- Joined
- Aug 27, 2007
- Messages
- 11,378
- Location
- Pomona NY
........, you "unreservedly" copped to being caught in another one of your disinformation attempts. You compared Synn to 'Rog' as being a "racist alcoholic fat ....", and even laughably took issue with his car's loud exhaust, WTF, as if you weren't petulant enough whilst it was you who crossed the line by involving his family. I had regrettably ignored your lies about Rog, until you then went after me for standing up for his character, painting me as some forum pariah, when it's been you who has been at the forefront of sowing dysfunction to the forum. Then you try to paint me as fake news when I expose your deviant character. Other than you Kancer, nobody who has actually met me questions my integrity.
Apologize for your lies and mischaracterizations, come clean, admit 'publicly' (like for like) you were wrong wholeheartedly for insulting those who showed you kindness and tolerance, and take responsibility for the reaction you deserved for insulting people's kids, wife, and friends. Then we can bury the hatchet, and move along civil. Until then, expect a rebuff to your lies. Cause and effect, it's simple.
If you live in a glass house don't throw rocks.
Jum, I hope I don't regret this. I've already said I apologize unreservedly for saying insulting things about Rog. There's nothing ambiguous about that.
As to his Bonnie and the kids: nothing was ever said by me on the forum. My comment to Rog was about how his own behavior reflected on them. A lot of heated .... was said by both parties. In the event, anything that was said was said privately and was between me and Rog and he is a big boy and doesn't need anyone to stand up for him. I can't think Rog would want to dredge this up; why then should we?
As I said, he and I got along perfectly well when posting on his site.
The nature of the attacks from "Synn" are so personally malicious and so precisely targeted at aspects of things so specific to my work (despite they're being in no way an accurate reflection of who or what I am) - that no "new" person on this forum could concieveably know those things. So it was only natural that I would think they came from one or two people and those would be you or Rog. As you'd so long refrained from addressing me on the forum, I concluded that it was from Roger. In hindsight - that was poor thinking, as I have since said, I think Roger is long over this and probably doesn't give a .... about me any more. It's just words on the internet and Rog is undoubtedly living his life and his family is just fine and they never ever think of me.
I've said before that I'm always open to reconciliation. Not because I want to look like the "better man". But because before all this .... went down, I was genuinely fond of you. If you saw some of the PMs that passed between myself and others I think you would be surprised. When people asked what the .... went down between you and me, I don't think I ever failed to talk about your crazy generosity and your capacity for fellowship and how much fun was had.
I've replied to your post - not for the sake of clearing my name or for absolution. I've done so because you've said you might be willing to put an end to all this. I'd like to put a stop to all this apportioning of blame. It goes nowhere and nobody wins. I'd like nothing more than to end this and shake hands.
Last edited: