<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (chopperman @ Aug 23 2009, 11:42 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>im going to stick my neck out here and say the duc became un ridable or more stressful to ride after capi left the team. Was it because of the lack of capis development experience or because ducati started toying with new un tryed things lie carbon frames and swingarms ??
Rog, as you would have noticed, I have stayed relatively quiet on any 'cause' of Casey's illness and also on the development front with my general comment always being that Stoner's responsibility has always been to develop a bike that he can ride well and fast (as with all riders who lead development). Should another rider be able to ride that machine that is a bonus or it is up to the rider to change their style, some do and can, some cant.
But, my theory for teh situation does follow your thought patterns (I am sure no surprise there) and yes, my suspicion is that CS has been affected by the path taken by Ducati.
The first thing that really struck me was that the issues really started surfacing for the public to see at Catalunya where it was said that both Yamaha and Ducati had upgraded electronics packages and where the Yamaha's did run away somewhat. This was the first time it was seen but made me wonder when it actually started and was there a trigger as we all know, it has been a big fast downhill slide since.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (VHMP01 @ Aug 24 2009, 03:20 AM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Oh man... why do we have to Rog?
So on with it... lack of development?
V, I don't see Rog saying lack of development, but more the direction of that development and it is a valid point (for any manufacturer) as following an incorrect path, no matter how minute coould make the end result a catastrophic failure or a wonderous success.
I actually don't see Rog's comments as a Stoner thing bu ta Ducati point (correct me by all means Rog) and it is valid and aligns to comments made by Rossi as to why he did not go to Ducati.
Garry