<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Jumkie @ Mar 16 2010, 08:03 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>I realize if you are a diehard Rossi fan, your initial reaction is to defend him even when the praise is in this case, not particularly praise worthy. This is why the term "Bopper" exist, because in the face of giving accolade it should at least be something genuinely praiseworthy. In this case, this brief interview left nothing that a regular person would find "brilliant".
Well, until you showed up I had no desire to write in this tread what so ever. Honestly I didn't find much to write about, it's only when you start slaging Rossi (as so often before) and does so by totaly jumping the conclutions. There is no logical compromise by saying you would feel like a traitor by doing something and actually doing it or something similar. You could call it sort of a paradox but it's really just doing soemthing you don't like to do.
I could agree with you that there is nothing brilliant to write home about in the interview but on the other hand there was nothing to criticize either.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE <div class='quotemain'>Babel, I'm trying to be nice, but your reply is weak You have nothing, so you're splitting hairs.
The thread was started with the idea that this interview shows how brilliant as in gracious Rossi is, yet I showed you not only was it far from extraordiary, but rather ungracious and self serving.
Well, let's say you set an extremely high moral goal for some riders in the GP-paddock.
We are all tending to say self serving things or to have goals that might be self serving
but there was little to nothing ungracious or self serving about this interview, that's why we have the term "Hater".
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE <div class='quotemain'>As far as Loyalty Clauses, this is not imaginary, they exist in contracts because you don't want a guy you are employing to start talking .... about your company if they are dissatisfied for something as lame as giving your co-worker a new contract. If you were Yamaha (seriously, put yourself in their shoes) you would expect professionalism when trying to negotiate a new contract without employee openly talking about going with your competitor. Not only is it in loyalty clauses that you agree to when you sign (and cash your check) but also the league usually has rules against it. I know that in US professional sports, players can not talk to other teams unless given permission, not sure if Dorna has such rules though I imagine they do (besides it being rather unseemly).
I have no doubt what so ever that US players can not say what they want. In the land of the free it's an increasing and up to now accelerating decline in freedom of speech and that's just one of the symptoms.
Unfortunatly Europeans follow US in many regards and I'm sure there are similar terms in Europe but hardly to the same degree, and when it comes to motoGP it's not hard to find precedence for Rossi's critics as "everybody" does it. Makes contracts less interesting me thinks. And I'm sure Dorna have sanction possibilities against strongly disloyal riders/teams but do you really think this interview is even remotely near being punished?
As for the actual critics from Rossi the only lame thing here is you making it sound so trivial.
I agree that some here on the forum are attacking Stoner for almost everything he says but I'm not one of them. At the most I might consider some of his statements to be somewhat self serving
when the actual events speaks heavily against him. In those cases his words might not weigh as much as they usually does and I concentrate on the events rather than his statment.