This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

VR Effect: Negative Repercussion for GP

Of course you don't care about the truth, you're the type of person who is the typical Jim Jones follower, no amount of truth or reason will stop you from drinking the Culo aid.

Conspiracy? Haha you're the one who believes there was a conspiracy by Marquez to steal Rossi's title. And it's good that you bring up Casey Stoner, the contrast will always highlight what a failure the artificial GLOAT is when not on the best machinery. Just another midpack rider. Forever when Stoner's name is invoked it will invoke the contrast of Rossi’s doctored career.

Oh ......... The Ducati was already on the way down every year that Casey rode it after the first. Casey's style suited that bike, VR's didn't. How many times does this needs to be discussed already? Judging a near 20 year career of multiple wins, championships, across different classes and only pointing to the 2 worst years while ignoring the other 15 successful ones makes you an ignorant tool.
 
Oh ......... The Ducati was already on the way down every year that Casey rode it after the first. Casey's style suited that bike, VR's didn't. How many times does this needs to be discussed already? Judging a near 20 year career of multiple wins, championships, across different classes and only pointing to the 2 worst years while ignoring the other 15 successful ones makes you an ignorant tool.

Fair point.
Let me ask you: Did Rossi's results on the Ducati impress you? Did you think he was going to improve on Casey's efforts? Did his first session on the thing come as a surprise?
 
Oh ......... The Ducati was already on the way down every year that Casey rode it after the first. Casey's style suited that bike, VR's didn't. How many times does this needs to be discussed already? Judging a near 20 year career of multiple wins, championships, across different classes and only pointing to the 2 worst years while ignoring the other 15 successful ones makes you an ignorant tool.
Did suit Rossi’s "style"? As in Rossi can win .... unless he's on the best everything? I only talk about the premiere class, plenty of great lower category riders that never got the special treatment in GP. Makes a big difference, not that you'd notice. Casey was Ducati's fourth choice. Did u know Rossi had a clause in his contract that he could veto who his teammate would be? Why would a competitor want that? Perhaps to guarantee he'd never be challenged? Imagine that, not only did the guy demand the best everything, exclusively, but also who he lined up against on the same bike. No wonder he left Yamaha in a fit when Lorenzo beat him. Rossi is a farce dude, just like you. Thank God for Carmelo clause. Easily bamboozling the weak minded masses.

Hey look, I can go from last to 4th, wow. You wanna talk EQUAL machinery? Well process this genius, tof the four best bikes your boy came LAST!
 
Last edited:
Fair point.
Let me ask you: Did Rossi's results on the Ducati impress you? Did you think he was going to improve on Casey's efforts? Did his first session on the thing come as a surprise?

No of course it didn't impress me. He struggled for sure. As a VR fan, obviously I thought he would improve or at least equal it. I can't remember his first session. I'm not that fanatical to remember what I thought of his first session. Is the point of your post to imply that Casey was a superior rider because he won on that bike and VR didn't? Maybe he was maybe he wasn't buy I'm not going to be totally ignorant and ignore 19 years of almost nothing but winning because of a couple of bad seasons on questionable machinery.
 
I don't give a .... what you say, your 300,000 posts don't intimidated me. You are basically implying the only reason for his success is your conspiracy nonsense of special equipment for him and him only. This makes you totally clueless and biased, you can no longer think objectively. It is difficult to see this when Casey's balls are forever in your mouth.

Rossi won most of his titles when there were no real competition.
If Crutchlow was riding in that era, he'd probably won 2 titles.

On the other hand, Lorenzo beat the best to win his 3 motogp titles,
Against Stoner,Rossi and Marquez
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
Did suit Rossi’s "style"? As in Rossi can win .... unless he's on the best everything? I only talk about the premiere class, plenty of great lower category riders that never got the special treatment in GP. Makes a big difference, not that you'd notice. Casey was Ducati's fourth choice. Did u know Rossi had a clause in his contract that he could veto who his teammate would be? Why would a competitor want that? Perhaps to guarantee he'd never be challenged? Imagine that, not only did the guy demand the best everything, exclusively, but also who he lined up against on the same bike. No wonder he left Yamaha in a fit when Lorenzo beat him. Rossi is a farce dude, just like you. Thank God for Carmelo clause. Easily bamboozling the weak minded masses.

Hey look, I can go from last to 4th, wow. You wanna talk EQUAL machinery? Well process this genius, tof the four best bikes your boy came LAST!

I've said it before I'll say it again, there is no having a discussion with you, your blinding hate for VR has consumed you well beyond the point of being objective or impartial. Who else can take anything positive and spin it into something negative. Hear this, when he retires it's the results that will count, not your paranoia and conspiracy theories of special tires and rocket fuel. This may come as a nasty shock to you but results count hearsay doesn't. He is going down as the GOAT for now like it or not. JL already said so on the record. Try and not let this affect your brain cells too much.
 
Rossi won most of his titles when there were no real competition.
If Crutchlow was riding in that era, he'd probably won 2 titles.

On the other hand, Lorenzo beat the best to win his 3 motogp titles,
Against Stoner,Rossi and Marquez

So this is somehow his fault? Critchlow wasn't, whether he wins or not is total speculation because he's a crasher. I happen to think the competition wasn't totally zero. Although I agree it's been cut throat the past 6-7 years I'm not going to say the others were a complete cake walk either.
 
I've said it before I'll say it again, there is no having a discussion with you, your blinding hate for VR has consumed you well beyond the point of being objective or impartial. Who else can take anything positive and spin it into something negative. Hear this, when he retires it's the results that will count, not your paranoia and conspiracy theories of special tires and rocket fuel. This may come as a nasty shock to you but results count hearsay doesn't. He is going down as the GOAT for now like it or not. JL already said so on the record. Try and not let this affect your brain cells too much.

I enjoy how you get so flustered with the truth. Must hurt so much that your defense mechanism kicks in. No no, you just hate my leader, I can't listen to you, Rossi good, you bad man, bad man. Hahaha classic cult follower. Hey, maybe SNS didn't exist eh? Maybe it was just Ducati not "suiting his style". Oh dear, Marquez stole my title, it was mine.

I love how every single thing that boppers like you were bamboozled to admire about Rossi has been utterly debunked:

He's a hard racer, oops not really, bitched of race.
He is a safe rider, oops he just deliberately crashed a rider out.
He's the best when on equal machinery, oops not really he's the last of the best bikes.
He's the best development rider ever, oops suck ... at Duc.
He never whines, oops epic meltdown.
He never cracks under pressure, except when he cracks under pressure.
He can mind .... everyone, oops backfire mind .....
He is graceful in defeat, oops thee GOAT of SORE LOSERS!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
So this is somehow his fault? Critchlow wasn't, whether he wins or not is total speculation because he's a crasher. I happen to think the competition wasn't totally zero. Although I agree it's been cut throat the past 6-7 years I'm not going to say the others were a complete cake walk either.


well, when it wasn't, rossi did everything he could to bring it there, you know, mind games, off track excursions, "jokes", post race celebrations, etc.
 
Oh ......... The Ducati was already on the way down every year that Casey rode it after the first. Casey's style suited that bike, VR's didn't. How many times does this needs to be discussed already? Judging a near 20 year career of multiple wins, championships, across different classes and only pointing to the 2 worst years while ignoring the other 15 successful ones makes you an ignorant tool.

Actually, it makes one wonder why somebody would throw away a reputation built on a 20 year career of multiples wins, etc. , just to maybe win one last one that he would maybe get just by not crashing. Were all the vr fans saying that Nick deserved his title in 2006?
 
No of course it didn't impress me. He struggled for sure. As a VR fan, obviously I thought he would improve or at least equal it. I can't remember his first session. I'm not that fanatical to remember what I thought of his first session. Is the point of your post to imply that Casey was a superior rider because he won on that bike and VR didn't? Maybe he was maybe he wasn't buy I'm not going to be totally ignorant and ignore 19 years of almost nothing but winning because of a couple of bad seasons on questionable machinery.


So you just started to watch motogp over the last 7 years & red rossi book to figure out the 19 years. Ask Tony Elías about those great SNS tires rossi used to rack up his first set of titles in the premier class. Talk about tainted & hollow success!!!

YES, Casey is by far a better rider than rossi will ever be. Marc & Jorge is also better rider than rossi.
 
I'm not going to be totally ignorant and ignore 19 years of almost nothing but winning because of a couple of bad seasons on questionable machinery.

During the period that I have been following this sport, I have seen some great talents come and go, wasted, primarily because - (forget a couple of bad seasons) - they spent an entire career on 'questionable machinery'.

The move to Ducati was a huge miscalculation based largely upon conceit and arrogance. It is the first and only time that we have seen Valentino Rossi on truly uncompetitive machinery although the M1 in 2004 was certainly inferior to the factory RCVs. You make the point that the bike had been deteriorating for years, but even given this decline Casey Stoner was still capable of winning races on it and although the consistency needed for a title was out of the question, I'm fairly confident in saying he would have continued to do so. Rossi could not, even in spite of the appreciable concessions conferred upon him throughout his two years as a Ducati rider which other riders had not benefited from.

I have huge respect for Rossi's has achievements this season, to maintain such focus and passion for racing the age of 36 is indeed admirable. However, even the most fervent aficionado must question where he would be on a package lacking such bespoke attention and preferential treatment - and if you are blind to that then I urge you just once to remove the yellow tinted spectacles. I would also question where he would have found himself given the 2015 RCV.

We have had this discussion innumerable times. The best riders justifiably inherit the best bikes - and although they would not fare so well on customer or satellite packages, I am confident that overall and given time their 'non-alien' counterparts would not be able to exploit the factory machinery to the same extent. Of course, a nine year tenure on a Factory Honda without delivering a title is unprecedented, but in terms of Vale's career, the fact that he became the prodigal son of Yamaha, says as much about his marketing potential as it does his talent.

Contrary to your contention, his years at Ducati are in fact the most significant and telling...which is why he 'sorry Mike t.shirt' aside, he will never come close to the true 'greatest of all time'. In fact this entire GOAT nonsense is yet another false canard foisted by the yellow faithful. 2011 - 2012 confirmed the suspicions of the few truly objective pundits, peers, plaudits and paddock personnel immune to yellow fever.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 9 people
Perfect storm of events? Really? I saw 4 very deserved wins and a few podiums with less than 2-3 seconds separating him from the leader. I saw a great drive from last on the grid to 4th at the last race. I still see a rider who despite his age has huge balls in wet conditions more than your top 3 riders will ever have. He may not match them in outright speed but on occasion there will be victories. Seriously though, comparing him to riders who are on equal or on better bikes that are 10-12 years younger and suggesting he will be 4th? GTFO genius

All true, and the championship would have been well deserved if he had won, the wet races were wet for all riders, and if Valentino was better in those races then that was the way it was.

However the conditions were the same for all riders in the last 3 races as well, and if Jorge was faster than Valentino in those races (along with MM in 2 and possibly 3 if his race had continued, and Dani in 2 of them as well as Iannone in 1) then that is the way it was as well. The suggestion that riders other than Jorge should not be allowed to race Valentino when he had achieved his lead with all those riders racing Jorge as hard as they could is perhaps the most ridiculous thing I have heard in my several decades of following the sport.

This remarkable season at age 36 was all to VR's credit, whether he won the championship or finished a close second, until the Sepang pre-race press conference. I totally agree he was in no need of any extra credit anyway, btw, which is why it was all so crazy.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
At least they didn't go UFC on eachother, eh? So maybe there is hope for an end to all this negatively.

My money would be on Marc...

Oh ......... The Ducati was already on the way down every year that Casey rode it after the first. Casey's style suited that bike, VR's didn't. How many times does this needs to be discussed already? Judging a near 20 year career of multiple wins, championships, across different classes and only pointing to the 2 worst years while ignoring the other 15 successful ones makes you an ignorant tool.

Can't be called the GOAT if he couldn't at least do as well on the 2011 Ducati as Stoner did on the 2010 bike imo. The 1994 Williams didn't suit Senna's style..but he put it on pole in every race he drove it in, and lapped his team mate in Brazil in a car that gave him arm cramp...
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
I enjoy racing, thoroughly enjoyed this season as it was very exciting. I can't think of anything missing from the 2015 season. I'm sure there will be good racing without Rossi after he's gone. In fact it could be said that Rossi is riding for the paycheck and .... blocking more deserving riders at the chance of a competitive ride. Once Retired, the yellow hoarde will die out and the racers that remain can race on without walking on yellow egg shells.
Greatest Of All Time, I'm not convinced, in fact I think GOAT is used too often now. The greatest rider is the one you root for, the one you would get up at 05:00 to watch even if just for a glimpse at the back of the pack.
MotoGP will go on without Rossi, Marquez, Lorenzo, Pedrosa, and we will still be here to talk, fight, ....., and moan about it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
Can you make a post in this thread that doesn't mention Casey's sack? You seem obsessed with them.
Is it just CS's sack you are fascinated with, or could you spice things up with say, mention of Pedrosa's cojones?

How 'bout huffing Jorge's huevos?
 
Last edited:
the racers that remain can race on without walking on yellow egg shells.
.

"Walking on yellow egg shells". Haha. Though I'd say, he did get a bit of egg on his face. Hysterical stuff bro.

I'm afraid next year will be remembered for the Booing GP Tour of 2016. I dont see Marc & Jlo getting much love. As much as Pedro hurt my feelings for tag teaming with Al Puig against Nicky, I never booed the man. And Pedro has been on every step of the podium at all the US rounds I've ever attended, errrr. You get on the podium, you don't get booed, it's the decent thing to do.
 
Last edited:

Recent Discussions