<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Tom @ Apr 12 2008, 01:29 AM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>
Well the alternative demands of wet racing obviously avoided some of the suzukis more significant shortfalls. And Obviously Kenny deserves some credit too, he rode very well.
Here you sort of got the point about rain being a leveller (as opposed to making all bikes
equal, which
no-one has argued). I agree KRJR rode to the best of his ability, but presumably he did that in the dry too. And got pretty much no-where in 2005.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Tom @ Apr 14 2008, 03:07 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Consider a hypothetical situation where there are two bikes, each with different Chassis designs and setups. They have different geometry and different stiffnesses, they offer different forces and weight transfers to their different tyres. These tyres heat up in different ways and offer differing amounts of grip and longevity. The bikes engines have different amounts of power and different power deliveries. You honestly believe that due to the fact that the surface is wet, these bikes will both offer the same maximum speed capability, feel and feedback as each other?
If rain was in fact a "leveler" and what you are suggesting is true then we would be witnessing one of the biggest coincedences ever. Furthermore teams would never have to concern themselfes with wet setups or developing rain tyres, because ultimately all equipment would be equal regardless of science. Imagine the time and money they could save with this phenomenon.
Here you're trying to prove that rain doesn't make all bikes equal.
Stop - we know it doesn't. And it does not change the fact that rain can be a leveller, particularly related to power shortcomings.