<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (stop_killing_dead_things @ Jun 6 2007, 04:12 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>1. no i dont like lorenzo, thats no secret, but i dont see what that has to do with pasini?
2. pasini may have said sorry but we just didnt find out. if he didnt then yes, i agree, that was out of order and he should have done. and dani had no choice but to say sorry anyway, he would have been killed by nicky, honda and the press if he didnt.
3. thats exactly the point, smith COULD have done well, just like pasini COULD have done well if his bike didnt keep breaking down. you cant say 'could' or 'what if' in motogp, it doesnt work that way - what happens happens.
4. i repeat, he is not an ...... none of the riders are idiots. and what do you mean he cant accept his bike is failing? the bike doesnt fail, it just had a mechanical... several times. the crash with bradley had nothing to do with his bike, it was his fault that he messed up his braking.
5. when have you seen pasini have a tantrum? sure he gets pissed off when his bike stops, what racer doesnt?! but he doesnt throw a tantrum, take the last time his bike stopped again (i think it was france) he just went back to the pits and hugged his mechanics, yeah such a tantrum
. if you want to see what a tantrum looks like, take a look at our mutual friend - or not as it would seem.
now dont take this as a dig at you, its not, i just dont think your argument has any proof to back it up thats all.
1. I don't like Pasini and you don't like Lorenzo, so it's fair for me to call Pasini an '.....' if you want to call Lorenzo a 'big head'.
2. Pasini did NOT say sorry to Bradley.
3. You can say that because I did. If you can't, then why do people say 'could Rossi take the lead in the championship off of Stoner?'
4. Some of the riders are idiots. That would be Pasini.
5. And yes he does throw a tantrum. I saw him do it.. on the tv.. broadcasted..