Ok haven't posted in ages but I always read the forum. This which I have copied and pasted is from jinx on motomatters, very interesting info about the brake ducts.
Yamaha 01 - Valentino's setup from Sunday. They have enlarged the upper "over the axle" duct but it remains a poor design. Intake ducts have a few simple rules: The inlet should be in clean airflow, the Yamaha upper has a lot of its inlet opening in the boundary layer attached to the fender/forks. By placing the inlet above the axle, for the airflow to reach it it must first negotiate a spinning tire, and the tire's relative velocity to the airflow is greater, and more disrupted, above the axle than below it. Next, all inlet ducts should be diffusers, that is they get larger in cross section as the flow moves towards the brake caliper. By making the duct divergent, we are slowing the incoming airflow, and so converting that reduced air velocity into higher pressure. And it is the higher pressure that you want, not the greater velocity. Inlet ducts also do not like sharp changes in direction or cross sectional area. In fact, they hate it, and the Iwata upper duct has both negatives in spades. For .... sakes, Yamaha makes musical instruments. If someone designed a tuba this bad they would be fired on the spot. The good news? Rossi was also running a small under the axle inlet duct that is an absolute peach of a design. Properly located in the airflow, smoothly expanding cross section, no ackward changes in direction, and feeds a mini-plenum to maximize pressure at the cooling interface. As small as it is, I would make a serious wager that it flows 80% of what the big one does.
Yamaha 02 - Fabio's setup from yesterday. Everything as stated in Yamaha 01 but lacking the smaller under-axle duct.
Suzuki 01 - An absolutely marvelous bit of design work. Everything positive said about Vales nice little lower duct but even more so. The highly efficient design allows for a smaller inlet than most of the others. My personal favorite.
Ducati 01 -The benchmark with no discernible flaws. Solid under-axle design ending in a substantial plenum. Nice.
KTM 01 - What impresses me (and others) about KTM is the elegant design and rock-solid engineering of almost every single component on this motorcycle. Someone spent the time required on this duct, and to tip my hat to KTM management, that meant they were allowed to spend that time. A design without flaws, but could be further optimized by using Suzukis expanding duct profile.
KTM 02 - But this shows where KTM has taken a step ahead. This is far and away the best integration of the duct inlet with the other components. The basic location ensures it is in a stable high-velocity airstream, and the careful shaping of the fender and the lower fork leg also means that this area produces a higher inlet pressure.
One small niggle: Motorcycle engineers, please stop looking at supersonic military aircraft inlet ducts. Those are designed for higher Mach values and have to deal with compressible flow and shock waves. To do so they have sharp inlets. You do not have a high-performance military aircraft, you have a vehicle traveling below Mach 0.3 at sea level. Your inlets need to be radiused. Look at the forward edge (lip skin) of any modern turbofan for commercial aircraft.