Sometimes, I feel like MotoGP takes a while to make improvements because the way they present the development argument is not quite right. They often frame it as a choice between moving forward or going backward, which can lead to heated discussions and oversimplified opinions. However, I believe this framing misrepresents the issue at hand.
In reality, the sport cannot really move backward. Even if they were to bring back the 2-stroke formula, the modern 2-stroke componentry would be much more advanced than what we had in the 80s and 90s. It's unlikely that suppliers could even build equipment to those old specs nowadays. This problem is also seen in vintage formulas and exhibitions, where trying to recreate the past exactly becomes quite challenging.
The real challenge is about finding a productive path forward. The meaning and specifics of the concept are crucial because it affects the direction the sport takes. However, the entrenched powers might resist any significant changes or progress. Dorna seems to be pushing for more NASCAR-like uniformity, while the MSMA is advocating for formulas that mostly benefit a small number of companies.
As fans, if we want to see positive changes, we need to be on the same page. When we draw imaginary lines to separate those who prefer old-school approaches from those who embrace new technology, it only leads to internal conflicts. And when the governing body (GPC) sees this, they might just ignore it altogether.
If fans unite and show a clear and common vision, things might start to change for the better. And it might not take long, especially if we get a few seasons of exciting racing like a Ducati Cup. This could spark the momentum needed for real progress and improvements in the sport.
the-race.com
