Joined Jul 2015
812 Posts | 336+
Hurricane, WV
We actually speculated about this, and had considered Dorna insufficiently stupid to bring in such a rule. Their capacity for making unworkable rules should not be underestimated I guess.
I always enjoyed Mick Doohan telling everyone to .... off post-race (perhaps he didn't tell Mat Oxley to do so often enough), even Stoner's stream of consciousness, etc.
You expressed your enthusiaam for punting riders off (well, Rossi). What changed?This continues to show the lack of feasibility of running a sport with one player getting preferential treatment as much as possible.
I've said in the past that anyone who is a fan of grand prix motorcycle racing first and foremost should be praying for Rossi to exit the sport at the end of 2016.
10 penalty points before a DQ is ludicrous as you know.
Dangerous riding has officially been given a green light with the combination of this, and the 3 points only for punting a rider off a bike during a race.
You expressed your enthusiaam for punting riders off (well, Rossi). What changed?
Again, Dorna insists on operating in the gray. Why can't they simply have black and white rules. They want to leave everything to interpretation and that does nothing but open themselves up to scrutiny. Still to this moment, Marquez has done nothing illegal, has done nothing to bring the sport into disrepute yet they insist on including him and Lorenzo as reasons for new rules.
Partially in answer to JPS's preceding post, it is a little harder to figure this one, and whilst not an admirer of Dorna and their methods I can't see this rule as one designed for Rossi's benefit, given that MM and Lorenzo have shown a willingness to let go in regard to last year's end of season events go while Rossi has been the one continuing the war in interviews this year.
I don't think Dorna can make a workable rule for this in black, white , gray or any color.
Who does Dorna think brought the sport into disrepute . Was it Roosi for his accusations and actions, was it Lorenzo for saying the punishment was weak because it was Rossi,
It was Dorna who I said couldn't do it. You actually know very much more than Carmelo or Dorna do about bike racing.Maybe Dorna can't but I guarantee you I could. Leaving everything up to the interpretation panel opens up a never ending stream of possibilities for riders to exploit. They say they will punish you for bringing the sport into disrepute. Great, what is the ....... punishment. Will the punishment depend on who it is, what time of the year it is, how the championship standings will be affected, how the TV ratings will be affected. The fans need clarification and Dorna seems to be going out of its way to keep things as murky as they can. At this point, we as fans still cannot take any of thes new rules and say this is what the penalty would have been had these rules been in affect last year. Who does Dorna think brought the sport into disrepute . Was it Roosi for his accusations and actions, was it Lorenzo for saying the punishment was weak because it was Rossi, was it Marquez for doing nothing wrong. They need to come out and say what the infractions were and what the penalties will be in the future. That's black and white.
Yeah, only that's not gonna happen. If you check the FIM website, you will see that no such press release has been issued. In fact, the GPC hasn't met yet, and they would have to change the penalty system.
Motorsport.com copied a story off AS.com, from a Spanish reporter whose name I have never previously come across.
So I was totally wrong. Interesting that the Spanish fella managed to get a hold of a FIM press release two days before it was published.
This is what I have a problem with
The Panel of Stewards will be known as the FIM MotoGP Stewards Panel and they will be responsible for deciding on penalties that are not considered to be matters of fact.
In other words, it doesn't matter if there is factual proof, if in our opinion Marquez was intending to hold up Rossi at PI and Sepang, or purposely didn't try to beat Lorenzo at Valencia, we now have the power to arbitrarily punish riders just because we can
Race Direction always had that power. There is no change there. By "matter of fact" they mean stuff like passing under yellow flags. Everything else is the irresponsible riding clause, and that is always a matter of interpretation.
Nice article by Krop on rules changes. Unlike Oxley, he relieves Lorenzo from the fray, but is still quite harsh on Marquez who still to this day has done nothing wrong but race Rossi hard but fair. In fact, Marquez has been the bigger man than anyone involved in the incident. What has he done to be called a petulant child. His criticism of Dorna is to the point and warranted, they have created a clusterfuck of epic proportions.
https://m.motomatters.com/opinion/2016/03/04/editor_s_opinion_more_knee_jerk_rule_cha.html