- Joined
- Oct 16, 2006
- Messages
- 24,726
- Location
- Your Mom's House
PART II (You can skip the first section if you already read it and go straight to the rider analysis)
What is the explanation for the back markers?
I made a list of our back markers (excluding Hayden & Melandri).
Disclaimer: Obviously Hayden & Melandri have under achieved. Keep in mind, under-achieving indicates that they are better than the results they’ve had so far. A person who is not that great and has bad result is NOT under-achieving, but rather meeting poor expectations. I excluded Hayden & Melandri from the list below because, well hell they get full dedicated threads about their woes, so I thought lets talk about the rest of the crew.
So excluding Hayden & Melandri, why have the following boys performed so badly (or have they)?
Current Points Standings and Rider/Team
16th DePuniet (LCR Honda satellite)
17th Guintoli (Ducati Alice satellite)
18th West (Kawasaki factory)
If we are to believe that the riders in MotoGP are the top riders in the world (for the sake of this thread, just accept it), then why is half the lower part of the grid dramatically out of contention after the first lap? Some of these riders come close to a minute plus past the finish line after the race winner, why? Are there special explanations or circumstances that 8-10 of the 18-rider grid is effectively an after thought in each and every race? (You can add your own question).
What is the explanation? Are they really under achieving? What is your verdict?
My answer: (It’s a long comprehensive one, but if you got the time, and you like to discuss MotoGP, then you might be willing to read the whole thing). We regularly bash the riders that end up as back markers in the race as riders that suck or haven't lived up to expectations. So what is the real story, or is there one?
DePuniet has about the same 250 results to show as Elias, nothing outstanding but fair (I guess). Does this merit a seat in MotoGP? Well if Elias is here then why not DePuniet, right? He has racked up a total of one ever podium in this class, but that is about it, no poles, not even a fastest race lap. If Elias is the style favorite champ, then DePuniet would clearly win the spectacular crashes award (if there was such a prize). Its interesting that LCR Honda must have a thing for crashers, after-all this is the seat vacated by Stoner in 06 only to have Randy--a proven and seasoned crasher sign on after being released by team green. It’s rather obvious what is the problem for DePuniet—crashes & crashes! I'm not gonna look it up, but I know at some point he had 7 DNFs last year, and I think he's the leader of DNF crashes this year (if somebody wants to look it up, great). But when hes not crashing, hes consistently finishing 9th (three this year). Again, he is on a Honda, normally this would mean the rider sucks as Honda is usually a good machine, but since the advent of 800s, I can't really blame the rider of a satellite; considering that the factory had sub par results last year (and seems intent on focusing all their attention on one particular 98 pound rider dear to Alberto Pig). (bias alert). Having said that, Dovi is perhaps the standard to judge satellite Hondas, and knowing that this is not DePuniet's rookie season, I'm gonna go out on a limb and blame him for sub par results. Verdict: He is definitely under achieving, you first have to finish to achieve, and he is not doing that.
Guintoli is perhaps one of two riders (West being the other) that one could (should) ask; 'has merit taken a back seat (no pun intended) regarding how & why they earned a place in MotoGP?' If you look to his record of results in 250s you will find a stark absence of wins, or 2nds for that matter. Yup, the man has never had a win or even a second, all he racked up was one ever podium, a third as a 250 rider. So how did he get to have a seat in MotoGP? Are we to believe that riders get into the pinnacle of motorcycle racing by falling between the cracks? (Another discussion thread for sure.) I'd be hard pressed to make a case why Guintoli deserves a ride in MotoGP (considering that there are only 18 spots in a sea of talent in all the major series around the world). But to his credit, he amassed that lone podium in 250s as a more classically defined privateer. (So I'll let you be the judge of whether he merited a ride in MotoGP). But while here, he did challenge for a podium last year on Dunlops. Now, he is on a Ducati. Perhaps the asterisk next to Guintoli should read: 'he hasn't accomplished much, but his non-podiums & non-accomplisments have been done on Dunlops and now on a Ducati.' Guintoli was rookie of the year on a Dunlop shod bike, so obviously we can look past results and ascertain rider ability despite poor package (or can we?) Guintoli has not been as impressive as his teammate, but by a very small margin. Guintoli has not cracked the top 10; his best was an 11th place finish, other than that it’s been a steady diet of 13-17th! So if Elias is the standard to judge Guintoli, then a similar verdict must prevail. The real question may be, is he a token Frenchman, and does he really deserve to be in the premier class? I'll let you decide, but as for the topic at hand... Verdict: I don't expect much from his riding, he is achieving along poor expectations on a rather ...... bike.
West may also be filed under 'how did this guy get a MotoGP seat?’ But to his credit, he has one more 250 victory than Guintoli. That is--one victory, ever. Perhaps we can look further back, all the way to his Australian national titles as a youngster. I didn't check, but then again maybe Guintoli won some kind of a title (none of us have heard about) in France. Unfortunately for us, we don't have that one member around here anymore to give us the full Monty of merit for West. But to his credit, he did win a few races in WSBK last year, which was impressive enough (it seems) to have caught the eye of a factory effort in MotoGP (that is, if we can call Kawasaki a factory effort). Nonetheless, West is here save the enigma. We can bash Melandri because we know he is a capable race winner, but West got his job by impressing in a few rounds in WSBK and backed it up with a few impressive showings (relatively speaking) last year in MotoGP. He did lead a race last year, but he was penalized for a mistake on the start grid. Lets turn attention to this year. I can't really say he has impressed (after-all he is last in points, well actually Okada is ‘last’ from that one-off race were he got 2 points) but West has a full single digit 8 more points than him. I can't really say its all Westy's fault considering that I have much respect for Hopkins, who has scored only 22 point more than West at the moment. After-all, West did beat one-person last race. His best showing has been a 13th, the rest have been 15-19th, no .... (that's bad even for those who remember KR’s last year free fall status). Teammates are usually the standard to judge the co-rider, but sometime there are special circumstance to consider (i.e. Peders--98 pound robot)/ Hayden--a normal sized human being); in the case of the Kawasaki team, Hopkins is a much better talent than West, so it may be unfair to compare the two. The one glaring similarity of course is their machine. Considering that it is a "full factory effort", and West is being beat by the likes of Guintoli on a satellite Ducati (who if you remember has ‘one’ less 250 win than Westy), then my verdict must come from comparing these two riders. Verdict: I don't expect much from West, so he is not underachieving (that is to say he is doing as expected) and he's doing it on a relatively crap bike.
Yes, I did have too much time on my hands. So please take a moment to comment on what you think about the topic and the riders mentioned.
What is the explanation for the back markers?
I made a list of our back markers (excluding Hayden & Melandri).
Disclaimer: Obviously Hayden & Melandri have under achieved. Keep in mind, under-achieving indicates that they are better than the results they’ve had so far. A person who is not that great and has bad result is NOT under-achieving, but rather meeting poor expectations. I excluded Hayden & Melandri from the list below because, well hell they get full dedicated threads about their woes, so I thought lets talk about the rest of the crew.
So excluding Hayden & Melandri, why have the following boys performed so badly (or have they)?
Current Points Standings and Rider/Team
16th DePuniet (LCR Honda satellite)
17th Guintoli (Ducati Alice satellite)
18th West (Kawasaki factory)
If we are to believe that the riders in MotoGP are the top riders in the world (for the sake of this thread, just accept it), then why is half the lower part of the grid dramatically out of contention after the first lap? Some of these riders come close to a minute plus past the finish line after the race winner, why? Are there special explanations or circumstances that 8-10 of the 18-rider grid is effectively an after thought in each and every race? (You can add your own question).
What is the explanation? Are they really under achieving? What is your verdict?
My answer: (It’s a long comprehensive one, but if you got the time, and you like to discuss MotoGP, then you might be willing to read the whole thing). We regularly bash the riders that end up as back markers in the race as riders that suck or haven't lived up to expectations. So what is the real story, or is there one?
DePuniet has about the same 250 results to show as Elias, nothing outstanding but fair (I guess). Does this merit a seat in MotoGP? Well if Elias is here then why not DePuniet, right? He has racked up a total of one ever podium in this class, but that is about it, no poles, not even a fastest race lap. If Elias is the style favorite champ, then DePuniet would clearly win the spectacular crashes award (if there was such a prize). Its interesting that LCR Honda must have a thing for crashers, after-all this is the seat vacated by Stoner in 06 only to have Randy--a proven and seasoned crasher sign on after being released by team green. It’s rather obvious what is the problem for DePuniet—crashes & crashes! I'm not gonna look it up, but I know at some point he had 7 DNFs last year, and I think he's the leader of DNF crashes this year (if somebody wants to look it up, great). But when hes not crashing, hes consistently finishing 9th (three this year). Again, he is on a Honda, normally this would mean the rider sucks as Honda is usually a good machine, but since the advent of 800s, I can't really blame the rider of a satellite; considering that the factory had sub par results last year (and seems intent on focusing all their attention on one particular 98 pound rider dear to Alberto Pig). (bias alert). Having said that, Dovi is perhaps the standard to judge satellite Hondas, and knowing that this is not DePuniet's rookie season, I'm gonna go out on a limb and blame him for sub par results. Verdict: He is definitely under achieving, you first have to finish to achieve, and he is not doing that.
Guintoli is perhaps one of two riders (West being the other) that one could (should) ask; 'has merit taken a back seat (no pun intended) regarding how & why they earned a place in MotoGP?' If you look to his record of results in 250s you will find a stark absence of wins, or 2nds for that matter. Yup, the man has never had a win or even a second, all he racked up was one ever podium, a third as a 250 rider. So how did he get to have a seat in MotoGP? Are we to believe that riders get into the pinnacle of motorcycle racing by falling between the cracks? (Another discussion thread for sure.) I'd be hard pressed to make a case why Guintoli deserves a ride in MotoGP (considering that there are only 18 spots in a sea of talent in all the major series around the world). But to his credit, he amassed that lone podium in 250s as a more classically defined privateer. (So I'll let you be the judge of whether he merited a ride in MotoGP). But while here, he did challenge for a podium last year on Dunlops. Now, he is on a Ducati. Perhaps the asterisk next to Guintoli should read: 'he hasn't accomplished much, but his non-podiums & non-accomplisments have been done on Dunlops and now on a Ducati.' Guintoli was rookie of the year on a Dunlop shod bike, so obviously we can look past results and ascertain rider ability despite poor package (or can we?) Guintoli has not been as impressive as his teammate, but by a very small margin. Guintoli has not cracked the top 10; his best was an 11th place finish, other than that it’s been a steady diet of 13-17th! So if Elias is the standard to judge Guintoli, then a similar verdict must prevail. The real question may be, is he a token Frenchman, and does he really deserve to be in the premier class? I'll let you decide, but as for the topic at hand... Verdict: I don't expect much from his riding, he is achieving along poor expectations on a rather ...... bike.
West may also be filed under 'how did this guy get a MotoGP seat?’ But to his credit, he has one more 250 victory than Guintoli. That is--one victory, ever. Perhaps we can look further back, all the way to his Australian national titles as a youngster. I didn't check, but then again maybe Guintoli won some kind of a title (none of us have heard about) in France. Unfortunately for us, we don't have that one member around here anymore to give us the full Monty of merit for West. But to his credit, he did win a few races in WSBK last year, which was impressive enough (it seems) to have caught the eye of a factory effort in MotoGP (that is, if we can call Kawasaki a factory effort). Nonetheless, West is here save the enigma. We can bash Melandri because we know he is a capable race winner, but West got his job by impressing in a few rounds in WSBK and backed it up with a few impressive showings (relatively speaking) last year in MotoGP. He did lead a race last year, but he was penalized for a mistake on the start grid. Lets turn attention to this year. I can't really say he has impressed (after-all he is last in points, well actually Okada is ‘last’ from that one-off race were he got 2 points) but West has a full single digit 8 more points than him. I can't really say its all Westy's fault considering that I have much respect for Hopkins, who has scored only 22 point more than West at the moment. After-all, West did beat one-person last race. His best showing has been a 13th, the rest have been 15-19th, no .... (that's bad even for those who remember KR’s last year free fall status). Teammates are usually the standard to judge the co-rider, but sometime there are special circumstance to consider (i.e. Peders--98 pound robot)/ Hayden--a normal sized human being); in the case of the Kawasaki team, Hopkins is a much better talent than West, so it may be unfair to compare the two. The one glaring similarity of course is their machine. Considering that it is a "full factory effort", and West is being beat by the likes of Guintoli on a satellite Ducati (who if you remember has ‘one’ less 250 win than Westy), then my verdict must come from comparing these two riders. Verdict: I don't expect much from West, so he is not underachieving (that is to say he is doing as expected) and he's doing it on a relatively crap bike.
Yes, I did have too much time on my hands. So please take a moment to comment on what you think about the topic and the riders mentioned.