<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Duc999 @ May 20 2008, 04:11 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Lex
Please elaborate. I for one thought that it was very odd that Rossi got the switch to bridgestones after all of the whinning and postuering on all sides of the tyre situation.
It was widely reported that Rossi was seen in plain sight attending meetings with Dorna officials during the technical tire meeting sessions. Whether or not it was THE MEETINGS is inconclusive.
As many know. The tire hullabaloo was at it's peak at Estoril. After Bridgestone and Michelin failed to reach an agreement (basically over who was going to get stuck trying to please Rossi) Ezy issued a blanket threat. At the Malaysian GP DORNA would decide whether or not to award a control tire.
Between Estoril and Malaysia there were many reports of shady dealings and alliances etc. Probably mostly hear-say but there were things happening regardless of how far off the rumors were.
Anyway. Michelin was going to leave if they couldn't unload Rossi's development budget. Rossi had his own family of tires and according to Edwards no one else could ride them even though Edwards was frequently expected to be his test mule. Bridgestone refused to supply him b/c they knew how Rossi/Yamaha expected preferential treatment.
Long and short, B-stone realized Ezy wasn't playing around about the control tire and they welcomed Rossi on board. Obviously, there were very substantial operating agreements revolving around his trade that never made it into the rule books. Bridgestone turned Yamaha down during numerous negotiations only to welcome Rossi with open arms after staring down the barrel of a control tire.
Considering the magnitude of the tire crisis and the schism it caused in the press/fanbase, I can't foresee, imagine, or even make-up situation whereby Ezy allowed both manufacturers to continue status quo operations.