Which one and how so?
Last lap he bobbled into Banc de Sabadell and Dani ran into the back of him. From the overhead, it's difficult to determine whether Dani could have held his line, but Marquez was definitely fighting to get the front end to hook up.
Lorenzo: What happened this time?
I find it strange that a rider in a GP race (MM) can take a trip outside of the track and bare no consequences.
So, Lorenzo has turned into Pedrosa, where everything has to line up just right for him to be able to perform at the front. It appears that the days of inch perfect lines and metronomic lap perfection needed to win are over. If he cant adapt his style race to race pending conditions, he will soon be winning a couple of races a year when track layout, tire allotment and track temps match up, IF, his crew gets the set up right.maybe the track get cooler as the race progressed and he lost the grip needed for his style. i think...
I have heard several people on different boards complain about runoffs and no consequences. Did you all ever stop to think that if there was a gravel trap there, they simply wouldnt try anything risky in that corner, which would make the races even more boring to that other group of whiners.
You should learn the rules then.
Running off the track is not against the rules.
Gaining an advantage from it is. Marquez allowed Pedrosa past and pulled in behind, hence gaining no advantage.
You also sound a bit biased?
What are you anti-Marquez, pro Rossi or maybe even pro-Pedrosa?
You'd have a valid point if anyone had done it repeatedly over several laps, but no-one did.I actually pro all of them. But what does it mean 'gain from it'? With the huge run of area at the end of the start-finish strait, a rider can skip 2-3 corners if running through the run off area. Even if not gaining position, perhaps the rider gains fuel/tyres endurance if it is done a few times? I mean if it is not against the rules to use the run off area at will.