Make sure to yell “SNS! Rigged system!!! Stoner was better”!! Etc when you catch a glimpse of Rossi!
Whilst I know you're joking, (and I did chuckle) you have to admit the huge role that tyres play in a successful race, it has been seen time and time again that, even with control tyres, the wrong choice can scupper the chances of even the best rider.
I don't think that there is a person on this forum who does not acknowledge that.
So to have the advantage of tyres made especially for you based on your data gathered that week from the track you're going to be racing on? It is impossible to deny the advantage that that gives, surely?
This isn't meant to be an insult or taking sides, but just looking at it logically from a pure engineering point of view.
So, if we know the above to be absolutely correct, then it is also logical to state that Vale did have an advantage during the SNS period.
I am not saying that he would not have won without the SNS, just that he had an advantage. Whether any given individual feels that this either taints or nullifies his titles under SNS is up to that person.
For what it's worth I think Vale had better race craft than Casey but Casey was faster.
If you put the 2 on identical bikes and tyres, Casey wins 9 times out of 10. But that is just my opinion and therefore has no bearing on reality.