This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Jerez testing.

Dr No
3464541364285393

Really? I would have thought a race simulation means you've stopped ....... around with bits and are now in a position to use that knowledge to have a better understanding of tyre use and changes due to fuel load. Also pulling a dozen more laps at times that others couldn't match on their hot laps has to be good for your mental state.


When do you stop ....... around with a race bike?
 
When you start disappearing up your own arse with 'just one more change'.

Another way to look at it is that a race sim is just another way to .... around...to give you data for more ....... around. Later on.

Races aren't won in a 4 lap sprint.
 
Mental Anarchist
3464531364284790

 


I don't see the importance of race simulations.  I see it as a waste of time churning out laps when you could be coming in and translating what you feel so improvements can be made.  The only reason I would suggest it is a good idea is if the rider feels they need to do it.  Lorenzo obviously feels he need to do it because he does it even on a race weekend so good on him but if I was managing a team I would not permit it for any other reason.


 


As far as fitness goes, at 5-10million a year I would expect my rider to turn up ready to race physically, mentally and emotionally.  How they do that is up to them but they would not be doing it on my time when I have $100,000's of engineers sitting in the pits waiting to diagnose and tune the bike.


Rarely do i disagree with you, but this one i do. There are so many variables in a race, it would be hard to predict them all running 3 lap sprints. How the bike acts full of fuel, 3/4 full, 1\2 full  etc. When exactly are the tires going to fall off the performance table. When is the rider going to start hitting the wall mentally. You can use mathmatical equations to predict these happenings, but to me, thats all they would be is predictions instead of first hand knowledge. Pedrosa's MO in his career is to fade at the end of the race. Is it him physically, mentally, or could it be the bike goes away because they didnt have it set up to optimize a full race. You really cant argue with Lorenzo's methods of setting up his bike for race day, it has brought him a ton of success.
 
Do not underestimate the importance of running race simulations. I wrote a story for a Belgian magazine about Lorenzo's 2012 championship, and interviewed Wilco Zeelenberg about it. Zeelenberg pointed out the race simulations as a key ingredient, for three reasons:

1. Race fitness. All of these riders are in peak physical condition, but you only really know where your body is going to suffer after riding a MotoGP bike flat our for 27 laps by riding a MotoGP bike flat out for 27 laps. Zeelenberg singled out the arm pump that both Pedrosa and Stoner suffered at Qatar as being down to a lack of running race simulations. Lorenzo knew that would happen, because he'd already felt it during race sims in Sepang, so he changed his approach and training to reduce the effect.

2. Concentration. These riders are concentrating 100% for 45 minutes. My personal best is about 12 seconds. It is physically, mentally and emotionally draining to concentrate 100% for such a period of time, and they only way to manage is by training for it. Again, Lorenzo's physical training regime is focused on building this, but doing it on a bike is the only way to test it.

3. Understanding the limit, even after a number of laps. Rough translation of Zeelenberg's quotes (EXCLUSIVE! ZEELENBERG TELLS POWERSLIDE HOW LORENZO FINDS THE LIMIT!) "Because he can do that (ride at the limit expending less energy, because of his smooth style), he can find the limit more easily, he can feel that because he can ride seven, eight, nine laps right at the limit, he knows 'oh, have to be careful here, have to be careful there'. He does that in the race as well, but he risks falling off less. He can feel the limit earlier. He creates that feeling by being physically capable of putting in so many laps."
 
Kropotkin
3464721364304537

Do not underestimate the importance of running race simulations. I wrote a story for a Belgian magazine about Lorenzo's 2012 championship, and interviewed Wilco Zeelenberg about it. Zeelenberg pointed out the race simulations as a key ingredient, for three reasons:


1. Race fitness. All of these riders are in peak physical condition, but you only really know where your body is going to suffer after riding a MotoGP bike flat our for 27 laps by riding a MotoGP bike flat out for 27 laps. Zeelenberg singled out the arm pump that both Pedrosa and Stoner suffered at Qatar as being down to a lack of running race simulations. Lorenzo knew that would happen, because he'd already felt it during race sims in Sepang, so he changed his approach and training to reduce the effect.


2. Concentration. These riders are concentrating 100% for 45 minutes. My personal best is about 12 seconds. It is physically, mentally and emotionally draining to concentrate 100% for such a period of time, and they only way to manage is by training for it. Again, Lorenzo's physical training regime is focused on building this, but doing it on a bike is the only way to test it.


3. Understanding the limit, even after a number of laps. Rough translation of Zeelenberg's quotes (EXCLUSIVE! ZEELENBERG TELLS POWERSLIDE HOW LORENZO FINDS THE LIMIT!) "Because he can do that (ride at the limit expending less energy, because of his smooth style), he can find the limit more easily, he can feel that because he can ride seven, eight, nine laps right at the limit, he knows 'oh, have to be careful here, have to be careful there'. He does that in the race as well, but he risks falling off less. He can feel the limit earlier. He creates that feeling by being physically capable of putting in so many laps."


Nicky would be reassured and encouraged to read this.


 


Tamed dim vet.
 
Mental Anarchist
3464531364284790

 


I don't see the importance of race simulations.  I see it as a waste of time churning out laps when you could be coming in and translating what you feel so improvements can be made.  The only reason I would suggest it is a good idea is if the rider feels they need to do it.  Lorenzo obviously feels he need to do it because he does it even on a race weekend so good on him but if I was managing a team I would not permit it for any other reason.


 


As far as fitness goes, at 5-10million a year I would expect my rider to turn up ready to race physically, mentally and emotionally.  How they do that is up to them but they would not be doing it on my time when I have $100,000's of engineers sitting in the pits waiting to diagnose and tune the bike.


 


Translation: Mental still trying to defend Stoner's approach of minimal laps.


 


(This worked well enough for CS, but conventional & practical wisdom favors race simulations).
 
Looking back at Pedrosa's history in pre-season testing, I can see the logic of calling it quits early. Any day not spend testing is a day not ending in multiple fractures and a ruined first half of the season.
 
Can I rider tell without looking at the clock if he has in fact gained that extra 10th second trying to put out a hot lap?
 
 I think Stoner's approach was revolutionary and right, although atm nobody can emulate him: rather than doing long race simulations, he worked on instant adrenalin stimulation. It worked wonders. 
 
J4rn0
3465051364338759

 : rather than doing long race simulations, he worked on instant adrenalin stimulation. It worked wonders. 


wtf are you on about with stimulating stoner, it may have been one of his advantages to be able to quickly evaluate parts/set up changes ,surely because hes up to speed so fast, but i don't see how that counters the criticism that both he and dani have to take: they didn't work as hard as lorenzo and lorenzo uses that as his biggest advantage IMO
 
eltoro
3464411364260685

When Vale retires, does anyone believe it will be anyone OTHER than Cal getting his factory seat?


 


 


BS38........he deserves it


 


 


 


 


as much as his Tech3 seat.
 
Jumkie
3464831364312924

Translation: Mental still trying to defend Stoner's approach of minimal laps.

 

(This worked well enough for CS, but conventional & practical wisdom favors race simulations).
 

Stoner was most likely conditioned by riding a Ducati and spending most of his time chasing a flukey set-up. Not much point cruising around for 20 simulation laps 2 seconds off the pace, ala the GOAT, then coming in to the pits to stare down the cripple guy in the wheelchair. Sorry couldnt help throwing that stone.

 

Now Lorenzo, well the Yamaha is mostly a well sorted package that lends itself to race simulations. Throw Lorenzo on the DuCRT and I think this approach might not be quite so effective. But certainly in the case of putting mental pressure on your teammate and the opposition Lorenzo is very good and it worked well in 2012. Thats his thing really, being consistent, its his DNA as much as Stoner's is the one quick lap. They cant change what they are.
 
Dis thre d is hil rio s.

Once aga n the aussie she p have band d togethr 2 defnd Stonr. Baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

Doi g less of som thi g mak s you beter. Nice theory, im using it rite now. Im only gon a rite half the leters i used 2.

It worx. It took me 1/2 da time to rite dis post.
 
cliché guevara
3465061364339082

wtf are you on about with stimulating stoner, it may have been one of his advantages to be able to quickly evaluate parts/set up changes ,surely because hes up to speed so fast, but i don't see how that counters the criticism that both he and dani have to take: they didn't work as hard as lorenzo and lorenzo uses that as his biggest advantage IMO
I agree with CG although i would take it a step further. I think this is the dumbest post ive ever read on this site.


Edit. Not you cliche. I meAn j4nos anal stimation post
 
JohnnyKnockdown
3465131364350282

Dis thre d is hil rio s.

Once aga n the aussie she p have band d togethr 2 defnd Stonr. Baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

Doi g less of som thi g mak s you beter. Nice theory, im using it rite now. Im only gon a rite half the leters i used 2.

It worx. It took me 1/2 da time to rite dis post.


 


 u typ lik Jum. shrtr pst, tho. fkn dmb cnt.
 
JohnnyKnockdown
3465131364350282

Dis thre d is hil rio s.

Once aga n the aussie she p have band d togethr 2 defnd Stonr. Baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

Doi g less of som thi g mak s you beter. Nice theory, im using it rite now. Im only gon a rite half the leters i used 2.

It worx. It took me 1/2 da time to rite dis post.
Nice try Geonerd likes this. I may be an aussie sheep but i can still spot a yankee troll.
 
birdman
3465171364356504

Nice try Geonerd likes this. I may be an aussie sheep but i can still spot a yankee troll.


 


JK failed to spot the half the Stoner supporters weren't Australian.


 


American Geography being what it is - Hey I've been there three times and the following map is correct, they only begin to reshape the model at University level, around the time they start talking about Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny and the Church, most forget the map, the Santa Delusion is very traumatic.


 


I was looking for the updated map that replaces "commies" with Arab Terrorists but could't find it, mind, I didn't go past line 3 of Google images.  


 


Somewhere down in the purple where people cannibalise is Stonerland. 


 


4150493949_73cd1a01db_o.jpg
 
wtf are you on about with stimulating stoner, it may have been one of his advantages to be able to quickly evaluate parts/set up changes ,surely because hes up to speed so fast, but i don't see how that counters the criticism that both he and dani have to take: they didn't work as hard as lorenzo and lorenzo uses that as his biggest advantage IMOI agree with CG although i would take it a step further. I think this is the dumbest post ive ever read on this site.
Edit. Not you cliche. I meAn j4nos anal stimation post

A Powerslide first. JK agrees with Cliche. :)
 
Don't really remember Rossi doing full race simulations at Yamaha.


 


It comes down to riding style I guess. Lorenzo beats you on consistency, Stoner/Pedrosa beat you with shear pace by trying to run from the green light.


 


If running race simulations was the key, Hayden would be the GOAT.
 
cliché guevara
3465061364339082

wtf are you on about with stimulating stoner, it may have been one of his advantages to be able to quickly evaluate parts/set up changes ,surely because hes up to speed so fast, but i don't see how that counters the criticism that both he and dani have to take: they didn't work as hard as lorenzo and lorenzo uses that as his biggest advantage IMO


 


Wtf, feel free to stay with boring & meticulous Jorge "mantequilla" Lorenzo then, or with the fastest underachiever on earth, Dani Pedrobot... :)
 

Recent Discussions