3461111363857295
That was an insightful post... until the last sentence. If winning races isn't competitive, what is?
3461201363871149
I personally liked the first sentence. Planting the seeds to take credit for development if it ever comes good. :lol:
3461211363872448
Exactly: Stoner made the Ducati look more competitive than it actually was, and JB, Rossi and Ducati bought it. What did I say?
3461211363872448
Exactly: Stoner made the Ducati look more competitive than it actually was, and JB and Rossi bought it. What did I say?
3461451363886263
Really we know it was the tyres not Stoner, I mean when you're not mental & have even a vague grip on reality.
3461631363900083
Fixed It. Ducati always thought the bike was great as soon as Stoner through a leg over it.
I think Stoner leaving was more a result of the lack of respect and remuneration he was receiving from Marlboro for his effort, while they threw huge sums at everyone else who thought they could ride it.
3461711363907731
Not really, because they began modifying the bike "to make it more rideable for riders other than Stoner", while Stoner was still there. They were aware there was some problem, after Capirossi, Melandri and Hayden, three world champions, failed on it. I agree Stoner was pissed off when they offered more money to Lorenzo, but at that point the relation was already falling apart.
3461781363915114
You are probably a lot closer to ducati than anyone else on here, but there is absolutely no doubt from contemporary reports that they were endeavouring to produce a more generally suitable bike. Unfortunately for all parties this was a much more difficult task than anyone supposed, reminiscent of the punch line of the old Irish joke, when the country Irishman after being asked for directions says "well in the first place I wouldn't start from here". I think jorge showed wisdom, because while he may well be a better all round rider than stoner I don't think the bike would have suited him either, and I don't think he was any more likely than stoner, rossi or any one else to "fix" the 2010 bike which wasn't really competitive even for stoner.
Stoner has directly said he was disappointed by the attitude of both marlboro and general ducati management to his 2009 illness, and I agree had decided to leave, likely before the end of 2009.
3461451363886263
Really we know it was the tyres not Stoner, I mean when you're not mental & have even a vague grip on reality.
3461811363923095
Sometimes I picture you in my head Goatie.
I see you walking alone onto a pub full of coal miners, dressed in VR dayglo yellow. And you start the proceeding by saying "what are you cnts looking at?"
3461791363919454
While the idea that Ducati were trying to make the bike more 'suitable' may have been true or just a fob-off (after all, what indications were there that much was being done in this direction?), the reason I dislike the theme is due to it being used (at the time) as an excuse for VS's dire performance on the bike.
The 2010 bike won races. Was the 2011 bike incapable of winning races? That, to me, decides whether it was competitive.
3461831363930518
Something certainly changed for the worse between 2009 and 2010, stoner crashed the thing 5 times in 2010 after having no apparent problems with the stability of the 2009 bike. He could still ride it fast enough to win the odd race, but I don't think anyone can claim he and the bike were competitive for the 2010 championship. He also made repeated statements about the 2010 bike letting go for no apparent reason, after consistently maintaining the 2009 bike was fine and the problem in that year was his health.
3461861363939656
Good ANALysis, Roo.
3461821363927776
Andy my friend, you really need to get out more