<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ooost @ Apr 19 2006, 12:32 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>There were many complaints that Laguna was too small for MotoGP bikes and Barber is even smaller.
ooost, laguna is smaller than barber bro. 2.38 for laguna, 2.30 for barber.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ooost @ Apr 19 2006, 12:32 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>it would have to be at a big horsepower hungry track like Miller Motorsports Park or Road America.
miller would be the track i think, still not very close, but the pics i've seen of the place look spectacular! it's already fim homolagated & the track is 4.5 miles in it's longest configureation. the garages are state of the art & very large. supposedly something like 85% of the viewing spots u can see 100% of the track. no bad seats
& to top that off my wifes cousin lives 30 min away
as far as road america.... well i'd be nice but we both know that won't happen. to remote as u even stated in a previous thread & i dout they will spend the coin to upgrade to gp standards. but who knows, maybe
ooost, laguna is smaller than barber bro. 2.38 for laguna, 2.30 for barber.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ooost @ Apr 19 2006, 12:32 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>it would have to be at a big horsepower hungry track like Miller Motorsports Park or Road America.
miller would be the track i think, still not very close, but the pics i've seen of the place look spectacular! it's already fim homolagated & the track is 4.5 miles in it's longest configureation. the garages are state of the art & very large. supposedly something like 85% of the viewing spots u can see 100% of the track. no bad seats