<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (phleg @ Feb 26 2008, 04:49 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Stoner doesn't help his whining reputation by doing this.
When he does well, it's all down to him.
When he doesn't win, it's down to the bike.
And
why do I think this story is a molehill being transformed into a mountain?
why is just what I'm thinking? honestly a molehill? phleg man you gotta be kiddin me. Ducati have the super high revving, all conquering desmocedici. Honda, in an effort to reach the same revvy heights and the elusive extra peak power that lives there, have designed an engine with pneumatic valve operation but it don't work. In fact, it's such a piece of crap that their factory riders have rejected it and are going to use last years, low revving, sprung valve, dog slow engine for the forseable future. But wait, Honda come out with the suggestion to have regulations changed to introduce a rev limit, a reg change that can only possibly disadvantage one factory, Ducati. I know have spelt out the painfully obvious here but tell me you still don't get it, or even worse that you think it's fair? Ducati must be seething, and rightly so. A rev limit? In motoGP? Get the .... outta here!