- Joined
- Apr 6, 2015
- Messages
- 6,290
- Location
- NJ
Kropo had an interesting write-up about the plight of satellite bikes with the introduction of additional factory entries.
The spec electronics have definitely helped to decrease the gap between Honda/Yamaha and Suzuki/Ducati. But it's still the Honda/Yamaha show no matter what anyone wants to believe. Unless Aprilia gets a more powerful engine built, they are going to continue languishing, and KTM is an x-factor.
Given what we've seen out of the Pramac Ducati, or even the Avintia Ducati, I still think it is possible for satellite bikes to run well. Ducati seems to have more interest in providing fairly decent bikes to their satellites, while Yamaha and Honda haven't done a great deal with Tech 3, LCR, or Marc VDS.
Attracting riders is problematic for Tech 3 right now more than anyone IMO because Rossi's seat is locked up for two more years, and given the promises of Pol Espargaro possibly taking over that seat going up in smoke, younger riders are probably leery about the Tech 3 seat.
"I am not a very happy man," Tech 3 boss Hervé Poncharal told us on the Thursday before Barcelona. His problem? Attracting competitive riders to take the seats vacated by Bradley Smith and Pol Espargaro. Their destination was emblematic of Poncharal's problem: at Barcelona, Espargaro announced he would be reunited with his Tech 3 teammate in the factory KTM team in 2017 and 2018.
So Poncharal found himself with the looming likelihood of fielding two rookies in 2017. The Tech 3 boss signed Jonas Folger back in Le Mans, while Johann Zarco is the prime candidate to fill the second Tech 3 seat. (Zarco is currently in Japan testing Suzuki's GSX-RR MotoGP machine. He is expected to sign with Tech 3 once Suzuki have announced they are signing Alex Rins to partner Andrea Iannone.)
The original hope was either to keep Pol Espargaro alongside Folger, to ensure consistency of results, or welcome Alex Rins into the fold on a factory Yamaha contract. Either way, it would ensure the publicity which is vital to keeping sponsors happy. Two rookies and no factory connections is a lot less appealing to the people who help provide the €8-€9 million it costs to run the Tech 3 team.
Read the rest at his site:
https://motomatters.com/analysis/2016/06/13/fast_factories_vs_suffering_satellites.html
The spec electronics have definitely helped to decrease the gap between Honda/Yamaha and Suzuki/Ducati. But it's still the Honda/Yamaha show no matter what anyone wants to believe. Unless Aprilia gets a more powerful engine built, they are going to continue languishing, and KTM is an x-factor.
Given what we've seen out of the Pramac Ducati, or even the Avintia Ducati, I still think it is possible for satellite bikes to run well. Ducati seems to have more interest in providing fairly decent bikes to their satellites, while Yamaha and Honda haven't done a great deal with Tech 3, LCR, or Marc VDS.
Attracting riders is problematic for Tech 3 right now more than anyone IMO because Rossi's seat is locked up for two more years, and given the promises of Pol Espargaro possibly taking over that seat going up in smoke, younger riders are probably leery about the Tech 3 seat.