<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Anders GUZZI @ Jun 20 2008, 06:08 AM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Hayden said the pneumatic engine made the handling better when he tried it before,as the chassi was made for that engine.So maybe the turning has improved plus the extra revs help on straights.
Maybe he will do better from now on then.
I agree. I remember eurosport (i think) said that the pneumatic valve engine had a significantly different center of gravity because it required additional equipment and, specifically, additional equipment on top of the engine.
In my mind, this means that Nicky must chuck the bike around to get it pitched over, but once it's at lean he can relax and let the high cg do most of the work while he uses the seat of his pants to control yaw.
Such handling is not good for Dani b/c he lacks the mass necessary to toss the bike from side to side. He seems to prefer to do the hard work while the bike is at full lean.
I think high CG is the way to go. I'm pretty sure Yamaha use a high CG. If you look at the M1's profile it appears the only place to put an 800cc mill is just slightly below the clip ons.
High CG also means you can lean the bike less to achieve the same turning radius.
On Topic:
Spies is predictably slow. In all his testing at Sepang he never managed to get within a second of the Suzuki regulars. Donny and Sepang are both unknown to Spies.
I wonder if making the jump to a completely different traction control system is affecting him. If you're used to traction control but it works completely differently than MGP traction control, I wonder if it is worse than coming from no traction control at all.