3427091360101399
He sure does. Put him on a Duc, then lets talk. See that guy named Rossi, also known as the Goat? He did pretty good this test too. Most likey would have apeared 11th on a GP13...that wouldn't have looked too impressive. I don't expect many to connect the dots buddy. I'll assume, present company excluded. I knew the lessons of last two years would quickly fade. The frenzy of excitment numbing the analysis seems to be the order of the day. See that kid Iannone languishing to beat CRTs? That kid while in Moto2 (on generally accepted inferior bike) was a fair many times an equal to Marquez, the greatest new rider in the world. I wonder what accounts for the stark contrast today? It wouldn't be becasue the RCV is the best bike on the grid now would it? And I might as well say now, as I can already imagine the retort, well he is a rookie, right? That is a step not as long and large as it once was, many a new rider has said this. Anyway, i've already read several "I told you so" posts. Hey look, I knew this kid fast...yeah, no .... hes on the fastest bike during a time where the next best thing wasn't what it use to be in recent memory. Until we see these guys challenged on other machines, like say Stoner, on anything other than the best bikes (of a whopping 4) then we can't make much conclusions of anything. Again, my point, that won't stop peeps from making them.
3424741359897869
One absolute truth is that there is no possibility that the manufacturers will set up a ccompeting series, successful or otherwise.
3427501360144859
Krop, I am going to answer you soon, worked exactly 17 hours yesterday, I'm getting smashed, I'm becoming exhausted and ineffective. Not so ineffective that I failed to observe my main premise (the wiggle room theory) was the one not touched in your reply. I feel like the black knight, you may have got an arm and a leg but I still have an opportunity to bite your knees and I will once I am deprogrammed.
Sorry, the rebel series doesn't have to be manufacturer based, just supported AND as much as we all assume that winners will repeat victories those that have failed previously can change and sooner or later they get a win.
The hypothetical rebel series may learn from the .... ups of the past, you never know.
3427541360146780
Hypothetically, it could happen. But Dorna holds a lot of the cards. Look at BSB: MSVR owns a number of the circuits, and can intimidate the circuits it doesn't own by threatening to pull the series. Same with Dorna: "Oh, you want to run a RebelGP round? That's a shame, we were hoping to have both a MotoGP and a WSBK round at your circuit, but we have had some very attractive offers from other circuits. And I spoke to my good friend Bernie recently ..."
You get the picture. Could it happen? It's not impossible. But about as likely as Colin Edwards becoming 2013 MotoGP World Champion.
3427721360151716
Maybe the team suzuki should merge with is ducati.
3427491360143895
Jum i tend to agree with a lot of your posts but the above does not stack up,Bradl also had the better of MM many times and is on his second year on the tyres and a very close Honda and he is not doing what MM is and that is down to talent.
3428341360182295
Friend, in my opnion, and its only an opnion, Marquez had the margin of Bradl in the lower category, logically it should be about the same today, only reason he lost the championship to the German was, imho, becasue the kid crashed a bit too much. Otherwise Marquez would be the two time Moto2 champ. These bikes don't ride themselves, so it would be an error to think Marquez isn't one of the best to have ever come out of the lower classes, as confirmed by keeping up with the joneses (Pedro, Jlo, VR) on equal footing. That is impressive enough. That is why the margin is so small between Bradl and Marquez so far in testing. The point I was making by contrasting the difference betweein Crazy Joe and McMarquez being so dramatically large in testing, is that I;m attributing it to what is underneath them. (As I said before, and I don't want to get off on a tangent, but its conceivable VR would have been sitting in 11th on a GP13). I concede that Marquez is the better rider than Iannone, but is he really 2 secs a lap faster? I'm not so sure buddy.
+13428341360182295
Jum i tend to agree with a lot of your posts but the above does not stack up,Bradl also had the better of MM many times and is on his second year on the tyres and a very close Honda and he is not doing what MM is and that is down to talent.
Friend, in my opnion, and its only an opnion, Marquez had the margin of Bradl in the lower category, logically it should be about the same today, only reason he lost the championship to the German was, imho, becasue the kid crashed a bit too much. Otherwise Marquez would be the two time Moto2 champ. These bikes don't ride themselves, so it would be an error to think Marquez isn't one of the best to have ever come out of the lower classes, as confirmed by keeping up with the joneses (Pedro, Jlo, VR) on equal footing. That is impressive enough. That is why the margin is so small between Bradl and Marquez so far in testing. The point I was making by contrasting the difference betweein Crazy Joe and McMarquez being so dramatically large in testing, is that I;m attributing it to what is underneath them. (As I said before, and I don't want to get off on a tangent, but its conceivable VR would have been sitting in 11th on a GP13). I concede that Marquez is the better rider than Iannone, but is he really 2+ secs a lap faster? I'm not so sure buddy.
3428361360182946
Please Jumks stop been so politically correct!
FFS I live in England!
Marquez had the measure or Bradl for sure.
Then his team allowed him and encouraged him to act like a<span style="color:#ff0000; cnt!
He damaged himself FFS!
Don't take nowt from Bradl IMO
MM threw it away
3427721360151716
Maybe the team suzuki should merge with is ducati.
3428841360206236
VW's motorcycle brand (in a way) merging with Audi's motorcycle brand. Irony?
3429221360225880
I was mainly joking as you obviously realised, but apart from doubting that suzuki would be doing any worse than ducati has been doing recently short of getting stoner back and going radical again ducati might get an aluminium space frame chassis going more quickly with suzuki involved.
3428341360182295
Friend, in my opnion, and its only an opnion, Marquez had the margin of Bradl in the lower category, logically it should be about the same today, only reason he lost the championship to the German was, imho, becasue the kid crashed a bit too much. Otherwise Marquez would be the two time Moto2 champ. These bikes don't ride themselves, so it would be an error to think Marquez isn't one of the best to have ever come out of the lower classes, as confirmed by keeping up with the joneses (Pedro, Jlo, VR) on equal footing. That is impressive enough. That is why the margin is so small between Bradl and Marquez so far in testing. The point I was making by contrasting the difference betweein Crazy Joe and McMarquez being so dramatically large in testing, is that I;m attributing it to what is underneath them. (As I said before, and I don't want to get off on a tangent, but its conceivable VR would have been sitting in 11th on a GP13). I concede that Marquez is the better rider than Iannone, but is he really 2+ secs a lap faster? I'm not so sure buddy.
3428341360182295
Friend, in my opnion, and its only an opnion, Marquez had the margin of Bradl in the lower category, logically it should be about the same today, only reason he lost the championship to the German was, imho, becasue the kid crashed a bit too much. Otherwise Marquez would be the two time Moto2 champ. These bikes don't ride themselves, so it would be an error to think Marquez isn't one of the best to have ever come out of the lower classes, as confirmed by keeping up with the joneses (Pedro, Jlo, VR) on equal footing. That is impressive enough. That is why the margin is so small between Bradl and Marquez so far in testing. The point I was making by contrasting the difference betweein Crazy Joe and McMarquez being so dramatically large in testing, is that I;m attributing it to what is underneath them. (As I said before, and I don't want to get off on a tangent, but its conceivable VR would have been sitting in 11th on a GP13). I concede that Marquez is the better rider than Iannone, but is he really 2+ secs a lap faster? I'm not so sure buddy.