This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Rossi set to race on Bridgestone in 2008

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Racejumkie @ Oct 24 2007, 04:32 PM) [snapback]96929[/snapback]<div class='quotemain'>
It’s scandalous and disgraceful how Dorna (and other elements involved) have exposed (once again) that MotoGP is entirely a Rossi (and Pedrosa) show; what is more amazing is that “some” of their fans refuse to see the gross inequitable preferential treatment. This tire issue has played out exceedingly transparent for the world to see what MotoGP is really about, regardless of what happens now, it is apparent that there are only two players that count. It is obvious, that Dorna (and its enablers) perceive the rest of the riders as grid filler to make it appear as an authentic competition. It is increasingly obvious that the last two world champions have not pleased Dorna, and frankly, they see it as an unacceptable result and detrimental to their business and status quo. This is why they have made desperate maneuvers to rectify and regain control of the current situation by strong arming, coercing, and despicably colluding with Yamaha and Bridgestone to only get Rossi (and possibly Pedrosa) what they want--its their riders above every one else.

This is just a short thought, but I will return to add a few more comments, especially in response to the shoddily argued rationale (mere fanaticism) for the preferential treatment to justify this tire issue.

then right on cue we have the infamous jumkie taking on the same old line whenever theres a slight neg to do with rossi .

where the proof jumkie. and dont quote some ..... news report cos they mean ...., and thats been proved how contradictory they all are on this.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(jazkat @ Oct 24 2007, 01:03 PM) [snapback]96877[/snapback]<div class='quotemain'>
then if you think that isnt ruined tyre i would hate to see what your car or bike tyres look like, your probably driving or riding around on the rim and totally unaware of it. lol (dont take it personally)



<
.... that's what the sparks are! thanks jazkat! No offence taken
<
It looks like there was a drying line appearing in the first onboard shot on that video and in my experience the shards of rubber coming off Rossi's tyre look like they're the same shredding any wet tyre would do in the same situation, that's all.
But it doesn't matter, we're at crossed purposes, Le Mans isn't what we're arguing about, it's the scandalous way that the sport is being run by those in power. This is the real argument going on here...



<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(povol @ Oct 24 2007, 02:12 PM) [snapback]96886[/snapback]<div class='quotemain'>
You all act like Rossi is the only guy ever to blister a tire.This is not a debate about who has the best tire,that was decided long ago.This is a debate about preferential treatment I remember pictures of Haydens bike after the US Gp in 06 and his tires were identical to that except for one thing,he won the race.You all can make all the excuses you want, and you can try to justify in your minds that he is not behind this,but a concensus of fans that are not looking at this thru Rossi colored glasses see it for what it is.I can hear it now,if he fails on Bridgestones.Waaaaa
Waaaa,we are not getting the same stuff Casey is getting.

Without doubt, there'll be something else to cry about.



<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Racejumkie @ Oct 24 2007, 04:32 PM) [snapback]96929[/snapback]<div class='quotemain'>
It’s scandalous and disgraceful how Dorna (and other elements involved) have exposed (once again) that MotoGP is entirely a Rossi (and Pedrosa) show; what is more amazing is that “some” of their fans refuse to see the gross inequitable preferential treatment. This tire issue has played out exceedingly transparent for the world to see what MotoGP is really about, regardless of what happens now, it is apparent that there are only two players that count. It is obvious, that Dorna (and its enablers) perceive the rest of the riders as grid filler to make it appear as an authentic competition. It is increasingly obvious that the last two world champions have not pleased Dorna, and frankly, they see it as an unacceptable result and detrimental to their business and status quo. This is why they have made desperate maneuvers to rectify and regain control of the current situation by strong arming, coercing, and despicably colluding with Yamaha and Bridgestone to only get Rossi (and possibly Pedrosa) what they want--its their riders above every one else.



bravo jumkie!
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(roger-m @ Oct 24 2007, 08:39 AM) [snapback]96931[/snapback]<div class='quotemain'>
then right on cue we have the infamous jumkie taking on the same old line whenever theres a slight neg to do with rossi .

where the proof jumkie. and dont quote some ..... news report cos they mean ...., and thats been proved how contradictory they all are on this.


I love you too Roger.

I live in California, if you've been watching the news, we are in a bit of a problem. But like our governor says—“I'll be back”.

Yeah, and coming after you, The Leader of The Mindless Cheerleading Squad
<
<
<
<
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Racejumkie @ Oct 24 2007, 05:10 PM) [snapback]96936[/snapback]<div class='quotemain'>
I love you too Roger.

I live in California, if you've been watching the news, we are in a bit of a problem. But like our governor says—“I'll be back”.

Yeah, and coming after you, The Leader of The Mindless Cheerleading Squad
<
<
<
<


WTF, so we have been demoted from cult (last year) to squad (this year)
<
<
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(roger-m @ Oct 24 2007, 11:32 AM) [snapback]96928[/snapback]<div class='quotemain'>
your starting to get right on my ..... change the record will you !
as its been said time and time over, THERES NO ....... PROOF WHATS SO EVER ABOUT PREFERENTIAL TREATMENT".
for .... sake, you were the same last year bleating on about nicky clutch and how the big H were conspiring against him. we have all seen the tyres but non of us could see the clutch, double standards, all you do is stereotype rossi fans to try and make your point. mabe its because you old and stuck in your ways but its clear to me that nothing anybody says or proves will ever sway you because your just plain anti rossi and rossi fans. then you have the gaul to say "i used to be a rossi fan" no more than a thinly veiled attempt to hide your true feeling.

Change your record, and quit acting like Rossi's prom date.There is also a segment of people on this planet who say THERE IS NO ....... PROOF THAT MAN EVER LANDED ON THE MOON,OR MUSLIMS DIDNT FLY PLANES INTO THE WORLD TRADE CENTER.They are discounted as whacko's.Most reasonable people see this for what it is.You dont,no biggie!
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(povol @ Oct 24 2007, 06:34 PM) [snapback]96956[/snapback]<div class='quotemain'>
Change your record, and quit acting like Rossi's prom date.There is also a segment of people on this planet who say THERE IS NO ....... PROOF THAT MAN EVER LANDED ON THE MOON,OR MUSLIMS DIDNT FLY PLANES INTO THE WORLD TRADE CENTER.They are discounted as whacko's.Most reasonable people see this for what it is.You dont,no biggie!

whatever
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(povol @ Oct 24 2007, 06:34 PM) [snapback]96956[/snapback]<div class='quotemain'>
Change your record, and quit acting like Rossi's prom date.There is also a segment of people on this planet who say THERE IS NO ....... PROOF THAT MAN EVER LANDED ON THE MOON,OR MUSLIMS DIDNT FLY PLANES INTO THE WORLD TRADE CENTER.They are discounted as whacko's.Most reasonable people see this for what it is.You dont,no biggie!

<
<
<
you alright povol
<
and if man went to the moon,why hasn't he ever been back ?? second thoughts, dont even go there
<
<
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(povol @ Oct 24 2007, 07:34 PM) [snapback]96956[/snapback]<div class='quotemain'>
Change your record, and quit acting like Rossi's prom date.There is also a segment of people on this planet who say THERE IS NO ....... PROOF THAT MAN EVER LANDED ON THE MOON,OR MUSLIMS DIDNT FLY PLANES INTO THE WORLD TRADE CENTER.They are discounted as whacko's.Most reasonable people see this for what it is.You dont,no biggie!


Take a look in the mirror. We are not the once speculating around the all including conspiracy. That's you Povol, not us.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(roger-m @ Oct 24 2007, 10:46 PM) [snapback]96994[/snapback]<div class='quotemain'>
if man went to the moon,why hasn't he ever been back ?? second thoughts, <strike>dont even</strike> go there
<
<


Don't think it is possible to get net access from the moon
<
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Racejumkie @ Oct 24 2007, 05:32 PM) [snapback]96929[/snapback]<div class='quotemain'>
It’s scandalous and disgraceful how Dorna (and other elements involved) have exposed (once again) that MotoGP is entirely a Rossi (and Pedrosa) show; what is more amazing is that “some” of their fans refuse to see the gross inequitable preferential treatment.

What preferantial treatment are we talking about here?
IF, and only if rossi end up with stones, there might have been what I consider unacceptable pressure from Dorna towards Bridgestone. Even if that is the case, what did rossi gain?

After all there is more people here then me that suspect that this might be a huge mistake (if it comes through)

But FIM and Dorna are handing out different kind of preferential treatment is nothing new, is it?
- Dunlop have no tire limit.
- Team KR recieve financial relief
They also lobby, push and pull teams and manufacturers where they want them and has allways done. (Hondas engine lease to KR for one)
All i all this is little less than business as usual and is about making money.
I think they are right about doing something, but wrong in how they do it (if they actually are pressuring Bridgestone.)

That Rossi might and up as the only new rider reciving stones that's no big mystery by it self. Who would be able to say no when the most popular rider come to you and ask for your equipment. Even as desperate as he is willing to leave his teammate behind on others equipment if that it what it takes to get your equipment.
Who woudn't be able to squeeze in that rider?
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Babelfish @ Oct 24 2007, 11:25 PM) [snapback]96999[/snapback]<div class='quotemain'>
What preferantial treatment are we talking about here?
IF, and only if rossi end up with stones, there might have been what I consider unacceptable pressure from Dorna towards Bridgestone. Even if that is the case, what did rossi gain?

After all there is more people here then me that suspect that this might be a huge mistake (if it comes through)

But FIM and Dorna are handing out different kind of preferential treatment is nothing new, is it?
- Dunlop have no tire limit.
- Team KR recieve financial relief
They also lobby, push and pull teams and manufacturers where they want them and has allways done. (Hondas engine lease to KR for one)
All i all this is little less than business as usual and is about making money.
I think they are right about doing something, but wrong in how they do it (if they actually are pressuring Bridgestone.)

That Rossi might and up as the only new rider reciving stones that's no big mystery by it self. Who would be able to say no when the most popular rider come to you and ask for your equipment. Even as desperate as he is willing to leave his teammate behind on others equipment if that it what it takes to get your equipment.
Who woudn't be able to squeeze in that rider?


Seeing as Bridgstone had already stated they couldn't supply any more riders, it would seem that they couldn't squeeze in even Rossi.
And then suddenly they could.........
That stinks of 'gross inequitable preferential treatment' to me.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Helix @ Oct 25 2007, 12:36 AM) [snapback]97000[/snapback]<div class='quotemain'>
Seeing as Bridgstone had already stated they couldn't supply any more riders, it would seem that they couldn't squeeze in even Rossi.
And then suddenly they could.........
That stinks of 'gross inequitable preferential treatment' to me.


One rider are very different form one team, not to mention two teams.
Espesially when that rider is Rossi. It's a pretty deperate prayer from Rossi to leave Michelin alone and I'm pretty sure Bridgestone didn't take that possibility into the consideration before thier first statement. In addition, it's harder for Micheli to leave the sport just because of one rider.

But even so, it has nothing to do with preferential treatment. The best rider and those with best potential has allways gotten the best equipment. That's just the way it is. If you don't like that fact you should drop following the sport. And regardless of rider preferences here on the forum, Rossi are still the one with the highest market value out there. Then next hardly reach up to his knee sliders.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Helix @ Oct 24 2007, 11:36 PM) [snapback]97000[/snapback]<div class='quotemain'>
Seeing as Bridgstone had already stated they couldn't supply any more riders, it would seem that they couldn't squeeze in even Rossi.
And then suddenly they could.........
That stinks of 'gross inequitable preferential treatment' to me.

stinks of a massive free advertising campaign for bridgstone to me, milking it for all its worth.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE<div class='quotemain'> Rossi are still the one with the highest market value out there.

Which is precisely why he gets preferential treatment.

Not that I blame him, he's got the power to get what he wants, and he's got it.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(jazkat @ Oct 25 2007, 01:36 AM) [snapback]96930[/snapback]<div class='quotemain'>
hahahahha funny guy thats why i posted the videos, the debate was michelin tyres and when i said, THERE ARE ALSO 2 FROM THIS SEASON i said that because i couldnt tell that was from this season or last.....


yes but the videos show absolutely nothing in terms of your argument .. the Lemans is just water and the other shot is very likely the result of an offtrack excursion .... if it is indeed really what you are assuming it is ... and I say this with the knowledge that this is a "youtube" vid. of a rapidly spinning tyre
<


The problem here is "the followers" are all saying "oh boohoo" poor Rossi had bad tyres this years thats why he lost .... that and ... its the bike ... and the electronics .... and his deodorant wasn't up to spec. LOL ....

but how about taking some pictures of other folks tyres etc, too then if we get serious about your charge that Rossi would have won if all things were equal ..... we can ascertain that for ourselves ... from evidence you provide if you do.

buy submitting partial and speculative evidence you are just raising further doubt as to your assumptions.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(BarryMachine @ Oct 25 2007, 12:25 AM) [snapback]97005[/snapback]<div class='quotemain'>

The problem here is "the followers" are all saying "oh boohoo" poor Rossi had bad tyres this years thats why he lost .... that and ... its the bike ... and the electronics .... and his deodorant wasn't up to spec. LOL ....


no where not !
where just saying that rossi didn't feel his tyres were as good as the competition so he wanted to change.
you can read into that as much as you like mate,you could always quote this "follower" who has said that in this thread.
 
Rossi has lost alot of respect with this current betrayal of Michelin.. I dont care what your excuse is, the fact that he appears to be in cahoots with Dorna really stinks and makes the entire MotoGP paddock look about as rigged as F1 (ugly) ..

With all do respect to the guy, im sure alot of fans of motogp, his competitors and team members will be disgusted with the way 'Vale' is acting, if he gets his way and races on Bridgestones next year, I hope Michelin mop the floor with them...
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(roger-m @ Oct 25 2007, 09:39 AM) [snapback]97006[/snapback]<div class='quotemain'>
where just saying that rossi didn't feel his tyres were as good as the competition so he wanted to change.


and I am saying that this is just a very poor excuse for natural lessening of performance with age .... it is a very unreasonable assumption to presume Rossi is going to continue to perform as he has in the past ... especially given his performance as of the past two years.

And the really weird thing is ... if Stoner were taken off the books for all the stat.s ..... there would be no Michelin tyre problem ... in fact it would appear as though Michelin was the current Bridgestone.

So because the winner is on a different brand bike or tyre or whatever .... all stat.s will naturally be biased to show favour towards the winners "product" .... but the manner with which this "tyre war" or "discussion" has taken up so much interest astounds me .... it seems to have reached the proportion of religious zealotry ...

In reality the only fix for the us "non-believers" is for Rossi to ride next year on Bridgestone .... so in fact if Rossi changes ( which I think would be good ) he proves all the argument .. one way or the other. Same as when he went Yamaha ...

What I do object to is the intrusion of speculative crap as argument for or against the topic ... such as those videos ??? ( if you had to give a ruling on tyre wear based on those videos ... what would you say!!?? ) And a picture of supposed tyre wear from a race in which there are possible other reasons for the wear!!

So only one man can answer all this "hoohickey" .... Rossi ... and to his credit, in my book .... he is attempting to do just that ..... its just that the method in which it is being done seems to be creating so much "drama" over nothing really.


Out of the tyre war thing we can expect:

If Rossi stays Michelin ... and looses in 08 .... well maybe its still the tyres??

If Rossi stays Michelin ... and wins in 08 .... well yes we ail all say " he has been reborn!!! .. the saviour is back!! ... the problem was Rossi but now he has returned !! haleluja!!" ...
<


If Rossi goes Bridgestone ... and wins in 08 .... well yes .... looks like it was the tyres!! But then the Stoner fans will say "ts the paint its the white paint!! ... Red is supposed to be faster but Stoner is being ripped off they are giving him second rate special slow red paint so that Rossi wins"!!
<
<


If Rossi goes Bridgestone .... and looses in 08 ... well we should be then sayng " oh well yeah Hayden did whin then" ..... " and Stoner reaaly did win!!" ...... but more likely some will say "its the brand of bandaid Rossi puts o his nose then!!" LOL

So anyway Rossi going Bridgestone will just semi-answer a public debate over which tyre is the best. So bring it on in 08.

Either way there are going to be winners amongst us Sofa-racers .... and "told you so" rights for years
<
<


hahaha I don't know
<
.... I used to like watching the GP's for seeing someone have a good ride ...... one thing Rossi has brought to GP is religiously fanatic fans
<
<
its like watching a soccer match !!


The real reason Rossi did not "return" this year and was indeed dominated ......
Adriana-Stoner-0000012499.jpg

<
<
 
Found this on Kropotkin Gp Blog
When A Spec Tire Isn’t A Good Idea

On Saturday of the MotoGP race at Motegi, DORNA CEO Carmelo Ezpeleta made the announcement that MotoGP was very seriously considering the move to a spec tire, much like Formula 1, World Superbike and the Parts Canada Superbike series. A final decision will be made following the race at Sepang in Malaysia.

The impetus behind this decision has been the emergence, and occasionally the dominance of Bridgestone this year. It has been felt by a few riders that tires, rather than the riders or the motorcycles, have been the deciding factor in races. Valentino Rossi has been quoted as saying that people are fans of motorcycle racing, they do not root for tire brands. I guess that is unless you don’t count the section in the main grandstands at Motegi, where the fans wore yellow shirts and had Dunlop flags.

The fascinating thing about this potential decision, and it’s resulting impact, is that the push did not come from the tire manufacturers. The official statements coming from Michelin, Dunlop and Bridgestone were that they all wanted and enjoyed the competition as it stood. According to Julian Ryder, on the Eurosport broadcast of the Motegi race, his highly placed sources said that Messrs Rossi and Pedrosa were behind the movement.

2007 began a new era in MotoGP, that being the move to 800cc machines. The team that, publicly at least, appeared to be out testing and developing the 800cc package before anyone else was Ducati, along with their tire supplier, Bridgestone. Suzuki, also a Bridgestone equipped team, could in many ways be added to Ducati, in that for the 2006 season the chassis they were working with was the direction they intended to go for the 800cc machines.

Over the last six years Bridgestone has been working and developing a tire to compete with Michelin. More times than not this was with teams that had little shot at a podium, let alone winning. The big break for Bridgestone came when Ducati switched from Michelin for the 2005 season, it would be the first full factory team with which they worked with. Even working closely with Ducati it has been an uphill struggle to gain parity given that Bridgestone’s facilities are based in Japan. Their ability to quickly fly in tires during a race weekend were limited to those events on the Pacific Rim.

Michelin’s two primary teams, Repsol Honda and the (now) Fiat Yamaha, did not bring out their development machines publicly until very late in 2006. One would have to surmise that Michelin’s tire development did not begin in earnest until this time.

For years, Michelin had become known for taking the data from the race track on say a Friday or Saturday, sending that to the factory in Clermont-Ferrand, and having new tires based on that data flown in overnight. This, along with being the supplier for the two dominate teams over the last 15 years, the factory Honda and Yamaha entries, have lead to their dominance of the premier class and why they have been the tires of the World Champion every year since 1992. Until this year, Wayne Rainey was the last non Michelin equipped rider to win the championship, he did it that year on Dunlops.

Add to the motorcycle rules change, Michelin, Bridgestone and Dunlop agreed to a new tire regulation for 2007. The new rules limited the number of tires racers had access to on the weekend, and, that the decision on which tires were to be included in that allocation were to be chosen on Thursday, the day before the machines took to the track. This all in an effort to “control costs”.

So, we see a major change in motorcycle and tire regulations. The rider tagged as “maybe the greatest rider of all time” Valentino Rossi and his team struggle. Dani Pedrosa, the rider for whom the 800cc era of motorcycles were made for like a Saville Row suit, also not having the expected results, and some would lead you to believe that the ground was shaking with the four horseman of the apocalypse just over the crest, the leading rider of said group on a red steed with a 27 on it’s snout.

Could Michelin have been caught off guard for all these changes? Perhaps. Lets also not forget all the turn over at the top of Michelin in the last 18 months. The CEO of the company, and grandson of the founder, Edouard Michelin was killed in a boating accident, long time Director Of Competition Pierre Dupasquier and Head Boss Nicolas Goubert have also moved on from the motorcycle division to retirement and other jobs inside the company. This change at the top of the leadership along with the withdrawal from Formula 1 and having to redeploy thousands of people who worked in that area certainly could have caused enough distraction for them to take their eye off the ball.

Given all the major changes in the regulation, is it fair to make such a rash decision before even one season in the new era is in the books? There is this thing called the law of unintended consequences. Just because you set up the rules to have one effect, doesn’t mean that it will. After all the 800cc regulations were written to slow the motorcycles down, and yet on many tracks they are turning quicker lap times. Fifteen rounds into an eighteen round championship does not a long term trend make.

MotoGP is a prototype championship. It is and should be designed to be the bleeding edge of development when it comes to the world of motorcycle roadracing. For a production based championship such as WSBK or the Canadian series where it can make sense to try to control costs, give privateers a shot with being on some of the same equipment as the front line factory riders, an argument for a control tire can be legitimate. It could be argued that the Pirelli spec tire may have even saved the WSBK series.

For the premier series though you want the best riders on the best machines on the best tires. If a control tire were to occur in MotoGP, the first couple years could be disastrous. These machines are so diverse in engine and chassis design that no one tire could fairly represent them all. In a further effort to “control cost” and “level the playing field” tens of millions of dollars will be spent on all fronts trying to make this arrangement work. Money that will have to come from budgets and sponsors that do not exist or are completely tapped out.

When Mick Doohan and Valentino Rossi dominated the series, there was the usual noise about them being the best riders, on the best equipment. Mick talked about moving from Honda several times, but never did. Rossi like Doohan dominated with the Honda and Michelins, but wanted a new challenge, He moved to Yamaha and continued to dominate and no one blinked an eye. In the middle of both of their championship runs, no one ever came out and said it was wrong that they were dominating and things needed to be changed. Yet now that Ducati with Bridgestone have had a break out year, and that this new pup at the controls who seemed to be throwing his Honda on Michelins down the road at least once a weekend last year are the new champions, you would have thought the village tramp had walked in to St. Peter's for Christmas Mass and gotten communion for the Pope himself.

No credit seems to be given that there was a package at work here. Stoner has been, for the most part been the only Ducati at the sharp end of the grid all year. His team mate Loris Capirossi has only two podiums and a win at Motegi, where he had won the previous two years. The D’Antin team, who are on very similar equipment have only one podium at Mugello with Alex Barros, so it can’t be just the bike.

Bridgestone has swept the podium five times this season, Turkey, in the wet at Le Mans (literally in Michelin’s back yard) Laguna (where they were no where last year), Misano and Motegi, where the timing of switching from wet to dry tires was more a factor. Michelin have only swept the podium once this year at Jerez. However, they have had two riders on the podium six different occasions, Bridgestone, only three. Out of 45 possible podium positions through the Motegi race, Michelin has 18 and Bridgestone has 27. Had Bridgestone been the tire brand with 40% of the podiums rather than Michelin would anyone have bat an eye? I think not. The comment most likely would have been that Bridgestone is coming along nicely and doing well.

It’s not all the tires though. Stoner was quick last year, he often could be found running on the top five in most races. His bout of crashing could have had more to do with being on a second line Honda on third line Michelins. Michelins have long been known as having grip to the point where they don’t. Casey came from years of running Dunlops in 125 and 250 where they slide before they go, Bridgestone fronts have been said to have a feel much like these Dunlops.

Lets also not forget about Dunlop. They were, in the past, a bit of a joke, their riders two to four seconds off the pace in 2006. As 2007 begins to wind down we see their qualifying tires beginning to make some noise and there race tires coming around as well. Grip towards the end of the race being the next thing they need to work on. Would this rapid development occur if there wasn’t the high level of competition?

What can you take away from the 2007 season is that we had a perfect storm. You had a team and tire company that have been working closely for a number of years and got an early jump on development. You then bring in a supremely gifted rider. One who has always shown well on non front line equipment. For what ever reasons one plus one plus one equaled seven. All this being said, it’s hard to believe that Michelin as a tire company and Honda and Yamaha as manufacturers won’t both step up in the off season and bring a much more competitive product to the table.

If in 2008 we were to get much the same results as 2007, I still don’t feel a spec tire for the premier class is called for. While two years of data could be called a trend, it could also be called years of hard work paying off, and employing one of the best riders in the world.

Too many things in the world are being dumbed down. Being the best, being at the top of the mountain, being World Champion SHOULD BE hard work. Racing is, in many ways, a snap shot of life. There ARE haves and have nots. The world, life, racing, it ISN’T fair. Sometimes money, talent and hard work isn’t enough. However, it’s all those things in the end that make ultimately succeeding that much sweeter and pleasurable. Just because the apple cart has been upset doesn’t mean that a reactionary decision is called for. To quote Sean Connery as Captain Marko Ramius in the movie The Hunt for Red October, “A little revolution now and again can be a healthy
 

Recent Discussions