This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

A theoretical question on the Yamaha seat

Would Dorna interfere in the decision of who gets the 2nd Yamaha seat?

  • No, Dorna would not interfere. They will let Yamaha choose

    Votes: 27 84.4%
  • Yes, they would interfere, and try to get Dani Pedrosa on the second Yamaha

    Votes: 2 6.3%
  • Yes, they would interfere, and try to get Maverick Viñales on the bike.

    Votes: 3 9.4%

  • Total voters
    32
How is like for like false? Not worth a billion words I'll grant but yes belittling, not just disagreeing like you are trying to dress it up like.

Because it is not like for like, by very many orders of magnitude, none of the people on here know you personally or are known by you, posting on this obscure forum is not the same as broadcasting to the media at large, and more particularly nor does anyone on here have millions of fans who will be persuaded by any casual utterance we might make.
 
Again, a straw man argument that has nothing to do with the topic.

You're belittled because you make consistently stupid comments that have no factual basis behind them, or are easily disproven.

Once you understand that and stop trying to maintain tenuous positions in an effort to try and present yourself as some voice of reason --that you most certainly are not-- you'd find things to be a lot different. For as long as you insist on making indefensible posts, I will continue to use all sorts of adjectives to describe them, as well as you.

But you aren't disproving me, you are disagreeing which is fine, how do you disprove an opinion anyway?
 
Ok show everyone where I said Pedrosa was my favorite for starters, go on...

How many people write dissertations about Dani????

What I have repeatedly said is that I dislike all the crap that goes on in just about every thread because of an incident last year, I have not defended the incident whatsoever.

I admit I like Rossi but hey , why is my dog called Dani? Because I'm a fan of him too, tell you what, start a thread about him and write a load of ..... about him and then I'll be discrediting that too.

Look elsewhere on the net and this forum looks awfully biased, I'm just trying to balance it out. Wasting my time in reality.



Don't get upset buddy, I was just expressing my opinion. You did say you'd rather Dani won than Rossi, judging by your plethora of pro Rossi posts that are delusional at best at times you are definitely a bopper. You do come out with some daft stuff mate, you called your dog Dani after Pedrosa.
Why not Vale after your clear favourite, or are you afraid of insulting your hero by using his name on a dog? It's certainly feasible by your strange standards where he's concerned.
As for your pot kettle black comment, it's a load of rubbish, Rossi insults fellow professionals who he races with and sees all the time, this is done in a most unpleasant way and beamed around the globe by the worlds media. When posters on here insult/criticise him on here, it's between us, Rossi isn't on here lapping up the grief. He never sees the stuff written in this tiny corner of the Internet.
Of course you know this and just post any rubbish to try and justify your often warped dedication to a man who probably wouldn't speak to you if you passed him on the high street, in fact he'd probably have his entourage keep you away.
Your voice of reason and bringing balance to the forum claim is a load of crap buddy, folks are seeing through your deceit, your inner bopper is now well on display. As I said before I don't mind your views and opinions, everyone has a right to one. What I do object to is someone who claims to be one thing and isn't, but uses his subterfuge to wheedle his way in before starting his offensive. In my opinion it's exactly what you've done here.
Night.
 
But you aren't disproving me, you are disagreeing which is fine, how do you disprove an opinion anyway?

What are you doing on here then? Despite a previous post in which you claim to be arguing your point of view calmly and rationally in an attempt to change opinions with which you disagree, you have settled down to pretty much repeating your own opinion over and over and continuing to express your dislike of criticism of Rossi without really making any case as to why the criticism of him is unreasonable or should cease.
 
Last edited:
Don't get upset buddy, I was just expressing my opinion. You did say you'd rather Dani won than Rossi, judging by your plethora of pro Rossi posts that are delusional at best at times you are definitely a bopper. You do come out with some daft stuff mate, you called your dog Dani after Pedrosa.
Why not Vale after your clear favourite, or are you afraid of insulting your hero by using his name on a dog? It's certainly feasible by your strange standards where he's concerned.
As for your pot kettle black comment, it's a load of rubbish, Rossi insults fellow professionals who he races with and sees all the time, this is done in a most unpleasant way and beamed around the globe by the worlds media. When posters on here insult/criticise him on here, it's between us, Rossi isn't on here lapping up the grief. He never sees the stuff written in this tiny corner of the Internet.
Of course you know this and just post any rubbish to try and justify your often warped dedication to a man who probably wouldn't speak to you if you passed him on the high street, in fact he'd probably have his entourage keep you away.
Your voice of reason and bringing balance to the forum claim is a load of crap buddy, folks are seeing through your deceit, your inner bopper is now well on display. As I said before I don't mind your views and opinions, everyone has a right to one. What I do object to is someone who claims to be one thing and isn't, but uses his subterfuge to wheedle his way in before starting his offensive. In my opinion it's exactly what you've done here.
Night.

You don't half talk rubbish, your nearly 50 years old but you have the style of writing of a child.
 
What are you doing on here then? Despite a previous post in which you claim to be arguing your point of view calmly and rationally in an attempt to change opinions with which you disagree, you have settled down to pretty much repeating your own opinion over and over and continuing to express your dislike of criticism of Rossi without really making any case as to why the criticism of him is unreasonable or should cease.

I'll admit I got rattled by the internet bullies, but calm has returned and I'll just talk to people who have respect and don't think they know everything.
 
You don't half talk rubbish, your nearly 50 years old but you have the style of writing of a child.
He was writing in simple terms even a child would understand in hopes that you'd comprehend, unfortunately he overestimated you.

Content Warning: Look ....... (.)(.)
 
He was talking in simple terms even a child would understand in hopes that you'd comprehend, unfortunately he overestimated you.

Content Warning: Look ....... (.)(.)

It looked to me like he'd had a good few drinks when he wrote it, stop the not so subtle insults Jumkie , you're a better man than that. I hope.
 
I'll admit I got rattled by the internet bullies, but calm has returned and I'll just talk to people who have respect and don't think they know everything.

Your problem remains that, calm or not, you are not presenting any arguments as to why criticism of Rossi is unreasonable or should cease as I said. We have another example of why the issue continues to be raised every race week-end, with the story about bodyguards being required for MM and JL at Mugello, the issue of the continuing booing being raised in the wider media, and a former world champion calling Rossi out on it.

Again you attempt moral equivalence, if you consider you are being bullied on here ( largely it is your opinions which are being criticised although criticism of Rossi seems to assume the status of personal insults for Rossi fans such as you), in the wider world the bullying is vastly more from the Rossi and Rossi fan side of the divide in any case.
 
I've never once ridden a 500 2 stroke on the road with a blow up doll of Rossi's girlfriend on the back....

There is both the time for you to do this, and a first time for everything.

Hi ho, hi ho to the rubber doll ... shop you must go ...........







Or maybe there are spares at club Shovel
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
So because you are in the Rossi hate society you can write what the hell you want about me, get it all wrong and then when I respond it's an insult?
 
As your recent reference to a "Rossi hate society" amply demonstrates, you clearly have your own agenda, in support of which you are not really producing anything, so I am afraid remaining calm in pursuit of said agenda when others eventually become irritated at you being unwilling to debate any substantive issue does not give you any moral high ground whatever you might choose to believe.

Justify your position. That is all.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Fixed it for






Now that is childish smartass and petulant behaviour :p

So when yamfan makes sweeping generalisations about me that are figments of his imagination, I am not allowed to respond?
He even had the cheek to call me out on naming my dog!!!
Wasn't too long ago I had a dog which I named Vale, I bought another of the same breed and called him Dani, so I had a pair of dogs named after my two favourite riders . Yet yamfan thinks I called Dani so as not to insult Rossi!
 
So when yamfan makes sweeping generalisations about me that are figments of his imagination, I am not allowed to respond?
He even had the cheek to call me out on naming my dog!!!
Wasn't too long ago I had a dog which I named Vale, I bought another of the same breed and called him Dani, so I had a pair of dogs named after my two favourite riders . Yet yamfan thinks I called Dani so as not to insult Rossi!

You have outed yourself in your previous post I am afraid DB.

Calling those you oppose on here the "Rossi Hate Society" hardly constitutes an argument, arguments being something in regard to which you remain fairly completely deficient. Again, why exactly is criticism of Rossi's late 2015 season behaviour and the ongoing consequences of that behaviour for both the sport in general and 2 riders who will quite likely be listed among the greats of the sport when they retire unjustified, and why should such criticism cease?

What you are actually confronting is an anti- the hate generated by Rossi and a substantial element of his fandom society, btw.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
So when yamfan makes sweeping generalisations about me that are figments of his imagination, I am not allowed to respond?
He even had the cheek to call me out on naming my dog!!!
Wasn't too long ago I had a dog which I named Vale, I bought another of the same breed and called him Dani, so I had a pair of dogs named after my two favourite riders . Yet yamfan thinks I called Dani so as not to insult Rossi!


Chill Dani .................... now, sit, breathe in and then out .................

You are on the very defensive if you read that as an attack on you or your comments .......... seriously dude, chill

The comments made are a smartass pisstaking tongue in cheek comment made by myself at a number of comments from a number of sources that you so unwittingly enabled with the typo ......... the sheer fact (my opinion) that you seem to be so offended either says you are looking to be offended or are so defensive that you are unable to read comments without seeing them as aimed at you.

Seriously dude, once again chill
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
You're entitled to your opinion of course, which is all I take it as. Nothing more.
 
You're entitled to your opinion of course, which is all I take it as. Nothing more.


Opinions are like ........ - we all have one, and we all can be one, some are well cleaned whilst others build up a smell that makes some observers screw up their noses at the smell offered.

Where people fail in debate is offering opinion as fact and it is done from all sides of the great divide that holds the yellow stream. To some that yellow stream if a golden world of all that is good and great, to others it is simply the piss of those that have swilled on the cool aid to long
 

Recent Discussions