<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (krusty @ May 20 2008, 02:47 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>How you can call
son of doohan a
fanboy, when he quite rightly pointed out your
fanboy tattoo (BTW, that would have to be the quintessential defining characteristic of a true fanboy) is beyond me. Alas, given your IQ, you would fail to see the irony!
Krusty,
Here is the
irony, you point out a guy who calls himself:
'son of doohan' to point out that another guy ('roger-m') is a "fanboy" because of something that he identifies with and roots for. (see what I mean?)
Not trying to pick a fight with either of you (Krust or Doo), just trying to make a point that rang ironically funny when I read this post. Just seems it makes
me no more or no less a
fanboy than the Nicky Hayden T-.... I have on right now; though I concede, I am a fanboy, I still think I can carry a 50% redeemable opinion about the subject of who I root for. (a few may disagree, but they are just ........ "fanboys."
)
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (krusty @ May 20 2008, 02:05 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Thank God I live with the knowledge that Valentino has better taste and will NEVER have, nor aspire to get, a "Roger" tattoo!
Not sure if Hayden would want a Jumkie tattoo, but I would be happy to pay for it.