- Joined
- Aug 27, 2007
- Messages
- 11,378
- Location
- Pomona NY
ok ok Satellite Ducati RIP 2012
Weren't Crutchy on a satellite Yamaha?
Re: Ducati... can't help but agree.
ok ok Satellite Ducati RIP 2012
C'mon Dani! Show some fight, son!
Yes. Great rides by lorenzo and crutchlow. Can't see stoner prevailing barring major application of resources by honda or bad luck for lorenzo.
Ah yes, because HRC, the brand with 75% of the podium position today is ..... Its must be the tires hold back Honda from getting both their riders on the podium, eh my someday to be my dear friend.Not sure how this line of reasoning jives with the reality of the results. Stoner can shake his head all he want while looking the rear tire in parc ferme, but it still doesn't prove anything against the overwhelming evidence. Honda is fine, still the best. The tires are fine, still allowing them to out qual and battle for the lead. That he got simply beat by a man who is super focused is zero to do with Stoner's equipment. I attribute these results to Lorenzo's mindset, that is, a man who started off the season knowing he would need to be perfect to beat Stoner. And Jorge has risen to that challenge, period.
Did I say other than lorenzo was a deserved winner, or have I said in the lead up to this race other than that lorenzo is likely the best of them and that if/when he wins this year it will be because he is better and more versatile?
How did your boy do, btw?. Is he shredding his tyres because lorenzo is much better than him? (I wouldn't necessarily disagree if this is your contention).
Yes. Great rides by lorenzo and crutchlow. Can't see stoner prevailing barring major application of resources by honda or bad luck for lorenzo.
This is what you said:
Lets not start splitting hairs.
Friend, you qualified Stoner's result against Lorenzo. Honda needs to apply great resources if Stoner is to have a chance at challenging Lorenzo for the title? What does this imply? C',mon dude. Its Honda's problem? Most people will tell you Honda is the best package on the grid, how do you think they got that way? It sure wasn't a lack of resources.
Brining up Nicky to make a point? I'm not biting, you know the answer my friend.
Most people will tell you Honda is the best package on the grid,
You are drawing implications I did not intend, whether this reflects on you or me I am not sure. I agree honda have already expended much greater resources than yamaha, and I was saying that the way the bikes and riders look at the moment, stoner will only win if honda expends a lot more resources to beat lorenzo through bike superiority, or if lorenzo has bad luck; I am not sure with what in regard to this you take issue, other than perhaps adopting the "straw man" logical fallacy which you have decried in the past.
I conflated your post with rossiofskys (apologies rossiofsky) and changed it before seeing your reply; I was referring to his boy rossi rather than your boy hayden (for whom I have nothing but respect), nevertheless I am interested as I said in my revised post in how you can discern between ducati tyre problems being due to a crap bike and hrc tyre problems being imaginary.
Everyone is saying how the Yamaha is the best bike, and you come out with crap.
Lorenzo - Champions ride
Stoner - just doing his job
Pedrosa - weak (Marquez has your job)
Bautista - thats better than most of us expected
Spies - that was crap ride, you just lost your job to the guy behind you
Cal - Awesome Alien!
Hayden - Time for WSBK
Bradl - as expected
Rossi - try harder
Barbera - Good Effort!
Karel abraham did say this on the Australian TV coverage, but I would not, but rather that lorenzo on his current bike is the best, as is fairly commonly the case with whomever wins the world championship.
My friend, you are drawing implications I did not intend, whether this reflects on you or me I am not sure. I agree honda have already expended much greater resources than yamaha, and I was saying that the way the bikes and riders look at the moment, stoner will only win if honda expends a lot more resources to beat lorenzo through bike superiority, or if lorenzo has bad luck; I am not sure with what in regard to this you take issue, other than perhaps adopting the "straw man" logical fallacy which you have decried in the past.
I conflated your post with rossiofskys (apologies rossiofsky) and changed it before seeing your reply; I was referring to his boy rossi rather than your boy hayden (for whom I have nothing but respect), nevertheless I am interested as I said in my revised post in how you can discern between ducati tyre problems being due to a crap bike and hrc tyre problems being imaginary.
Keshav' timestamp='1339942325' post='319564 said:This.
No need to draw implications, you are writing them down well enough. You imply something must happen extraordinary with Honda for Stoner to challenge. "Can't see stoner prevailing barring major application of resources by honda or bad luck for lorenzo." I'd submit, if there is a strawman argument here, its surely your doing by adopting the "bike superiority" position, especially being ironic since Stoner is on the superior manufacture.
Back in 2007 when Stoner was doing well it was very much accepted that a good part of what made the bike competitive was the fact they'd been working with BS to make the bike work well with the BS tire.
Not saying there's any conspiracies - simply that BS development towards a tire that heats up faster has been to the detriment of Honda.
That - along with the (as I understand it) last minute change in weight regulations has put the Honda at a disadvantage.
As is apparent in the case of Ducati - throwing money at a problem doesn't always make it go away.
....but hes still overrated....Ben Spies got a decent result but not where he should be for sure. I see Migs still hating on all things American.
I will say it again slowly. I was not entering into any discussion as to whether honda is superior overall currently, concerning which I am uncertain if you want to know; I don't lack much certainty that they have already expended more resources than yamaha. I was saying that honda would have to spend a lot more money to make their bike still better for stoner to beat lorenzo, freely conceding lorenzo is outriding him at present .
I am also saying the current tyre is not the tyre of stoner's or honda's preference, which is a matter of public record. It looks like stoner was correct in his preference at least as far as he was concerned as well. This is not necessarily unfair particularly given that all riders have the same tyre , although I did say in one early pre-race post that I don't see why they could not have either offered both new tyres that were developed by bridgestone or continued with the previous tyre along with the new as had been the case for the first 5 races; I still don't see why they couldn't do this, as it happens.
Well my brotha, I've read nowhere that Stoner has said the problem with the new tire is that it heats up faster. Since you want to buy into Mikes tire assertion, please explain how his complaint about the rear tire today (as the reason for not having the pace to stick with Lorenzo) jives with Stoner's preference for the other FRONT tire choice as detrimental to Honda? It seems this tire conspiracy being pushed by some Stoner fans keeps shifting a bit. How its detrimental to Honda simply does not bare out the reality of the podium positions so far. No Lorenzo, and HRC are 1-2 most of the time if not all of the time. Does that sound familiar?