The great things about statistics is that they can be anything you want them to be.
Let's take the first 6 years in each rider's premier class career:
Rossi: 5 world championships, 1 runner up
Lorenzo: 2 world championships, 2 runner ups
Casey Stoner: 2 world championships, 1 runner up
Marc Marquez: Only 5 years yet in the world championships. 4 world championships, 1 third place.
Even if Marquez wins the 2018 world title, Rossi has a better record. Lorenzo and Stoner don't even compare.
Forum logic says that Rossi sucks and all of the others are the best ever, though!
Against the same competition which is the only fair comparison
2007-2012
Rossi vs Stoner
2 titles each
21 wins vs 38 wins
2008- current
Rossi vs Lorenzo
2 championships vs 3 championships
27 wins vs 44 wins
2013-current
Rossi vs Marquez
0 championships vs 4 championships
10 wins vs 35 wins.
Only Rossi had the biggest bike advantage we've seen since MV wiped the floor with everyone during one year. Only Rossi was getting tyres tailored to his likes and data out of these guys. Comparing their first 6 years is a ridiculous argument when none of the others enjoyed the same advantages as Rossi and those before him. His head to head record in the same conditions against the same guys is not as good as you would expect from the 'GOAT' even if he record against Marquez reflects his current age.
Last edited: