<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (vespix @ Aug 23 2006, 05:04 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Oh, I didn't expect this to be so controversial (I bet you did, Ros, hehe).
1. Did Edwards suffer to lead in Assen. Nope.
2. Has the M1 been overtaken in any single straight so far. Humm, no.
3. Does the M1 accelerate more than the Honda. Yes, LeMans and Brno (Toby Moody, the old ...., not being suspect of bias to Pedrosa, couldn't help but shouting at the lap 17 in Brno:
Pedrosa [is] struggling against the Yamaha's power!
Pedrosa didn't have a chance to try and chase Capirossi in Brno, like he naively tried in Jerez, because he still is too cautious in regards to Hayden and Rossi.
I agree that if you are a rookie, you'll want a Honda. If are a super-champion and you want the power of a whole factory behind you, you'll want the Yamaha.
Again, Rossi is right, the man prevails. Man meaning talent, plus experience plus motivation. That's why he won.
P.S.
Skidmark, c'mon, Dunlop plus anything, Yamaha or else, is equal to zero. Checa is racing for fun.
Good points Ves, assen, you got me there, edwards rode his pants off and the bike worked a dream.
le mans, the yam looked so fast there i reckon it was as tuned up as far as it could be and it in the end it .... bolts.
And yes dunlop are racing for fun, it's less embarrasing than stopping their involvement in motogp, they've gotta up their game.
As to whether the honda is superior to anything else, i really do think so, but i could be wrong. i do believe that the m1 is so much 'rossi's bike' that it would be very difficult for anyone else to be consistently competitive on it, no controversy here.