- Joined
- Oct 16, 2006
- Messages
- 24,726
- Location
- Your Mom's House
My opinion is that Toni Elias's win on 'special' tyres PROVES that they worked for riders other than your favourite 'hate' target, so again, no point proven...
No point proven in a statement you say proves something? Are you familiar with the word: contradiction?
Let me use your own standard of proof and logic against you then. First of all, you say Elias wining on SNS "proves" others could benefit.
You say SNS "proved" they are win capable tires in the hands of others, so it does prove something.
Now let's try to apply 'logic' to your statement:
By design, those tires were never made to compete against Rossi by Toni Elias, this incident PROVES this fact, therefore, logically Rossi’s rivals were not supposed to compete with tires they could win against him other than a fluke, which this incident illustrates.
Let's recap:
Daniboy: This incident "proves" others can win on SNS (regardless for who they were designed, in this case supposedly for Pedrosa).
Reality: This incident "proves" the guy who won on these tires was never supposed to use them by design.
Daniboy: This incident "proves" others can win on SNS (regardless for who they were designed, in this case supposedly for Pedrosa).
Reality: This incident "proves" the SNS tailored tires were useless for the person they were designed for, Dani Pedrosa, and by fluke proved to be useful for a rider that was not supposed to use them.
Proof, logic, reality. Don't confuse these concepts.