This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Engine Capacity

But I thought that Ducati built a far superior bike in 2007 that won many races in the dry that Stoner just sat on whilst it won and then went on to win more races than anyone else, mostly in the dry?



I think Ducati can and have built a bike that a truly talented rider can win on but have failed to build a bike that lesser riders can win on.



I think Ducati's biggest failure has been in rider recruitment and retention.



How is it that lesser riders beat the 'truly talented' Casey Stoner then at Le Mans in the wet, the 'truly talented' one who is riding arguably the best bike on the grid, and rain as we know is a great leveler....?
 
There are no riders as talented as Stoner in MotoGP at present. My reference to failed recruitment strategy is their recruitment of Rossi. Not because Rossi is not a great rider but because if Rossi failed, which he so far has, then it was never going to be his fault and if he succeeded it was never going to be Ducati's success to claim. In other words recruiting Rossi was always a lose, gain nothing scenario for Ducati.



They would have been much smarter recognising the skill set that Stoner had that allowed him to ride the bike and then searching for a rider with the same or similar skill set. They did to a degree with Hayden but unfortunately Hayden lacks the same mental toughness that Stoner has. To be honest I don't know who they could have hired but what I do know is that hiring riders who grew up on mini bikes was never going to work. Anyone with even a bit of unbiased knowledge would have declared the Ducati as the complete opposite of what Rossi, Melandri, Capirossi needs to win races.

So in your opinion the Ducati is just fine IF Ducati could have kept Casey or can find another Casey... Why didn't you just say you agree with the rest of the world - the Ducati was/is a beast that only Casey could tame!
 
Oh and BTW - Ducati ...... up their chances of retaining Casey by treating him as chattle... he couldn't get outta there quickly enough!



Yeah - way to go Ducati!
 
So in your opinion the Ducati is just fine IF Ducati could have kept Casey or can find another Casey... Why didn't you just say you agree with the rest of the world - the Ducati was/is a beast that only Casey could tame!



No, No......first they need to find another Casey, then they need to get the control tyre reg removed, and find another tyre manufacturer ready to beat Bridgestone, and produce near perfect rubber that never goes off and suits their bike. If this fails then they need to hope that the 'Truly talented' Casey style rider doesn't get sick due to the way he needs to ride the bike, and they need to find a way to ensure that he doesn't end up in the gravel trap every second race......all the while they need to make Honda remove their seamless gearbox, and go back 20 or so chassis variations......and after all this, they might get their new 'Casey' style rider to win a couple of races and finish around.......5th in the championship.......and after 5-6 years of this, they need to hope that the new Casey doesn't get the ..... and retire, then we are back to square one again.......great strategy for Ducati this one......
 
So in your opinion the Ducati is just fine IF Ducati could have kept Casey or can find another Casey... Why didn't you just say you agree with the rest of the world - the Ducati was/is a beast that only Casey could tame!



I agree with it being a beast. Weren't the 500's beasts? Didn't every one love them? Back in the 500 era it was all Americans and Aussies doing it at the front because the bikes were beasts. Now all the Euro's want nice little placid bikes that they can ride like their little mini motos.



The Ducati was an excellent bike but it needed to be man handled by a man. Metro men need not apply.
 
Meanwhile Yamaha and Honda continue to churn out bikes riders of any style, or apparently according to MA, any talent level, can be instantly competitive on...
 
Where did I say any talent level? Most of the riders in GP are the best there are in the world. It just happens that, much to the disappointment of boppers, there is someone who is a step above even these great riders. Haven't seen the Honda win many championships in the last 5 or so years unless an American or an Aussie were on it so as far as churning out bikes that any rider can be competitive on, I think you will find the facts seem to disagree.
 
Apparently not 'cause men of lesser talent (ie Rossi) got on fine with them!



Rode the best of the bikes on the grid. Crashed it for a season then won on it. Good on him. Not like he mastered them for a generation or beat the previous multi WC on them either.
 
One word answer - Pedders. 100 podiums, competitive, capice? God you're funny... please give me your take on Senna's time at Williams!



Oh - talent level... Obviously Vale is in the "lesser talent level" you brought up in the first post I replied to... yet he managed to eek out a coupla WCs while the more talented rider struggled on the Duc.
 
How is it that lesser riders beat the 'truly talented' Casey Stoner then at Le Mans in the wet, the 'truly talented' one who is riding arguably the best bike on the grid, and rain as we know is a great leveler....?



Then what happened at Silverstone 2011 etc. ?



I think Le Mans 2012 was more a case of Rossi pulled his finger out .......... combined with a touch of luck.
 
One word answer - Pedders. 100 podiums, competitive, capice? God you're funny... please give me your take on Senna's time at Williams!



Oh - talent level... Obviously Vale is in the "lesser talent level" you brought up in the first post I replied to... yet he managed to eek out a coupla WCs while the more talented rider struggled on the Duc.



Funny how ONE good placing has raised Rossi's level again so immensely ........ I think you guys need a tad more patience yet.

Thats been ONE out a ....... >20 races, and he was still miles off Lorenzo ......... and the guy he beat for second is a retiree FFS ........ and the retiree is practically riding a gopher!
<
<
<
 
So in your opinion the Ducati is just fine IF Ducati could have kept Casey or can find another Casey... Why didn't you just say you agree with the rest of the world - the Ducati was/is a beast that only Casey could tame!

Maybe. Honda would have been just fine had they found another Rossi in 2004. It took the almighty Honda a full 7 years and a magic gearbox to finally dominate the championship again.

It took Yamaha 12 years to replace Wayne Rainey and win another championship.

Just because Rossi is the wrong match for Ducati doesnt mean some other kid out there is not the right fit and would kick Casey Stoners ... while he's at it.
 
Maybe. Honda would have been just fine had they found another Rossi in 2004. It took the almighty Honda a full 7 years, CASEY and a magic gearbox to finally WIN the championship again.

It took Yamaha 12 years to replace Wayne Rainey and win another championship.

Just because Rossi is the wrong match for Ducati doesnt mean some other kid out there is not the right fit and would kick Casey Stoners ... while he's at it.
No doubt... let me know when yer done shaking trees and sorting through the nuts! I mean, Ducati's got the cash to sit in neutral and wait, right?
 
No doubt... let me know when yer done shaking trees and sorting through the nuts! I mean, Ducati's got the cash to sit in neutral and wait, right?



Not anymore they don't. 2011 & 12 will be the most expensive years in the history of Ducati with little to show for it. Any cash they had is gone.
 
No doubt... let me know when yer done shaking trees and sorting through the nuts! I mean, Ducati's got the cash to sit in neutral and wait, right?

Why wait? All they have to do based on past experience is skip down their preferred rider list to the fourth choice rookie crasher and hire him. Could be one called Bradl. Could be Crutchlow or Luthi. That or maybe just switch development to Hayden!
 
Why wait? All they have to do based on past experience is skip down their preferred rider list to the fourth choice rookie crasher and hire him. Could be one called Bradl. Could be Crutchlow or Luthi. That or maybe just switch development to Hayden!

Or wait 'til hell freezes over - I'll spell it out. Casey's don't grow on trees... sure throw all the eager kids on it let them fall (getting the analogy yet?) I'll be watching MGP with my long grey beard before Ducati finds another Casey!
 
How is it that lesser riders beat the 'truly talented' Casey Stoner then at Le Mans in the wet, the 'truly talented' one who is riding arguably the best bike on the grid, and rain as we know is a great leveler....?



And which rider might you be referring to?
 
I agree with it being a beast. Weren't the 500's beasts? Didn't every one love them? Back in the 500 era it was all Americans and Aussies doing it at the front because the bikes were beasts. Now all the Euro's want nice little placid bikes that they can ride like their little mini motos.



The Ducati was an excellent bike but it needed to be man handled by a man. Metro men need not apply.



Yes... but this is a false equivalence. All the 500s were more or less equally cantankeous. Handling-wise it was essentially a level playing field.
 

Recent Discussions