But I thought that Ducati built a far superior bike in 2007 that won many races in the dry that Stoner just sat on whilst it won and then went on to win more races than anyone else, mostly in the dry?
I think Ducati can and have built a bike that a truly talented rider can win on but have failed to build a bike that lesser riders can win on.
I think Ducati's biggest failure has been in rider recruitment and retention.
How is it that lesser riders beat the 'truly talented' Casey Stoner then at Le Mans in the wet, the 'truly talented' one who is riding arguably the best bike on the grid, and rain as we know is a great leveler....?