<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(mylexicon @ Jul 20 2007, 09:19 PM) [snapback]80201[/snapback]<div class='quotemain'>
Spies manages 12th on a heavily modified roadbike and you're worried about people getting over excited? You can't get excited enough about such a performance.
I wasn't sure Spies had it, but if he can ride the Suzuki to within a second of Stoner, he can be competitive in MGP. Good Luck, Spies.
Great news for AMA, hopefully more Americans can fast track to Motogp thru our home series. I'm sure all WSBK and AMA riders hope MGP keeps cutting displacement "for safety" b/c MGP will cease to be the premier series if they keep that .... up.
If WSBK was smart they would allow greater engine modification and even more extra cc's for the twins, and beat Motogp at its own game.
Can you imagine the ridiculously sick roadbikes that would be available if WSBK became the world's premier roadracing series
don't assume someone who can ride a superbike well can ride a GP bike well. edwards has two world championships and we all know his GP record.
also, laptimes don't dictate what the premier class is, the quality of the machine does. superbikes are the progeny of GP machines and always will be meaning the technology going into them is what GP bikes had first. if GP laptimes were a second or two slower than SBK times, nobody would care. a GP bike is still a completely different animal than a superbike.
why the heck would you want MORE mods allowed in sbk? that completely goes against the spirit of the series. as tom says, it should be way more like superstock. since you seem to be so into AMA SBK, are you not aware of the complaints all the privateers have on this very topic ?
i think you don't really understand the relationship that GP racing has to the superbike market. the factories use the GP series to create the technology that goes into superbikes. you've got the cart before the horse.