KILL TC!!!!!!!

MotoGP Forum

Help Support MotoGP Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Traction Control

  • Certainly!

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Hell no!

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (roger-m @ Feb 26 2009, 07:09 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>guess you didn't read Barros's interview about ducati throwing all there resources at one bike. Barros didn't even have a suspension technician. im not taking away from the wonders stoner has done on that bike but that's not forget different riders get different levels of support and different parts at different time's. we all know it happened at HRC too.
Let's not compare Pramac D'Antin to the Factory Malboro squad. Loris' support would have been similar to Casey's.

Additionally, there's no doubt Casey deserved the support. He earnt it! Loris had his chance, as did Marco.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (roger-m @ Feb 26 2009, 08:02 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Are you really that thick ?
<
<
<
Your being compared to a troll you jerk
<
<


Why would I care whether you feel I am a troll
<
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (BarryMachine @ Feb 26 2009, 11:07 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Why would I care whether you feel I am a troll
<

For .... sake, He was comparing you to supershinya56 not saying you said shinya was super. Jesus h christ i dont know why i bother with you sometimes
<


come on ,now tell us you knew that all the time in a typical Bm predictable way
<
<
Bm is you by the way, in case you couldn't work it out for yourself .
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (BarryMachine @ Feb 25 2009, 08:32 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Another incongruous thing about the "Barros got scolded" myth ......... The points loss between Stoner and Barros was pretty minimal.

Ducati still had a Ducati on the podium.

How good does it look when only Stoner wins/podiums on the Duc. .... not good for Duc. thats for sure ...... the more podiums on "a Duc." the better for Duc. one would have thought
<
Sure they like Stoner winning ...... but you can't tell me Suppo didn't know that if only Stoner was winning the eventual outcome would be that folk would begin to think " its Stoner .... not the Duc." .... as seems to be coming to bear at present ........ though its taken the Rossifans over a year to realise it.
<


What possible benefits would there have been for Duc. to ask Barros to loose on purpose?
Although the marketing geeks probably did want Barros and the other Ducatis finishing well as it would make the brand look better and those marketing geeks do have some influence, I have to believe that positioning the factory for a rider's WC and team WC are far more important.

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (roger-m @ Feb 26 2009, 02:59 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>That may be so, But i was answering slides post where he implys all the ducati's were the same by comparing there results !
<

Yeah, didn't mean to jump down your throat about it. Just wanted to remind everyone that Luis d'Antin is a deadbeat.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Austin @ Feb 26 2009, 02:56 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Although the marketing geeks probably did want Barros and the other Ducatis finishing well as it would make the brand look better and those marketing geeks do have some influence, I have to believe that positioning the factory for a rider's WC and team WC are far more important.


Yeah, didn't mean to jump down your throat about it. Just wanted to remind everyone that Luis d'Antin is a deadbeat.
yes he was, and i fear we all judged the hoff quite harshly prior to finding out about the scumbag luis
<
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (roger-m @ Feb 26 2009, 09:25 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>yes he was, and i fear we all judged the hoff quite harshly prior to finding out about the scumbag luis
<

I think the Hoff has some potential. I was excited to see what he could do for Aprilia in WSBK but they gave away his seat. Should be interesting to see how he comes back from injury in his few wildcard rides.
 
<

I thought Rog & Berry had made up last year after Laguna which resulted in a forum group hug. Did I miss something, or am I mistaking all this beating the .... out of eachother as friendly banter?
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Jumkie @ Feb 27 2009, 06:51 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>
<

I thought Rog & Berry had made up last year after Laguna which resulted in a forum group hug. Did I miss something, or am I mistaking all this beating the .... out of eachother as friendly banter?

<
<
<


Yes well I know I was impressed with his getting all "giggly schoolgirl" over Stoner and his hummer, but I am afraid there is still that "pommy v's convict" thing that has to be sorted through ...... it would seem we are still in the process of that
<
<
<









PS... ....... you are wrong Rog.!! ...... you always are!
<



( see! ,,,, I just can't help it )
<
<
 
Anyone seen this random phrase generator you can put in you e-mail or usenet signature? It generates random insults and ........ everyone different from the previous one.

To me it seems like someone have made a similar thing for web forums, only difference is that it generates whole posts as reply to it's own ........?

Be very careful guys. As it reply with ........ to any of your posts trying to reasoning with this machine it may take over the whole forum. Before we know it it starts replying to it's own ........ filling up the whole forum with .........
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Babelfish @ Feb 26 2009, 05:59 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Anyone seen this random phrase generator you can put in you e-mail or usenet signature? It generates random insults and ........ everyone different from the previous one.

To me it seems like someone have made a similar thing for web forums, only difference is that it generates whole posts as reply to it's own ........?

Be very careful guys. As it reply with ........ to any of your posts trying to reasoning with this machine it may take over the whole forum. Before we know it it starts replying to it's own ........ filling up the whole forum with .........
This post sounds like a lot of ........, Babel.
<
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Babelfish @ Feb 26 2009, 11:59 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Anyone seen this random phrase generator you can put in you e-mail or usenet signature? It generates random insults and ........ everyone different from the previous one.

To me it seems like someone have made a similar thing for web forums, only difference is that it generates whole posts as reply to it's own ........?

Be very careful guys. As it reply with ........ to any of your posts trying to reasoning with this machine it may take over the whole forum. Before we know it it starts replying to it's own ........ filling up the whole forum with .........
what's this machine called ? barry ??
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Babelfish @ Feb 26 2009, 05:59 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Anyone seen this random phrase generator you can put in you e-mail or usenet signature? It generates random insults and ........ everyone different from the previous one.

To me it seems like someone have made a similar thing for web forums, only difference is that it generates whole posts as reply to it's own ........?

Be very careful guys. As it reply with ........ to any of your posts trying to reasoning with this machine it may take over the whole forum. Before we know it it starts replying to it's own ........ filling up the whole forum with .........

<
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (roger-m @ Feb 27 2009, 10:50 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>what's this machine called ? barry ??

GOLD !!!!!
<
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Babelfish @ Feb 27 2009, 06:59 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Anyone seen this random phrase generator you can put in you e-mail or usenet signature? It generates random insults and ........ everyone different from the previous one.

To me it seems like someone have made a similar thing for web forums, only difference is that it generates whole posts as reply to it's own ........?

Be very careful guys. As it reply with ........ to any of your posts trying to reasoning with this machine it may take over the whole forum. Before we know it it starts replying to it's own ........ filling up the whole forum with .........
<
<
<
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Babelfish @ Feb 27 2009, 10:59 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Anyone seen this random phrase generator you can put in you e-mail or usenet signature? It generates random insults and ........ everyone different from the previous one.

To me it seems like someone have made a similar thing for web forums, only difference is that it generates whole posts as reply to it's own ........?

Be very careful guys. As it reply with ........ to any of your posts trying to reasoning with this machine it may take over the whole forum. Before we know it it starts replying to it's own ........ filling up the whole forum with .........


Pot calling the kettle on this one ..... you were just as keen to follow the ........ on most of that list as Rog, is. Just go through the list ..... you came up with the same argument for just about everyone of those "myths" from "Stoner and TC" to "Adrianna wants Rossi" .... your response is always the same at the time then you seem have suddenly changed stance some months later
<
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (BarryMachine @ Feb 27 2009, 07:18 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Pot calling the kettle on this one ..... you were just as keen to follow the ........ on most of that list as Rog, is. Just go through the list ..... you came up with the same argument for just about everyone of those "myths" from "Stoner and TC" to "Adrianna wants Rossi" .... your response is always the same at the time then you seem have suddenly changed stance some months later
<


We have a WINNER.
Now where is that image I'm looking for?
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Austin @ Feb 26 2009, 04:40 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>This post sounds like a lot of ........, Babel.
<

Brilliant!
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Austin @ Feb 27 2009, 01:40 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>This post sounds like a lot of ........, Babel.
<


That is of course a matter of opinion, but at least it was hand witten and with intention. Rest asured it will not replicate it self all over the forum
<
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Babelfish @ Feb 26 2009, 05:59 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>To me it seems like someone have made a similar thing for web forums, only difference is that it generates whole posts as reply to it's own ........?
If I were to summarize traction control's selfish, pernicious histrionics I'd need only one word: perverted. Before I get moving here, let me point out that traction control's ....-and-bull stories run on pure irony. It follows from this that society must soon decide either to plant markers that define the limits of what is effrontive and what is not or else to let traction control mute the voice of anyone who dares to speak out against it. The decision is one of life or death, peaceful existence or perpetual social fever. I can hope only that those in charge realize that traction control's perorations are a mere cavil, a mere scarecrow, one of the last shifts of a desperate and dying cause. Although the destructiveness of traction control's expostulations has been chronicled elsewhere in great and tedious detail it fits too neatly into my thesis to overlook. Hence, I shall chronicle it here as well but only as a quick comment that traction control's subalterns have been staggering around like punch-drunk fighters hit too many times—stunned, confused, betrayed, and trying desperately to rationalize traction control's gutless ipse dixits. It is indubitably not a pretty sight.

The most troubling aspect of traction control's behavior is its intolerance of dissent. Think I'm exaggerating? Just ask any of the most valuable members of our community and they'll all tell you how I hate it when people get their facts thoroughly wrong. For instance, whenever I hear some corporate fat cat make noises about how traction control's vices are the only true virtues, I can't help but think that traction control will do everything in its power to scrap the notion of national sovereignty. No wonder corruption is endemic to our society; one of traction control's dupes once said, "The moon is made of green cheese." Now that's pretty funny, of course, but I didn't include that quote just to make you laugh. I included it to convince you that traction control's politics are evil. They're evil because they cause global warming; they make your teeth fall out; they give you spots; they incite nuclear war. And, as if that weren't enough, traction control's coadjutors say, "75 million years ago, a galactic tyrant named Xenu solved the overpopulation problem of his 76-planet federation by transporting the excess people to Earth, chaining them to volcanoes, and dropping H-bombs on them." Yes, I'm afraid they really do talk like that. It's the only way for them to conceal that I welcome traction control's comments. However, traction control needs to realize that the only effective and responsible course of action is to present a noble vision of who we were, who we are, and who we can potentially be—an often frustrating prescription, to be sure. That's pretty transparent. What's not so transparent is the answer to the following question: Is it so squalid as to think that this can go on forever? A clue might be that I strive to be consistent in my arguments. I can't say that I'm 100% true to this, but traction control's frequent vacillating leads me to believe that it insists that truth is merely a social construct. In the long run, however, it's only fooling itself. Traction control would be better off if it just admitted to itself that its most progressive idea is to overthrow democratic political systems. If that sounds progressive to you, you must be facing the wrong way.

It's precisely because traction control's shell games are a perfect example of overgeneralization and blatant neocolonialism that everybody is probably familiar with the cliche that traction control's undertakings are sheer idiocy. Well, there's a lot of truth in that cliche. Actually, traction control really struck a nerve with me when it said that oligophrenic gasbags are inherently good, sensitive, creative, and inoffensive. That lie is a painful reminder that there is one crucial fact that we must not overlook if we are to perceive our current situation as it is, rather than in the anamorphosis of some "ideology" such as plagiarism or imperialism. Specifically, if you look back over some of my older letters, you'll see that I predicted that traction control would renege on an incredibly large number of promises. And, as I predicted, it did. But you know, that was not a difficult prediction to make. Anyone who has bothered to learn even a little about traction control could have made the same prediction. Let us now get traction control off our backs because in that is our only hope for the future.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (mattsteg @ Feb 27 2009, 11:37 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>If I were to summarize traction control's selfish, pernicious histrionics I'd need only one word: perverted. Before I get moving here, let me point out that traction control's ....-and-bull stories run on pure irony. It follows from this that society must soon decide either to plant markers that define the limits of what is effrontive and what is not or else to let traction control mute the voice of anyone who dares to speak out against it. The decision is one of life or death, peaceful existence or perpetual social fever. I can hope only that those in charge realize that traction control's perorations are a mere cavil, a mere scarecrow, one of the last shifts of a desperate and dying cause. Although the destructiveness of traction control's expostulations has been chronicled elsewhere in great and tedious detail it fits too neatly into my thesis to overlook. Hence, I shall chronicle it here as well but only as a quick comment that traction control's subalterns have been staggering around like punch-drunk fighters hit too many times—stunned, confused, betrayed, and trying desperately to rationalize traction control's gutless ipse dixits. It is indubitably not a pretty sight.

The most troubling aspect of traction control's behavior is its intolerance of dissent. Think I'm exaggerating? Just ask any of the most valuable members of our community and they'll all tell you how I hate it when people get their facts thoroughly wrong. For instance, whenever I hear some corporate fat cat make noises about how traction control's vices are the only true virtues, I can't help but think that traction control will do everything in its power to scrap the notion of national sovereignty. No wonder corruption is endemic to our society; one of traction control's dupes once said, "The moon is made of green cheese." Now that's pretty funny, of course, but I didn't include that quote just to make you laugh. I included it to convince you that traction control's politics are evil. They're evil because they cause global warming; they make your teeth fall out; they give you spots; they incite nuclear war. And, as if that weren't enough, traction control's coadjutors say, "75 million years ago, a galactic tyrant named Xenu solved the overpopulation problem of his 76-planet federation by transporting the excess people to Earth, chaining them to volcanoes, and dropping H-bombs on them." Yes, I'm afraid they really do talk like that. It's the only way for them to conceal that I welcome traction control's comments. However, traction control needs to realize that the only effective and responsible course of action is to present a noble vision of who we were, who we are, and who we can potentially be—an often frustrating prescription, to be sure. That's pretty transparent. What's not so transparent is the answer to the following question: Is it so squalid as to think that this can go on forever? A clue might be that I strive to be consistent in my arguments. I can't say that I'm 100% true to this, but traction control's frequent vacillating leads me to believe that it insists that truth is merely a social construct. In the long run, however, it's only fooling itself. Traction control would be better off if it just admitted to itself that its most progressive idea is to overthrow democratic political systems. If that sounds progressive to you, you must be facing the wrong way.

It's precisely because traction control's shell games are a perfect example of overgeneralization and blatant neocolonialism that everybody is probably familiar with the cliche that traction control's undertakings are sheer idiocy. Well, there's a lot of truth in that cliche. Actually, traction control really struck a nerve with me when it said that oligophrenic gasbags are inherently good, sensitive, creative, and inoffensive. That lie is a painful reminder that there is one crucial fact that we must not overlook if we are to perceive our current situation as it is, rather than in the anamorphosis of some "ideology" such as plagiarism or imperialism. Specifically, if you look back over some of my older letters, you'll see that I predicted that traction control would renege on an incredibly large number of promises. And, as I predicted, it did. But you know, that was not a difficult prediction to make. Anyone who has bothered to learn even a little about traction control could have made the same prediction. Let us now get traction control off our backs because in that is our only hope for the future.
Good to see these are still going around.
 

Attachments

  • acid.jpg
    acid.jpg
    26.9 KB

Recent Discussions

Recent Discussions

Back
Top