Give Zarco a year on the thing!
Two Marquezs on one team? Ok, why not?
Cal's been riding a near-factory bike for some time, with little to show other than piles of debris...
Bautista... already contracted to HRC. Zarco goes to Honda WSBK?
Possibility, but unlikely. Only if Honda believes Zarco would do better job at WSBK than Bautista. I'm sure Zarco does not want to leave MotoGP.
Regarding Alex ... why would Honda want him? Beating Lüthi does not guarantee he has top 10 potential in MotoGP.
I would say HRC can get anyone they want tbh. Contracts generally have a buy out clause in them and it’s not like HRC can’t afford to buy out a contract. Zarco is probably the leading man right now but his ok results on the easier to ride 2018 bike do not mean he will do well on the 2019 bike as I’m sure HRC are aware.
What is this 2019 bike is harder to ride business.
Here is the info I'm aware of.
Honda added more power to the engine. There has been no mention of any other changes to the bike.
Honda said Marc is great champion and coped immediately with more power.
Crutchlow said riding it is problematic (or something along the lines).
OK, so the top end is stronger now, more top speed and better acceleration on 5th and 6th. Anything below this is electronically restricted and the full power is not used - and wasn't used before. So how exactly makes this change bike harder to ride and how it "completely changes the nature of bike" as some have alleged?
My BS meter is on high. Honda praising their champ, not surprising, is it? Crutchlow telling how hard he has to work - hardly a scientific argument.
I'm all ears if someone can shed some light on this "harder to ride" business.
What is this 2019 bike is harder to ride business.
Here is the info I'm aware of.
Honda added more power to the engine. There has been no mention of any other changes to the bike.
Honda said Marc is great champion and coped immediately with more power.
Crutchlow said riding it is problematic (or something along the lines).
OK, so the top end is stronger now, more top speed and better acceleration on 5th and 6th. Anything below this is electronically restricted and the full power is not used - and wasn't used before. So how exactly makes this change bike harder to ride and how it "completely changes the nature of bike" as some have alleged?
My BS meter is on high. Honda praising their champ, not surprising, is it? Crutchlow telling how hard he has to work - hardly a scientific argument.
I'm all ears if someone can shed some light on this "harder to ride" business.
This is BS. Well, technically yes, if you have got bigger engine then there is more engine braking power. But as long as the displacement and compression ratio remain the same there is no difference in engine braking. More power is achieved by burning more fuel or burning it in a more efficient way. These factors do not influence engine braking power.I suspect this has been addressed but...
More power and torque = more engine braking = more pitch / overloaded front = more bracing/stiffness = less front end feel.
This is BS. Well, technically yes, if you have got bigger engine then there is more engine braking power. But as long as the displacement and compression ratio remain the same there is no difference in engine braking. More power is achieved by burning more fuel or burning it in a more efficient way. These factors do not influence engine braking power.