Joined Oct 2006
25K Posts | 4K+
Your Mom's House
When SBK gets the guys who can't ride in GP anymore and GP is picking up guys like Spies who won their championship, I would say it's a bit more than perception. When the WSBK champ comes to GP and he makes it to the edge of alien status it tells us all we need to know about WSBK, and remember what you said about Checa. RDP's case is different though and more than enough reason to show why we need more bikes in GP, he has the talent but there wasn't enough money out there to lease anymore of the expensive satellite bikes, dude deserves to be on the grid.
Good points Hawk. However...
Read the highlighted part you just wrote. Then take another look at the part I put in italics. One might say the fact there are no seats in GP because the current grid is untenable, is, in your words, "all we need to know about GP.
Checa yes, but that still leaves Biaggi, Melandri, Aoyama, and probables, DePuniet, Hopkins, not to mention GP interchangeables Crutchlow/Halsam, Rea, Laverty, and I'd add, Abraham, Barbara, Buatista, are no better or worse than a few Wsbk riders.
I disagree with your suggestion, either series has great talent. The only thing I see as the main difference between talent pools between both series is that GP has the number one rider in the world. But beyond that, yes, perception.