Joined Sep 2016
894 Posts | 557+
Queensland Australia
Your logic is flawed. Since Rossi started at the back of the grid, his laptimes would've been affected by all the slower riders he was stuck behind and having to safely overtake (Valencia can be difficult for overtaking). By the time he made his way up to 4th position, he would've suffered from tire degradation. His laptimes do not prove that he would not have been faster if he had a decent starting position and was with the front runners.
Tyre degradation plays a part, as it did for all of the riders on the grid. Rossi was hovering behind the front 3 in most of the practice sessions that weekend and qualified in 12th (due to coming off I think)???
I dont see why you think during the race he would have been lapping faster than other others if he had started further up the grid... his lap-times during that weekend dont support your theory that he had better pace than Lornezo and could have won.
I dont know why so many of Rossi's fans feel he was so hard done by, his (very deliberate) altercation that caused Marc to crash at Sepang netted him 3rd along with the 16 points when he should have resulted in a black flagged or at minimum a ride through penalty. He got off lightly.
Marc served a 30 second penalty for colliding with Rossi at Argentina, a racing incident by comparison compared to deliberately forcing someone wide and off the line. If Rossi received the same 30 second penalty at Sepang it would have been championship over???
The only crying i remember from after the Argentina race was from Uccio when Marc tried to apologise for making a mistake.