve as some clairvoyant. Your demands for some proof beyond a doubt is impossible because you are insane. Mike and Arrabi already corrected you, not that you’ve given them any credence as you insist for increasing proof, a picture, no a picture with a newspaper, no a picture with a newspaper standing next to the pope, no a picture…, as you continue to conjure up wild paranoia. This post would be amusing if it wasn’t so disturbing. Arrabi, if you read this post, can you forward me the lotto numbers, thanks in advance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
He's not even in his own head.

Besides puzzling what makes this guy such an ....... is not a bad way to kill time between races.

And in so doing, you kill threads and the forum. I should note, you have blamed others for ruining this space, particularly Mdub and Jknock, neither of which have been posting much whilst you have relentlessly trolled and infested every thread with your ongoing flame war. This is an illustration that it has been you, and always you to engage in forum disruption. I supposed it wouldn't be so bad if you were clever, but its schoolyard replies out of you from the stupid .... I survey as I scroll to get to substantive posts. Again, the threads are here for anybody's inspect. If you are part of the problem, please ebb and you will see one unmistakable truth that it is Kancer and his sidekick Little Watclone that are the culprits. You have been a member for a long time Kesh, yet as the forum Kancer have led the charge to clog and choke every thread with persistent spam, as you openly admit to doing above.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
It is clear that you're the one still sooking and sulking about Rog, a man who hasn't posted on here for years but still keeps being brought up by you and Kancer. I replied to you the last time you came up with this theory Barry, as it is clear your association with Kancer is approval of his cowardly history on the subject. I've reflected on why you think synn is rog, and I've concluded that its because he makes you feel the same, that being inadequate. You were never roger's match, and in similar fashion you're chasing every post to try and make yourself feel better than synn. The only thing you've succeeded in doing is making yourself look more foolish.

Your immediate "theory" the minute anybody appears who doesn't agree with you is to imagine it must be an old boogyman come back to torment you. You’ve accused Synn of being several people now, particularly Roger. Your lack of self-awareness has, in my personal experience, been quite the staple. Speaking of incoherent rage on repeat, this ground had already been covered in the first race thread of the season, which you destroyed as usual, by jumping at the opportunity to use synn as cover for yet another attack on Roger. You’re the worst no-.... Sherlockancer and sidekick Little Watclone, trying to unlock the mystery of why Synn, Albert Tatlock, and anybody can readily know tidbits about your life. Perhaps it is too obvious to you, hiding in plain sight, readily available all the threads that you have engaged in a plethora of flame wars and all the information it contains. As Albert Matlock said, it wasn’t that difficult to find info on you, all he had to do is Google keywords: Keshav, ......., flame war.





Nice of you to put it in bold, you got my attention, which is obviously what you wanted; I had been skipping over most of your aimless, disjointed, incessant reactionary blathering nonsense. Not surprised that you are bewildered why posters might treat me “deferential” to you, the forum Kancer. I won’t speak for Arrabi, though this is twice now you’ve brought up his name, even after he told you KayDee that Synn is not Yama San, another one of your spectacular failures of self-control. You haven’t stopped to reflect, as if you possessed that capacity, to ponder why you have received in return the measure of your attacks upon new and old members. You have an peculiar tendency of thinking yourself the forum nanny, patrolling the threads for any new member that needs to be pummeled into submission, and when they don’t acquiesce, your method is to reply to every single post, you’ve managed to run off people this way. Since before the Qatar thread you’ve been particularly relentless trolling and responding, and I must note here, to my disappointment, many have joined in, some of whom I’d say is out of their character. To these others, I can relate too, I’ve been caught up myself, though I would ask them (particularly my friend MikeM) to take a step back, as Barbedwirebiker tried to plea, before he was attacked and silenced by you Kancer and Barry. Not to mention Daniboy who pointed out the same double standard, then was also attacked by the same two culprits, you Kancer and Barry, no exactly a coincidence when this keeps repeating itself.




Your brainstorming aloud trying to formulate a coherent thought is both fascinating and disturbing. Maybe Roger was RockGod and Yama san and Synn, and… all along; I’ve concluded that you suffer from some permanent effects of hallucinogenic drugs, I’m not kidding, which in a way I pity you. Your use of Synn as cover for a repeating loop of attacks on Rog is reminiscent of some flashback like some Groundhog’s Day obsession in your damaged brain.

This is why there was not point in trying to normalize interactions with you on the forum Kesh, as I’m sure you thought you were attempting with the standard thorny olive branch you extent once I expose you for a disturbing person. Your attempts at civility is exactly like your “pledge” to stop rubbishing threads, which once it roundly mocked for disingenuous, you tried to save face by saying you were just trolling. First try to exercise self-control in your replies before you start making pledges you have no intention of honoring.

^ That oughta burn curryfart’s bumhole more than chicken vindaloo...

Why do you sound so scared of him, curryfart? Don’t you have a machete to wave around?

Though I’d like to point out by only two individuals, Kancer and Barry. Despite several respected members trying to modulate their wild ideations, these two have clung like mules onto the plot devised by their mulish mind: Synn must be the ‘same guy’ years before with the audacity to pushed back after we attacked him. Yeah, that’s insane. They can’t possibly imagine Synn as one of a long list of member that have been attacked by Kancer from the onset and has returned the treatment, albeit in spades and quite successfully made Kancer and Barry look foolish. Yet Kancer struggles to make the connection as to why there is some “differential” treatment? We may be on polar opposites of the debate RC6, but that hasn’t stopped me from attempting to engage you, as well as others who have presented their view logically. Sure, its difficult to keep from insulting each other as we navigate the argument, and who doesn’t like a nicely placed dig or two, its part of the fun; but as you see with those you have engaged like MikeM and JP, they make robust reasoning’s for their positions, which I believe you can respect.

You have ...... the forum for years, take a step back and look at how busy you have been rubbishing good threads and even those meant to be parodies of lighthearted humor just since Qatar. Count the number of .... reactions you have posted in the last three months! Its fascinating how un-self-aware you are Kesh. I'll have to do it on my own? Are you going on another one of your 3 minute "hiatuses" again, pretending to take a step back to reflect on your behavior and relentless attacks on this forum only to re-emerge re-energized to go on another attacking spree?

Remember when you asked if anybody wanted you to stop flame wars that you would honor their request? Then someone spoke up and you promptly ignored them, moved the goal post and continued your disruptions to the flow of the threads. Barbwirebiker just recently pleaded for the same, calling you out by name, brave actually, as it seems there are many here unwilling to call you out specifically. You silenced Barbs immediately. Shut up Kancer. Take a step back and try to summon some decency.

“How - I would love to know…" are you listening to yourself? Thrice now you've brought up Arrabi to serve as some clairvoyant. Your demands for some proof beyond a doubt is impossible because you are insane. Mike and Arrabi already corrected you, not that you’ve given them any credence as you insist for increasing proof, a picture, no a picture with a newspaper, no a picture with a newspaper standing next to the pope, no a picture…, as you continue to conjure up wild paranoia. This post would be amusing if it wasn’t so disturbing. Arrabi, if you read this post, can you forward me the lotto numbers, thanks in advance.

I’ll take a picture next to the pope if curryfart takes one next to Ganesha.


Now who's dancing?
https://flic.kr/p/25tBoMu
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Well that's where we fundamentally disagree. You cannot look at Marquez in a vacuum considering all of the incidents that have happened in the last decade and a half of MotoGP. Marquez was penalized for something that Rossi was never penalized for in 2011. There is absolutely no consistency with the way penalties are handed out. He was only penalized 30 seconds because it was Rossi he was involved with. While it was perfectly acceptable for Rossi to torpedo Stoner, nearly torpedo him at LS08,run Gibernau off the track at Jerez, and so on. Not a single penalty was issued for any of these moves. Double standards in play by Race Direction or Dorna Direction. Hell when Iannone took Dovi out in the same corner at Argentina a couple of years ago, there was no penalty for that. We have multiple incidents of riders being torpedoed, and zero penalty being issued. The way these guys race is close and contact is inevitable, and mistakes do happen, yet none of it was penalized.

As Michael Scott said: I don’t want to come over as blindly approving of Marquez’s manic move on Rossi, when he could clearly have waited until one or two corners later with less risk. But I do believe it was a genuine mistake—locking up the front and consequently running wide onto a wet patch. And he was punished: by 30-seconds, which dropped him from fifth and out of the points.

Genuine mistakes happen and no other rider was so heavily penalized for it.

Spot on highlighting this quote by Scott. We should certainly scrutinize Marc, actually, we have, one can easily go back and read the criticism written of him on this forum. Coupled with the criticism should also be the acknowledgment that he had revised his approach post 2015. Marc acknowledged that he had made many mistakes that cost him the championship. His revised approach could be seen in action in 2016 and 2017, of which many recognized his more stable methodology to racing. Sure, he didn’t reach the elevated Dovi status of steadiness, as the Italian was able to out smart Marc’s aggression in spectacular last corner lunges for the win. But if Marc had subscribed to the Rossi precedent, Marquez would have been rightly (though wrongly) entitled to Gibernauing Dovi out of the way. That would have left Race Direction in the awkward position of pronouncing what Rossi did, a incident that has been celebrated as GP lore, being either punishable or unpunishable. Marc did not barge Dovi out of the way, and we should acknowledge this fact as a reflection of his revised harnessed aggression, not to do so is either disingenuous or as we seen by some “journalist” a dubious prosecution of Marc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Now who's dancing?

This is important for others to note and see what you're attempting to do here Kesh. You quoted me with substantive posts pointing out how you have been trolling relentlessly to make some disconnected point, and here again you have demonstrated it. You have no scruples left, if ever you had some. The truth is here for any of us to examine.
 
Last edited:
This is important for others to note and see what you're attempting to do here Kesh. You quoted me with substantive posts pointing out how you have been trolling relentlessly to make some disconnected point, and here again you have demonstrated it. You have no scruples left, if ever you had some. The truth is here for any of us to examine.

So important!
 
Spot on highlighting this quote by Scott. We should certainly scrutinize Marc, actually, we have, one can easily go back and read the criticism written of him on this forum. Coupled with the criticism should also be the acknowledgment that he had revised his approach post 2015. Marc acknowledged that he had made many mistakes that cost him the championship. His revised approach could be seen in action in 2016 and 2017, of which many recognized his more stable methodology to racing. Sure, he didn’t reach the elevated Dovi status of steadiness, as the Italian was able to out smart Marc’s aggression in spectacular last corner lunges for the win. But if Marc had subscribed to the Rossi precedent, Marquez would have been rightly (though wrongly) entitled to Gibernauing Dovi out of the way. That would have left Race Direction in the awkward position of pronouncing what Rossi did, a incident that has been celebrated as GP lore, being either punishable or unpunishable. Marc did not barge Dovi out of the way, and we should acknowledge this fact as a reflection of his revised harnessed aggression, not to do so is either disingenuous or as we seen by some “journalist” a dubious prosecution of Marc.

2015 was his true learning year as he realized you cannot win championships riding out of control because you will crash no matter how talented you are. I find his 2016 title to be one of the best in recent memory because it came off a year in which he was wrongly vilified by the Rossi Cult. He came back and shoved it right up their ..... by winning the world title which was the ultimate statement.

He has cleaned up his riding more than people realize. Going into 2015, remember how all we thought before every race weekend, practice session, and race who he was going to torpedo? He had a ton of close calls in the first half of that season that had you going, "He's going to injure someone".

Completely agree that it needs to be acknowledged that all of those last corner lunges on Dovi, he could have rammed him right off the track, but tried to keep it as clean as possible. The old Marquez probably would have run Dovi off the circuit. He was the same way at Qatar this year. He made the lunge but couldn't make it stick. He picks and chooses his opportunities, and being an aggressive rider, he's going to do things and go for gaps others would not. Argentina could have gone better for him, but what's fascinating is how race direction decided his primary offense was "taking Rossi out". Rather than acknowledge the corner was one of the wettest on the circuit, they refused to also acknowledge he lost the front end. It was a racing incident that was made worse because of track conditions. Yes he probably should have waited till they hit turn 1 in hindsight, but as they say hindsight is 20/20. Rossi left the door wide open and had no spatial awareness to notice a bike was near him and decided to come down when MM was a fraction ahead of him already, resulting in contact. I saw a picture that showed Marc's front wheel tucking as Rossi made contact with him.

maquez-vs-rossi-argentina-2018.jpg


You can clearly see he lost the front of the bike. Nothing malicious in the maneuver. Rossi had the option to stand his M1 back up as most other riders would have done, but refused to do so making contact unavoidable.

Was Marc aggressive that day? Certainly, but there was no malicious intent. Just ill-timed overtake attempts on Espargaro and Rossi. But as I already pointed out, where was the penalty for Petrucci who riders have openly said has a ton of incidents? Nowhere because Dorna Direction are chickenshits who pick and choose who is penalized.

Rossi's entire GP career is littered with malicious intent and no meaningful penalties. Well you could say he was penalized for Sepang which really meant nothing since he was never going to finish better than 4th regardless of grid starting place. What should have been a black flag and multi-race ban was just a back of the grid penalty. The journal corps along with a lot of fans think Marc should have been black flagged for an unintentional incident caused by a loss of front end grip. Forget that their idol in the middle of a grand prix committed the most egregious, despicable acts in history by kicking a rider off his bike and received no significant penalty for it was the height of shame.

At the end of the day it looks as if Rossi's post-race whining and screaming about Marquez may have fueled Marquez in the way that wins championships. Still too early to say as we don't know what the Ducati situation is, or even the Yamaha situation. But the way he checked out on the field in COTA and admitted to having motivation for that race is literally the worst possible thing Rossi could have done because he still doesn't understand that Marquez feeds on this stuff. It fuels him. It's his lifeblood. He now has a purpose for 2018. If he checks out on the season, everyone should thank Rossi for running his mouth once again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
This is important for others to note and see what you're attempting to do here Kesh. You quoted me with substantive posts pointing out how you have been trolling relentlessly to make some disconnected point, and here again you have demonstrated it. You have no scruples left, if ever you had some. The truth is here for any of us to examine.

Let’s not forget his racist, “mexican monkey” comment leveled at you a while back. That picture is an obvious reference to that
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
Let’s not forget his racist, “mexican monkey” comment leveled at you a while back. That picture is an obvious reference to that

Ahh... now the Sarah Sanders Huckabee of PS is back spreading more lies and distortions. I'd hang around to chat with you but I know how tirelessly you toil coming up with all this ......... Keep up the good work.
 
Last edited:
Though I’d like to point out by only two individuals, Kancer and Barry. Despite several respected members trying to modulate their wild ideations, these two have clung like mules onto the plot devised by their mulish mind: Synn must be the ‘same guy’ years before with the audacity to pushed back after we attacked him. Yeah, that’s insane. They can’t possibly imagine Synn as one of a long list of member that have been attacked by Kancer from the onset and has returned the treatment, albeit in spades and quite successfully made Kancer and Barry look foolish. Yet Kancer struggles to make the connection as to why there is some “differential” treatment? We may be on polar opposites of the debate RC6, but that hasn’t stopped me from attempting to engage you, as well as others who have presented their view logically. Sure, its difficult to keep from insulting each other as we navigate the argument, and who doesn’t like a nicely placed dig or two, its part of the fun; but as you see with those you have engaged like MikeM and JP, they make robust reasoning’s for their positions, which I believe you can respect.

Sure, I will lay off from flame wars with Synn, who is quite knowledgeable about the sport and is showing strong signs recently of having a more general interest in the sport beyond Rossi and of wishing to engage in the forum more generally.

It has been hard for me not to engage in recent weeks because remarks/behaviour from Rossi like those in the post race press conference at Argentina are precisely the reason I developed my current attitude to him, it has never been about his actual riding or not wanting to recognise what he has achieved for me.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
Yeah! Stop calling yourself "curryfart" and " kancer" when you are making a reasoned reply Kesh!

I take it back. The maturity of the place hasnt gone back 10 years when you returned jumkie, its gone back 40.

:rolleyes:
 
Yeah! Stop calling yourself "curryfart" and " kancer" when you are making a reasoned reply Kesh!

I take it back. The maturity of the place hasnt gone back 10 years when you returned jumkie, its gone back 40.

:rolleyes:

I know. :p I was going to go back and quote a bunch of the "reasoned replies" from these three - but why bother? The lies and hypocrisy they push is littered all across this forum. It's kinda hard to miss.
 
Ahh... now the Sarah Sanders Huckabee of PS is back spreading more lies and distortions. I'd hang around to chat with you but I know how tirelessly you toil coming up with all this ......... Keep up the good work.

When everything changes to the Michelin dynamic - it's going to be a Mexican monkey-..... Can't help thinking that the non-factory teams are going to be even further back in the field than this year.

Mexican Monkey: A term to describe a half black half mexican person. They are lazy and don't speak english. In other words they are the bad part or the race.

Hmmmm are there any mexicans on this forum? Segfault....can you do me a favor? See if you can spot the Mexican on the forum for me. Gracias
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
I know. :p I was going to go back and quote a bunch of the "reasoned replies" from these three - but why bother? The lies and hypocrisy they push is littered all across this forum. It's kinda hard to miss.

...and yet you bothered.
I play my tabla and you dance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Lol! Tinfoil Jesus is up to his old tricks again. Time to crank up production at the crack lab and buy more bandwith for Power Slide. He'll be pulling more all nighters typing up those 50 page diatribes.

Little Fluffer once again comes along to to suck off his boy in need.
Better be careful Lil Fluff. Gay ... can be dangerous. Wouldn’t want to see you carry on the family legacy
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
Let’s not forget his racist, “mexican monkey” comment leveled at you a while back. That picture is an obvious reference to that


This again? Really??? I dispelled this nonsense last time. Your accusation is as baseless as every other one you've leveled at those you lash out at. There is absolutely no basis in reality for your claim. Cite any proof of this absurd allegation. You can't - because you just fabricated it out of thin air like you always do.

And bye the bye, to be on the safe side, when I went to the barbershop nearby in Haverstraw - which is 99% Mexican, I went to see my guy Manny for a haircut and I asked him about this. There were 9 other chilangos in the shop and he asked them if they'd ever even heard of the expression and they all laughed. He said, whatever pinche ...... told you this is ....... yanking your chain. Exactly as I said the first time you pulled this lie out of your ....
 
Last edited:

Recent Discussions