This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

#65 to be retired

Joined Mar 2007
2K Posts | 0+
Alpha Setti 5
News confirmed today that the #65 is to be retired and Capirossi to take up post as safety advisor.



we're gonna run out of numbers at this rate.....
 
I can understand why. Its like he has been in gp for ever and imho has done a lot for the sport. He has pushed saftey and been an ambassador for the sport. Only injury prevented him from being a champ.

Saying this tho i would have prefered 58 over 65 if a number was to be retired.
 
That is interesting. I mean, yeah, I guess I could make a case to retire his number as much as I could for many other riders. I don't know, my opinion, and its just an opinion is, I wouldn't have retired his number. For the record, I was for the 58 being retired, because his life was taken on the track. But I won't argue the point much beyond that.
 
That is interesting. I mean, yeah, I guess I could make a case to retire his number as much as I could for many other riders. I don't know, my opinion, and its just an opinion is, I wouldn't have retired his number. For the record, I was for the 58 being retired, because his life was taken on the track. But I won't argue the point much beyond that.

Prety much my feeling's on it compa.
 
Im against any retired number, but if people insist, you should have to be an absolute marvel at your sport, which i dont think Capirossi was. Great guy, but far from one of the all timers.
 
Im against any retired number, but if people insist, you should have to be an absolute marvel at your sport, which i dont think Capirossi was. Great guy, but far from one of the all timers.



Is that what you really think? I guess you haven't followed the sport as long as some of us, well I guess you're entitled to your opinion.

What do you think makes a rider 'one of the all timers'?
 
no problem for stefan, his 65 was just a sponsor thing because of a 6,5% loan you could get from windreich AG
 
I'm surprised that they are retiring his number. My view is that it should be reserved for those who are killed in the sport. They are starting to set a precedent now. 99, 46, 26, 27 and 69 will all be out of action in about 10 years time the way they are going.
 
Is that what you really think? I guess you haven't followed the sport as long as some of us, well I guess you're entitled to your opinion.

What do you think makes a rider 'one of the all timers'?

Sweety,im older than you and have followed the sport since 1970, almost as long as you have been alive. I guess i should ask you what warrants a retired number, besides 9 wins and zero titles.
 
I guess you haven't followed the sport as long as some of us, well I guess you're entitled to your opinion.



Only Yoda could get away with that one.





Hey what about, in some cases, numbers being taken out of use for a period of time, maybe a decade, not forever.
 
I wouldn't retire his number. As great of a guy Capirossi has been (Suzuki might argue otherwise), and as successful as he's been in lower classes and winning some premier class races (some may say he was deserving of a four-stroke Honda in 2002, which could have led him to another level of success, but I digress), he's never won a 500cc/MotoGP World Championship. My opinion is that numbers should be retired to riders killed on track, and absolute legends. I'm talking multiple world-championship-winning riders like Rossi, Doohan, Rainey, etc. Because if this precedent is set, then as Woody said, you can absolutely make the case that in addition to retiring the 46 when Rossi is gone (and looking likely the 27, as well), you now have to retire the 69, the 99, and the 26. Those three have achieved more than Capirossi in their careers, so there's no reason not to retire those numbers now.



When speaking about retiring numbers, I think you have to be extremely selective and careful about who you retire. I wouldn't have retired Hayden's 69, but with the Capirossi news, the numbers would suggest Hayden's has to be. It's a bad move, in my opinion.
 
...what warrants a retired number, besides 9 wins and zero titles.



Ur not talking about Loris are u? If so, check his stats once again.
<
 
Btw, guys, i think the main argument in favor of retiring his number (if we were to insist) is for Loris' longevity. I think i heard somebody say, of all the GPs ever run in the history of the series, he has been nearly part of 20-30% of its span. Thats a lot of longevity. Think of it as the undisputed ironman of GP. That is a pretty big accomplishment if u pause and think about it.
 
Sweety,im older than you and have followed the sport since 1970, almost as long as you have been alive. I guess i should ask you what warrants a retired number, besides 9 wins and zero titles.

I guess its stupid ignorant comment's like this that make it look like you have only followed the sport since the end of 06
<


He has 3 titles numbnutts
<


How old are you then pov ?
 

Recent Discussions