This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Estoril 2011 Race

So this time you're sure he is not dreaming it up like the FP2 towing incident
<



Are you saying you find Casey dreamy?
 

Attachments

  • little-....-smiling_5FVFM_13156.jpg
    little-....-smiling_5FVFM_13156.jpg
    21.2 KB
The gap was very very obviously due to being balked by Simoncelli at the beginning. Watch the race again.

Nick Harris and Gavin Emmet commented numerous times that his lap times were almost identical during

the last third of the race. He was undoubted unnerved at the prospect of being taken out two races in a row

by yet another out-of-control Italian.
<
By the time he'd regained his rhythm it was too late.



Factoid: Bowling was invented by the Egyptians.



But perfected by the Italians.
<



Do you mean his laptimes were identical to that of Pedrosa's in the last 3rd?

If yes, then you're WRONG
<
... He lost 3.385 seconds to Pedrosa in the last 3rd of the race (which is more than what he lost in first 3rd). So Nick Harris and Gavin Emmet are wrong if they said his lap time was almost identical to that of Pedro in last 3rd
 
Great race by Pedrosa! and JL.



Stoner showing the usual Estoril curse.



Rossi doing a good Melandri impersonation.



Dovi ........??? what was up with Dovi!!???
 
The gap was very very obviously due to being balked by Simoncelli at the beginning. Watch the race again.

Nick Harris and Gavin Emmet commented numerous times that his lap times were almost identical during

the last third of the race.
He was undoubted unnerved at the prospect of being taken out two races in a row

by yet another out-of-control Italian.
<
By the time he'd regained his rhythm it was too late.



Factoid: Bowling was invented by the Egyptians.



But perfected by the Italians.
<

Thats simply not the case, if you look at the last 9 laps of the race, Pedrosa and Lorenzo were much quicker. The announcers also said when describing the battle up front that they were doing "well over 200 mph" when in fact, neither rider broke 200 mph the entire race. Announcers love to embellish, the numbers dont lie.
 
Thats simply not the case, if you look at the last 9 laps of the race, Pedrosa and Lorenzo were much quicker. The announcers also said when describing the battle up front that they were doing "well over 200 mph" when in fact, neither rider broke 200 mph the entire race. Announcers love to embellish, the numbers dont lie.



Pedrosa was in a league of his own.
 
I need to get a new hobby. Motorcycle Grand Prix is no more. Endurance car racing rules are not appropriate for a motorcycle sprint series.
 
Since neither of us were there on the track in-person, I'm going to go with the opinion of the guy who was.



Your are right, cameras are there on track but they could be too objective. Better to go with 'opinions'...
smile.gif




Or, if you have the MotoGP.Com account go have a look at the video:





1. This is Stoner's wobble; not nice, but he does not lose any ground.











2. Here is Sic's crash: Stoner's line is not disrupted. In the video you hear him closing the throttle one split second, then he opens up again and he clears away.

























You are saying this was the reason Stoner arrived 3rd instead of 1st -- I say it may have costed him a few tenths, not more. Certainly the 8 seconds were not originated here.



Ah, Kesh, Kesh... it's not my fault if you are mostly wrong... but feel free to blame the Italians, we don't care!
biggrin.gif
 
He'd been complaining (quietly to journos) that he'd been having front end issues all weekend.

Spies is pressure-proof. If the crew can get the bike working properly he'll be back to form.

Which is why there is a small, but growing, number of people wondering if Houseworth is up for it. No disrespect to the guy, but he was wrenching in the AMA four years ago. This is an entirely different animal. And it just seems as though Spies has plateaued, maybe even dropped off this season. He looks uncharacteristically uncomfortable, as if he's overriding that bike. And there's plenty more speed in that bike, which Lorenzo has proven time and again. Which leads us back to the crew.
 
You are saying this was the reason Stoner arrived 3rd instead of 1st -- I say it may have costed him a few tenths, not more. Certainly the 8 seconds were not originated here.



Yes, it didn't cost him 1st as he was slower than Pedrosa. But he definitely lost more than a "few tenths". I'd say he lost around 1 second there.
 
Not a bad race, but not as exciting as i expected.



Lorenzo was doing a Rossi, late braking and keeping the same smal gap every lap, But fortunatly Pedrosa found a way to pass finally.

I,m affraid Simonchelli has still a few high sides to fly before finding the rythem.

Rossi didn't have a great race, but better 4th than crashing, this was the first time i saw Rossi made all his overtakings in the start. He couldn't ride away from Dovi even, but still good enough to keep him behind.

Stoner had also his own problems, but he made the most of his chance. i saw he was touching his own back side again, i dont know if it was meant for an imaginary tow sercher again or that he was talking to his team.

Spies, had a disaster race, he and Hayden had a contact, the same as Lorenzo had with Simonch in Valencia 2010. Maybe they should run to the media and ..... about it.





Edit:



I just remember Rossi finished 5th and behind Dovi at the last second.
 
Respect to Pedrosa- briliant race. I really strat to like the guy.

Lorenzo looses concentration once he gets overtaken. No wonder he wants time attacks rather then races



We should have two threads after every race, one dedicated for the Rossi haters. This will save some time filtering the crap.
 
Spies, had a disaster race, he and Hayden had a contact, the same as Lorenzo had with Simonch in Valencia 2010. Maybe they should run to the media and ..... about it.

If they qualified on the front row or finished on the podium, they could.
 
The gap was very very obviously due to being balked by Simoncelli at the beginning. Watch the race again.

Nick Harris and Gavin Emmet commented numerous times that his lap times were almost identical during

the last third of the race. He was undoubted unnerved at the prospect of being taken out two races in a row

by yet another out-of-control Italian.
<
By the time he'd regained his rhythm it was too late.



Factoid: Bowling was invented by the Egyptians.



But perfected by the Italians.
<
Looks like your two boys were wrong again, it's crazy that a guy with so much 'racing experience' like yourself would believe the media hacks before the time sheets. You only hear what you want to hear and parrot it around like fact. Wrong again.
 
Yes, it didn't cost him 1st as he was slower than Pedrosa. But he definitely lost more than a "few tenths". I'd say he lost around 1 second there.



Looking at the video, especially the shot from above, and checking his position vis vis the riders in front of him before and after Sic crashed, I'd say he lost almost nothing. One second is a lot, it becomes immediately visible. Which wasn't the case.

Anyway the point is that his race wasn't decided there.
<
 
Did Stoner have a dig at Simoncelli post-race? If he did, it sounds like he's piggybacking Lorenzo's little movement and trying to distract people from the fact that his team mate was much quicker than him when he started going flat out.